Sample Complexity Reduction via Policy Difference Estimation in Tabular Reinforcement Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.06856v1
• Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 00:02:19 GMT
• Title: Sample Complexity Reduction via Policy Difference Estimation in Tabular Reinforcement Learning
• Authors: Adhyyan Narang, Andrew Wagenmaker, Lillian Ratliff, Kevin Jamieson,
• Abstract summary: Existing work in bandits has shown that it is possible to identify the best policy by estimating only the difference between the behaviors of individual policies. However, the best-known complexities in RL fail to take advantage of this and instead estimate the behavior of each policy directly. We show that it almost suffices to estimate only the differences in RL: if we can estimate the behavior of a single reference policy, it suffices to only estimate how any other policy deviates from this reference policy.
• Score: 8.182196998385582
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In this paper, we study the non-asymptotic sample complexity for the pure exploration problem in contextual bandits and tabular reinforcement learning (RL): identifying an epsilon-optimal policy from a set of policies with high probability. Existing work in bandits has shown that it is possible to identify the best policy by estimating only the difference between the behaviors of individual policies, which can be substantially cheaper than estimating the behavior of each policy directly. However, the best-known complexities in RL fail to take advantage of this and instead estimate the behavior of each policy directly. Does it suffice to estimate only the differences in the behaviors of policies in RL? We answer this question positively for contextual bandits but in the negative for tabular RL, showing a separation between contextual bandits and RL. However, inspired by this, we show that it almost suffices to estimate only the differences in RL: if we can estimate the behavior of a single reference policy, it suffices to only estimate how any other policy deviates from this reference policy. We develop an algorithm which instantiates this principle and obtains, to the best of our knowledge, the tightest known bound on the sample complexity of tabular RL.

Related papers

• Statistical Analysis of Policy Space Compression Problem [54.1754937830779]
  Policy search methods are crucial in reinforcement learning, offering a framework to address continuous state-action and partially observable problems. Reducing the policy space through policy compression emerges as a powerful, reward-free approach to accelerate the learning process. This technique condenses the policy space into a smaller, representative set while maintaining most of the original effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-15T02:46:55Z)
• Policy learning "without" overlap: Pessimism and generalized empirical Bernstein's inequality [94.89246810243053]
  This paper studies offline policy learning, which aims at utilizing observations collected a priori to learn an optimal individualized decision rule. Existing policy learning methods rely on a uniform overlap assumption, i.e., the propensities of exploring all actions for all individual characteristics must be lower bounded. We propose Pessimistic Policy Learning (PPL), a new algorithm that optimize lower confidence bounds (LCBs) instead of point estimates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-19T22:43:08Z)
• Minimax Off-Policy Evaluation for Multi-Armed Bandits [58.7013651350436]
  We study the problem of off-policy evaluation in the multi-armed bandit model with bounded rewards. We develop minimax rate-optimal procedures under three settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-19T18:55:29Z)
• Off-Policy Evaluation of Slate Policies under Bayes Risk [70.10677881866047]
  We study the problem of off-policy evaluation for slate bandits, for the typical case in which the logging policy factorizes over the slots of the slate. We show that the risk improvement over PI grows linearly with the number of slots, and linearly with the gap between the arithmetic and the harmonic mean of a set of slot-level divergences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-05T20:07:56Z)
• Understanding the Pathologies of Approximate Policy Evaluation when Combined with Greedification in Reinforcement Learning [11.295757620340899]
  Theory of reinforcement learning with value function approximation remains fundamentally incomplete. Prior work has identified a variety of pathological behaviours that arise in RL algorithms that combine approximate on-policy evaluation and greedification. We present examples illustrating that in addition to policy oscillation and multiple fixed points -- the same basic issue can lead to convergence to the worst possible policy for a given approximation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-28T22:57:57Z)
• Expert-Supervised Reinforcement Learning for Offline Policy Learning and Evaluation [21.703965401500913]
  We propose an Expert-Supervised RL (ESRL) framework which uses uncertainty quantification for offline policy learning. In particular, we have three contributions: 1) the method can learn safe and optimal policies through hypothesis testing, 2) ESRL allows for different levels of risk averse implementations tailored to the application context, and 3) we propose a way to interpret ESRL's policy at every state through posterior distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-23T17:43:44Z)
• Policy Evaluation Networks [50.53250641051648]
  We introduce a scalable, differentiable fingerprinting mechanism that retains essential policy information in a concise embedding. Our empirical results demonstrate that combining these three elements can produce policies that outperform those that generated the training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-26T23:00:27Z)
• BRPO: Batch Residual Policy Optimization [79.53696635382592]
  In batch reinforcement learning, one often constrains a learned policy to be close to the behavior (data-generating) policy. We propose residual policies, where the allowable deviation of the learned policy is state-action-dependent. We derive a new for RL method, BRPO, which learns both the policy and allowable deviation that jointly maximize a lower bound on policy performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-08T01:59:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.