How Decentralization Affects User Agency on Social Platforms
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.09035v1
- Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 12:15:15 GMT
- Title: How Decentralization Affects User Agency on Social Platforms
- Authors: Aditya Surve, Aneesh Shamraj, Swapneel Mehta,
- Abstract summary: We investigate how decentralization might present promise as an alternative model to walled garden platforms.
We describe the user-driven content moderation through blocks as an expression of agency on Bluesky, a decentralized social platform.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Mainstream social media platforms function as "walled garden" ecosystems that restrict user agency, control, and data portability. They have demonstrated a lack of transparency that contributes to a multitude of online harms. Our research investigates how decentralization might present promise as an alternative model to walled garden platforms. Specifically, we describe the user-driven content moderation through blocks as an expression of agency on Bluesky, a decentralized social platform. We examine the impact of providing users with more granular control over their online experiences, including what they post, who can see it, and whose content they are exposed to. We describe the patterns identified in user-driven content moderation and suggest directions for further research.
Related papers
- Decentralized Social Networks and the Future of Free Speech Online [4.249974621573213]
Decentralized social networks like Mastodon and BlueSky are trending topics that have drawn much attention and discussion in recent years.
This article critically assesses the decentralization project's prospect for communications online.
It uses normative theories of free speech to examine whether and how the decentralization design could facilitate users' freedom of expression online.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-11T04:18:53Z) - Content Moderation Justice and Fairness on Social Media: Comparisons
Across Different Contexts and Platforms [23.735552021636245]
We conduct an online experiment on 200 American social media users of Reddit and Twitter.
We find that retributive moderation delivers higher justice and fairness for commercially moderated platforms in illegal violations.
We discuss the opportunities for platform policymaking to improve moderation system design.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-09T22:50:06Z) - Content Moderation and the Formation of Online Communities: A
Theoretical Framework [7.900694093691988]
We study the impact of content moderation policies in online communities.
We first characterize the effectiveness of a natural class of moderation policies for creating and sustaining stable communities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-16T16:49:44Z) - The Design and Operation of Digital Platform under Sociotechnical Folk
Theories [0.4297070083645048]
We consider the problem of how a platform designer, owner, or operator can improve the design and operation of a digital platform.
We do so in the context of Reddit, a social media platform whose owners and administrators make extensive use of shadowbanning.
We develop a computational cognitive model of users's folk theories about the antecedents and consequences of shadowbanning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-05T05:47:37Z) - A User-Driven Framework for Regulating and Auditing Social Media [94.70018274127231]
We propose that algorithmic filtering should be regulated with respect to a flexible, user-driven baseline.
We require that the feeds a platform filters contain "similar" informational content as their respective baseline feeds.
We present an auditing procedure that checks whether a platform honors this requirement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-20T17:53:34Z) - Explainable Abuse Detection as Intent Classification and Slot Filling [66.80201541759409]
We introduce the concept of policy-aware abuse detection, abandoning the unrealistic expectation that systems can reliably learn which phenomena constitute abuse from inspecting the data alone.
We show how architectures for intent classification and slot filling can be used for abuse detection, while providing a rationale for model decisions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-06T03:33:30Z) - Having your Privacy Cake and Eating it Too: Platform-supported Auditing
of Social Media Algorithms for Public Interest [70.02478301291264]
Social media platforms curate access to information and opportunities, and so play a critical role in shaping public discourse.
Prior studies have used black-box methods to show that these algorithms can lead to biased or discriminatory outcomes.
We propose a new method for platform-supported auditing that can meet the goals of the proposed legislation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-18T17:32:35Z) - News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation.
Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content.
The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z) - Information Consumption and Social Response in a Segregated Environment:
the Case of Gab [74.5095691235917]
This work provides a characterization of the interaction patterns within Gab around the COVID-19 topic.
We find that there are no strong statistical differences in the social response to questionable and reliable content.
Our results provide insights toward the understanding of coordinated inauthentic behavior and on the early-warning of information operation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-03T11:34:25Z) - Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms.
We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features.
We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.