PairCFR: Enhancing Model Training on Paired Counterfactually Augmented Data through Contrastive Learning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.06633v1
- Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2024 07:29:55 GMT
- Title: PairCFR: Enhancing Model Training on Paired Counterfactually Augmented Data through Contrastive Learning
- Authors: Xiaoqi Qiu, Yongjie Wang, Xu Guo, Zhiwei Zeng, Yue Yu, Yuhong Feng, Chunyan Miao,
- Abstract summary: Counterfactually Augmented Data (CAD) involves creating new data samples by applying minimal yet sufficient modifications to flip the label of existing data samples to other classes.
Recent research reveals that training with CAD may lead models to overly focus on modified features while ignoring other important contextual information.
We employ contrastive learning to promote global feature alignment in addition to learning counterfactual clues.
- Score: 49.60634126342945
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Counterfactually Augmented Data (CAD) involves creating new data samples by applying minimal yet sufficient modifications to flip the label of existing data samples to other classes. Training with CAD enhances model robustness against spurious features that happen to correlate with labels by spreading the casual relationships across different classes. Yet, recent research reveals that training with CAD may lead models to overly focus on modified features while ignoring other important contextual information, inadvertently introducing biases that may impair performance on out-ofdistribution (OOD) datasets. To mitigate this issue, we employ contrastive learning to promote global feature alignment in addition to learning counterfactual clues. We theoretically prove that contrastive loss can encourage models to leverage a broader range of features beyond those modified ones. Comprehensive experiments on two human-edited CAD datasets demonstrate that our proposed method outperforms the state-of-the-art on OOD datasets.
Related papers
- Exploring the Efficacy of Meta-Learning: Unveiling Superior Data Diversity Utilization of MAML Over Pre-training [1.3980986259786223]
We show that dataset diversity can impact the performance of vision models.
Our study shows positive correlations between test set accuracy and data diversity.
These findings support our hypothesis and demonstrate a promising way for a deeper exploration of how formal data diversity influences model performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-15T00:56:59Z) - Dissecting Representation Misalignment in Contrastive Learning via Influence Function [15.28417468377201]
We introduce the Extended Influence Function for Contrastive Loss (ECIF), an influence function crafted for contrastive loss.
ECIF considers both positive and negative samples and provides a closed-form approximation of contrastive learning models.
Building upon ECIF, we develop a series of algorithms for data evaluation, misalignment detection, and misprediction trace-back tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-18T15:45:41Z) - Leveraging Diffusion Disentangled Representations to Mitigate Shortcuts
in Underspecified Visual Tasks [92.32670915472099]
We propose an ensemble diversification framework exploiting the generation of synthetic counterfactuals using Diffusion Probabilistic Models (DPMs)
We show that diffusion-guided diversification can lead models to avert attention from shortcut cues, achieving ensemble diversity performance comparable to previous methods requiring additional data collection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-03T17:37:52Z) - Enhancing Multiple Reliability Measures via Nuisance-extended
Information Bottleneck [77.37409441129995]
In practical scenarios where training data is limited, many predictive signals in the data can be rather from some biases in data acquisition.
We consider an adversarial threat model under a mutual information constraint to cover a wider class of perturbations in training.
We propose an autoencoder-based training to implement the objective, as well as practical encoder designs to facilitate the proposed hybrid discriminative-generative training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-24T16:03:21Z) - Striving for data-model efficiency: Identifying data externalities on
group performance [75.17591306911015]
Building trustworthy, effective, and responsible machine learning systems hinges on understanding how differences in training data and modeling decisions interact to impact predictive performance.
We focus on a particular type of data-model inefficiency, in which adding training data from some sources can actually lower performance evaluated on key sub-groups of the population.
Our results indicate that data-efficiency is a key component of both accurate and trustworthy machine learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-11T16:48:27Z) - An Investigation of the (In)effectiveness of Counterfactually Augmented
Data [10.316235366821111]
We show that while counterfactually-augmented data (CAD) is effective at identifying robust features, it may prevent the model from learning unperturbed robust features.
Our results show that the lack of perturbation diversity in current CAD datasets limits its effectiveness on OOD generalization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-01T21:46:43Z) - Negative Data Augmentation [127.28042046152954]
We show that negative data augmentation samples provide information on the support of the data distribution.
We introduce a new GAN training objective where we use NDA as an additional source of synthetic data for the discriminator.
Empirically, models trained with our method achieve improved conditional/unconditional image generation along with improved anomaly detection capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-09T20:28:35Z) - MixKD: Towards Efficient Distillation of Large-scale Language Models [129.73786264834894]
We propose MixKD, a data-agnostic distillation framework, to endow the resulting model with stronger generalization ability.
We prove from a theoretical perspective that under reasonable conditions MixKD gives rise to a smaller gap between the error and the empirical error.
Experiments under a limited-data setting and ablation studies further demonstrate the advantages of the proposed approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-01T18:47:51Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.