Is Value Learning Really the Main Bottleneck in Offline RL?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.09329v2
• Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 23:33:19 GMT
• Title: Is Value Learning Really the Main Bottleneck in Offline RL?
• Authors: Seohong Park, Kevin Frans, Sergey Levine, Aviral Kumar,
• Abstract summary: We show that the choice of a policy extraction algorithm significantly affects the performance and scalability of offline RL. We propose two simple test-time policy improvement methods and show that these methods lead to better performance.
• Score: 70.54708989409409
• License:
• Abstract: While imitation learning requires access to high-quality data, offline reinforcement learning (RL) should, in principle, perform similarly or better with substantially lower data quality by using a value function. However, current results indicate that offline RL often performs worse than imitation learning, and it is often unclear what holds back the performance of offline RL. Motivated by this observation, we aim to understand the bottlenecks in current offline RL algorithms. While poor performance of offline RL is typically attributed to an imperfect value function, we ask: is the main bottleneck of offline RL indeed in learning the value function, or something else? To answer this question, we perform a systematic empirical study of (1) value learning, (2) policy extraction, and (3) policy generalization in offline RL problems, analyzing how these components affect performance. We make two surprising observations. First, we find that the choice of a policy extraction algorithm significantly affects the performance and scalability of offline RL, often more so than the value learning objective. For instance, we show that common value-weighted behavioral cloning objectives (e.g., AWR) do not fully leverage the learned value function, and switching to behavior-constrained policy gradient objectives (e.g., DDPG+BC) often leads to substantial improvements in performance and scalability. Second, we find that a big barrier to improving offline RL performance is often imperfect policy generalization on test-time states out of the support of the training data, rather than policy learning on in-distribution states. We then show that the use of suboptimal but high-coverage data or test-time policy training techniques can address this generalization issue in practice. Specifically, we propose two simple test-time policy improvement methods and show that these methods lead to better performance.

Related papers

• Benchmarks and Algorithms for Offline Preference-Based Reward Learning [41.676208473752425]
  We propose an approach that uses an offline dataset to craft preference queries via pool-based active learning. Our proposed approach does not require actual physical rollouts or an accurate simulator for either the reward learning or policy optimization steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-03T23:52:16Z)
• Flow to Control: Offline Reinforcement Learning with Lossless Primitive Discovery [31.49638957903016]
  offline reinforcement learning (RL) enables the agent to effectively learn from logged data. We show that our method has a good representation ability for policies and achieves superior performance in most tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-02T11:35:51Z)
• Boosting Offline Reinforcement Learning via Data Rebalancing [104.3767045977716]
  offline reinforcement learning (RL) is challenged by the distributional shift between learning policies and datasets. We propose a simple yet effective method to boost offline RL algorithms based on the observation that resampling a dataset keeps the distribution support unchanged. We dub our method ReD (Return-based Data Rebalance), which can be implemented with less than 10 lines of code change and adds negligible running time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-17T16:34:01Z)
• Jump-Start Reinforcement Learning [68.82380421479675]
  We present a meta algorithm that can use offline data, demonstrations, or a pre-existing policy to initialize an RL policy. In particular, we propose Jump-Start Reinforcement Learning (JSRL), an algorithm that employs two policies to solve tasks. We show via experiments that JSRL is able to significantly outperform existing imitation and reinforcement learning algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-05T17:25:22Z)
• Curriculum Offline Imitation Learning [72.1015201041391]
  offline reinforcement learning tasks require the agent to learn from a pre-collected dataset with no further interactions with the environment. We propose textitCurriculum Offline Learning (COIL), which utilizes an experience picking strategy for imitating from adaptive neighboring policies with a higher return. On continuous control benchmarks, we compare COIL against both imitation-based and RL-based methods, showing that it not only avoids just learning a mediocre behavior on mixed datasets but is also even competitive with state-of-the-art offline RL methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-03T08:02:48Z)
• Offline Reinforcement Learning with Value-based Episodic Memory [19.12430651038357]
  offline reinforcement learning (RL) shows promise of applying RL to real-world problems. We propose Expectile V-Learning (EVL), which smoothly interpolates between the optimal value learning and behavior cloning. We present a new offline method called Value-based Episodic Memory (VEM)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-19T08:20:11Z)
• Behavioral Priors and Dynamics Models: Improving Performance and Domain Transfer in Offline RL [82.93243616342275]
  We introduce Offline Model-based RL with Adaptive Behavioral Priors (MABE) MABE is based on the finding that dynamics models, which support within-domain generalization, and behavioral priors, which support cross-domain generalization, are complementary. In experiments that require cross-domain generalization, we find that MABE outperforms prior methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-16T20:48:49Z)
• Representation Matters: Offline Pretraining for Sequential Decision Making [27.74988221252854]
  In this paper, we consider a slightly different approach to incorporating offline data into sequential decision-making. We find that the use of pretraining with unsupervised learning objectives can dramatically improve the performance of policy learning algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-11T02:38:12Z)
• Near Real-World Benchmarks for Offline Reinforcement Learning [26.642722521820467]
  We present a suite of near real-world benchmarks, NewRL. NewRL contains datasets from various domains with controlled sizes and extra test datasets for the purpose of policy validation. We argue that the performance of a policy should also be compared with the deterministic version of the behavior policy, instead of the dataset reward.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-01T09:19:10Z)
• OPAL: Offline Primitive Discovery for Accelerating Offline Reinforcement Learning [107.6943868812716]
  In many practical applications, the situation is reversed: an agent may have access to large amounts of undirected offline experience data, while access to the online environment is severely limited. Our main insight is that, when presented with offline data composed of a variety of behaviors, an effective way to leverage this data is to extract a continuous space of recurring and temporally extended primitive behaviors. In addition to benefiting offline policy optimization, we show that performing offline primitive learning in this way can also be leveraged for improving few-shot imitation learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-26T14:31:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.