Problem-Solving in Language Model Networks
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.12374v3
- Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 13:05:58 GMT
- Title: Problem-Solving in Language Model Networks
- Authors: Ciaran Regan, Alexandre Gournail, Mizuki Oka,
- Abstract summary: This work extends the concept of multi-agent debate to more general network topologies.
It measures the question-answering accuracy, influence, consensus, and the effects of bias on the collective.
- Score: 44.99833362998488
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: To improve the reasoning and question-answering capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), several multi-agent approaches have been introduced. While these methods enhance performance, the application of collective intelligence-based approaches to complex network structures and the dynamics of agent interactions remain underexplored. This work extends the concept of multi-agent debate to more general network topologies, measuring the question-answering accuracy, influence, consensus, and the effects of bias on the collective. The results show that random networks perform similarly to fully connected networks despite using significantly fewer tokens. Furthermore, a strong consensus among agents correlates with correct answers, whereas divided responses typically indicate incorrect answers. Analysing the influence of the agents reveals a balance between self-reflection and interconnectedness; self-reflection aids when local interactions are incorrect, and local interactions aid when the agent itself is incorrect. Additionally, bias plays a strong role in system performance with correctly biased hub nodes boosting performance. These insights suggest that using random networks or scale-free networks with knowledgeable agents placed in central positions can enhance the overall question-answering performance of multi-agent systems.
Related papers
- Scaling Large-Language-Model-based Multi-Agent Collaboration [75.5241464256688]
Pioneering advancements in large language model-powered agents have underscored the design pattern of multi-agent collaboration.
Inspired by the neural scaling law, this study investigates whether a similar principle applies to increasing agents in multi-agent collaboration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-11T11:02:04Z) - Interactive Autonomous Navigation with Internal State Inference and
Interactivity Estimation [58.21683603243387]
We propose three auxiliary tasks with relational-temporal reasoning and integrate them into the standard Deep Learning framework.
These auxiliary tasks provide additional supervision signals to infer the behavior patterns other interactive agents.
Our approach achieves robust and state-of-the-art performance in terms of standard evaluation metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-27T18:57:42Z) - Leveraging Low-Rank and Sparse Recurrent Connectivity for Robust
Closed-Loop Control [63.310780486820796]
We show how a parameterization of recurrent connectivity influences robustness in closed-loop settings.
We find that closed-form continuous-time neural networks (CfCs) with fewer parameters can outperform their full-rank, fully-connected counterparts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-05T21:44:18Z) - Reward-Sharing Relational Networks in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
as a Framework for Emergent Behavior [0.0]
We integrate social' interactions into the MARL setup through a user-defined relational network.
We examine the effects of agent-agent relations on the rise of emergent behaviors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-12T23:27:42Z) - The Impact of Network Connectivity on Collective Learning [1.370633147306388]
In decentralised autonomous systems it is the interactions between individual agents which govern the collective behaviours of the system.
In this paper we investigate the impact that the underlying network has on performance in the context of collective learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-01T17:39:26Z) - Competing Adaptive Networks [56.56653763124104]
We develop an algorithm for decentralized competition among teams of adaptive agents.
We present an application in the decentralized training of generative adversarial neural networks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-29T14:42:15Z) - Modelling Cooperation in Network Games with Spatio-Temporal Complexity [11.665246332943058]
We study the emergence of self-organized cooperation in complex gridworld domains.
Using multi-agent deep reinforcement learning, we simulate an agent society for a variety of plausible mechanisms.
Our methods have implications for mechanism design in both human and artificial agent systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-13T12:04:52Z) - Learning to Communicate and Correct Pose Errors [75.03747122616605]
We study the setting proposed in V2VNet, where nearby self-driving vehicles jointly perform object detection and motion forecasting in a cooperative manner.
We propose a novel neural reasoning framework that learns to communicate, to estimate potential errors, and to reach a consensus about those errors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-10T18:19:40Z) - Multi-Agent Decentralized Belief Propagation on Graphs [0.0]
We consider the problem of interactive partially observable Markov decision processes (I-POMDPs)
We propose a decentralized belief propagation algorithm for the problem.
Our work appears to be the first study of decentralized belief propagation algorithm for networked multi-agent I-POMDPs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-06T18:16:26Z) - Ubiquitous Distributed Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge:
Analyzing Byzantine Agents in Discrete Action Spaces [0.06554326244334865]
This paper discusses some of the challenges in multi-agent distributed deep reinforcement learning that can occur in the presence of byzantine or malfunctioning agents.
We show how wrong discrete actions can significantly affect the collaborative learning effort.
Experiments are carried out in a simulation environment using the Atari testbed for the discrete action spaces, and advantage actor-critic (A2C) for the distributed multi-agent training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-18T11:25:39Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.