Interpretability of Language Models via Task Spaces

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.06441v1
• Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 16:34:30 GMT
• Title: Interpretability of Language Models via Task Spaces
• Authors: Lucas Weber, Jaap Jumelet, Elia Bruni, Dieuwke Hupkes,
• Abstract summary: We present an alternative approach to interpret language models (LMs) We focus on the quality of LM processing, with a focus on their language abilities. We construct 'linguistic task spaces' that shed light on the connections LMs draw between language phenomena.
• Score: 14.543168558734001
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The usual way to interpret language models (LMs) is to test their performance on different benchmarks and subsequently infer their internal processes. In this paper, we present an alternative approach, concentrating on the quality of LM processing, with a focus on their language abilities. To this end, we construct 'linguistic task spaces' -- representations of an LM's language conceptualisation -- that shed light on the connections LMs draw between language phenomena. Task spaces are based on the interactions of the learning signals from different linguistic phenomena, which we assess via a method we call 'similarity probing'. To disentangle the learning signals of linguistic phenomena, we further introduce a method called 'fine-tuning via gradient differentials' (FTGD). We apply our methods to language models of three different scales and find that larger models generalise better to overarching general concepts for linguistic tasks, making better use of their shared structure. Further, the distributedness of linguistic processing increases with pre-training through increased parameter sharing between related linguistic tasks. The overall generalisation patterns are mostly stable throughout training and not marked by incisive stages, potentially explaining the lack of successful curriculum strategies for LMs.

Related papers

• Unified Generative and Discriminative Training for Multi-modal Large Language Models [88.84491005030316]
  Generative training has enabled Vision-Language Models (VLMs) to tackle various complex tasks. Discriminative training, exemplified by models like CLIP, excels in zero-shot image-text classification and retrieval. This paper proposes a unified approach that integrates the strengths of both paradigms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-01T01:51:31Z)
• Linguistically Grounded Analysis of Language Models using Shapley Head Values [2.914115079173979]
  We investigate the processing of morphosyntactic phenomena by leveraging a recently proposed method for probing language models via Shapley Head Values (SHVs) Using the English language BLiMP dataset, we test our approach on two widely used models, BERT and RoBERTa, and compare how linguistic constructions are handled. Our results show that SHV-based attributions reveal distinct patterns across both models, providing insights into how language models organize and process linguistic information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T09:48:08Z)
• Assessing Code Generation with Intermediate Languages [6.999311675957218]
  This study explores the utilization of intermediate languages, including various programming languages, natural language solutions, and pseudo-code. Our findings reveal that intermediate languages generally exhibit greater efficacy in larger models that have not yet achieved state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-07T15:35:41Z)
• Large Language Models are Interpretable Learners [53.56735770834617]
  In this paper, we show a combination of Large Language Models (LLMs) and symbolic programs can bridge the gap between expressiveness and interpretability. The pretrained LLM with natural language prompts provides a massive set of interpretable modules that can transform raw input into natural language concepts. As the knowledge learned by LSP is a combination of natural language descriptions and symbolic rules, it is easily transferable to humans (interpretable) and other LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T02:18:15Z)
• Probing LLMs for Joint Encoding of Linguistic Categories [10.988109020181563]
  We propose a framework for testing the joint encoding of linguistic categories in Large Language Models (LLMs) We find evidence of joint encoding both at the same (related part-of-speech (POS) classes) and different (POS classes and related syntactic dependency relations) levels of linguistic hierarchy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-28T12:46:40Z)
• Are Structural Concepts Universal in Transformer Language Models? Towards Interpretable Cross-Lingual Generalization [27.368684663279463]
  We investigate the potential for explicitly aligning conceptual correspondence between languages to enhance cross-lingual generalization. Using the syntactic aspect of language as a testbed, our analyses of 43 languages reveal a high degree of alignability. We propose a meta-learning-based method to learn to align conceptual spaces of different languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T14:50:51Z)
• On the cross-lingual transferability of multilingual prototypical models across NLU tasks [2.44288434255221]
  Supervised deep learning-based approaches have been applied to task-oriented dialog and have proven to be effective for limited domain and language applications. In practice, these approaches suffer from the drawbacks of domain-driven design and under-resourced languages. This article proposes to investigate the cross-lingual transferability of using synergistically few-shot learning with prototypical neural networks and multilingual Transformers-based models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-19T09:55:04Z)
• Bridging the Gap between Language Models and Cross-Lingual Sequence Labeling [101.74165219364264]
  Large-scale cross-lingual pre-trained language models (xPLMs) have shown effectiveness in cross-lingual sequence labeling tasks. Despite the great success, we draw an empirical observation that there is a training objective gap between pre-training and fine-tuning stages. In this paper, we first design a pre-training task tailored for xSL named Cross-lingual Language Informative Span Masking (CLISM) to eliminate the objective gap. Second, we present ContrAstive-Consistency Regularization (CACR), which utilizes contrastive learning to encourage the consistency between representations of input parallel
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-11T15:55:20Z)
• Integrating Language Guidance into Vision-based Deep Metric Learning [78.18860829585182]
  We propose to learn metric spaces which encode semantic similarities as embedding space. These spaces should be transferable to classes beyond those seen during training. This causes learned embedding spaces to encode incomplete semantic context and misrepresent the semantic relation between classes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-16T11:06:50Z)
• SLM: Learning a Discourse Language Representation with Sentence Unshuffling [53.42814722621715]
  We introduce Sentence-level Language Modeling, a new pre-training objective for learning a discourse language representation. We show that this feature of our model improves the performance of the original BERT by large margins.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-30T13:33:41Z)
• Cross-lingual Spoken Language Understanding with Regularized Representation Alignment [71.53159402053392]
  We propose a regularization approach to align word-level and sentence-level representations across languages without any external resource. Experiments on the cross-lingual spoken language understanding task show that our model outperforms current state-of-the-art methods in both few-shot and zero-shot scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-30T08:56:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.