Guiding In-Context Learning of LLMs through Quality Estimation for Machine Translation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.07970v3
- Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 07:06:02 GMT
- Title: Guiding In-Context Learning of LLMs through Quality Estimation for Machine Translation
- Authors: Javad Pourmostafa Roshan Sharami, Dimitar Shterionov, Pieter Spronck,
- Abstract summary: This paper presents a novel methodology for in-context learning (ICL) that relies on a search algorithm guided by domain-specific quality estimation (QE)
Our results demonstrate significant improvements over existing ICL methods and higher translation performance compared to fine-tuning a pre-trained language model (PLM)
- Score: 0.846600473226587
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The quality of output from large language models (LLMs), particularly in machine translation (MT), is closely tied to the quality of in-context examples (ICEs) provided along with the query, i.e., the text to translate. The effectiveness of these ICEs is influenced by various factors, such as the domain of the source text, the order in which the ICEs are presented, the number of these examples, and the prompt templates used. Naturally, selecting the most impactful ICEs depends on understanding how these affect the resulting translation quality, which ultimately relies on translation references or human judgment. This paper presents a novel methodology for in-context learning (ICL) that relies on a search algorithm guided by domain-specific quality estimation (QE). Leveraging the XGLM model, our methodology estimates the resulting translation quality without the need for translation references, selecting effective ICEs for MT to maximize translation quality. Our results demonstrate significant improvements over existing ICL methods and higher translation performance compared to fine-tuning a pre-trained language model (PLM), specifically mBART-50.
Related papers
- LLM-based Translation Inference with Iterative Bilingual Understanding [45.00660558229326]
We propose a novel Iterative Bilingual Understanding Translation method based on the cross-lingual capabilities of large language models (LLMs)
The cross-lingual capability of LLMs enables the generation of contextual understanding for both the source and target languages separately.
The proposed IBUT outperforms several strong comparison methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-16T13:21:46Z) - Are Large Language Models State-of-the-art Quality Estimators for Machine Translation of User-generated Content? [6.213698466889738]
This paper investigates whether large language models (LLMs) are state-of-the-art quality estimators for machine translation of user-generated content (UGC)
We employ an existing emotion-related dataset with human-annotated errors and calculate quality evaluation scores based on the Multi-dimensional Quality Metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-08T20:16:59Z) - The Power of Question Translation Training in Multilingual Reasoning: Broadened Scope and Deepened Insights [108.40766216456413]
We propose a question alignment framework to bridge the gap between large language models' English and non-English performance.
Experiment results show it can boost multilingual performance across diverse reasoning scenarios, model families, and sizes.
We analyze representation space, generated response and data scales, and reveal how question translation training strengthens language alignment within LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-02T14:49:50Z) - Building Accurate Translation-Tailored LLMs with Language Aware Instruction Tuning [57.323716555996114]
Off-target translation remains an unsolved problem, especially for low-resource languages.
Recent works have either designed advanced prompting strategies to highlight the functionality of translation instructions or exploited the in-context learning ability of LLMs.
In this work, we design a two-stage fine-tuning algorithm to improve the instruction-following ability (especially the translation direction) of LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-21T13:47:40Z) - Lost in the Source Language: How Large Language Models Evaluate the Quality of Machine Translation [64.5862977630713]
This study investigates how Large Language Models (LLMs) leverage source and reference data in machine translation evaluation task.
We find that reference information significantly enhances the evaluation accuracy, while surprisingly, source information sometimes is counterproductive.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-12T13:23:21Z) - The Devil is in the Errors: Leveraging Large Language Models for
Fine-grained Machine Translation Evaluation [93.01964988474755]
AutoMQM is a prompting technique which asks large language models to identify and categorize errors in translations.
We study the impact of labeled data through in-context learning and finetuning.
We then evaluate AutoMQM with PaLM-2 models, and we find that it improves performance compared to just prompting for scores.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-14T17:17:21Z) - Exploring Human-Like Translation Strategy with Large Language Models [93.49333173279508]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in general scenarios.
This work proposes the MAPS framework, which stands for Multi-Aspect Prompting and Selection.
We employ a selection mechanism based on quality estimation to filter out noisy and unhelpful knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-06T19:03:12Z) - Machine Translation Impact in E-commerce Multilingual Search [0.0]
Cross-lingual information retrieval correlates highly with the quality of Machine Translation.
There may be a threshold beyond which improving query translation quality yields little or no benefit to further improve the retrieval performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-31T21:59:35Z) - Measuring Uncertainty in Translation Quality Evaluation (TQE) [62.997667081978825]
This work carries out motivated research to correctly estimate the confidence intervals citeBrown_etal2001Interval depending on the sample size of the translated text.
The methodology we applied for this work is from Bernoulli Statistical Distribution Modelling (BSDM) and Monte Carlo Sampling Analysis (MCSA)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-15T12:09:08Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.