MC-MKE: A Fine-Grained Multimodal Knowledge Editing Benchmark Emphasizing Modality Consistency

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.13219v2
• Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 08:04:59 GMT
• Title: MC-MKE: A Fine-Grained Multimodal Knowledge Editing Benchmark Emphasizing Modality Consistency
• Authors: Junzhe Zhang, Huixuan Zhang, Xunjian Yin, Baizhou Huang, Xu Zhang, Xinyu Hu, Xiaojun Wan,
• Abstract summary: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are prone to non-factual or outdated knowledge issues. We decompose multimodal knowledge into its visual and textual components. We present MC-MKE, a fine-grained Multimodal Knowledge Editing benchmark.
• Score: 50.40318712497071
• License:
• Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are prone to non-factual or outdated knowledge issues, which can manifest as misreading and misrecognition errors due to the complexity of multimodal knowledge. Previous benchmarks have not systematically analyzed the performance of editing methods in correcting these two error types. To better represent and correct these errors, we decompose multimodal knowledge into its visual and textual components. Different error types correspond to different editing formats, which edit distinct parts of the multimodal knowledge. We present MC-MKE, a fine-grained Multimodal Knowledge Editing benchmark emphasizing Modality Consistency. Our benchmark facilitates independent correction of misreading and misrecognition errors by editing the corresponding knowledge component. We evaluate four multimodal knowledge editing methods on MC-MKE, revealing their limitations, particularly in terms of modality consistency. Our work highlights the challenges posed by multimodal knowledge editing and motivates further research in developing effective techniques for this task.

Related papers

• Related Knowledge Perturbation Matters: Rethinking Multiple Pieces of Knowledge Editing in Same-Subject [49.559994791305535]
  Current state-of-the-art editing methods struggle when tasked with editing multiple related knowledge pieces for the same subject. We introduce the $textS2textRKE$(Same-Subject Related Knowledge Editing) benchmark. Our experiments reveal that only mainstream locate-then-edit methods, such as ROME and MEMIT, exhibit "related knowledge perturbation"
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-08T04:47:17Z)
• ComprehendEdit: A Comprehensive Dataset and Evaluation Framework for Multimodal Knowledge Editing [27.034072044001736]
  Large multimodal language models (MLLMs) have revolutionized natural language processing and visual understanding. Current knowledge editing evaluations are limited in scope and potentially biased. We introduce ComprehendEdit, a comprehensive benchmark comprising eight diverse tasks from multiple datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-17T11:41:49Z)
• Visual-Oriented Fine-Grained Knowledge Editing for MultiModal Large Language Models [22.26930296101678]
  Existing knowledge editing works primarily focus on text-oriented, coarse-grained scenarios. We propose a visual-oriented, fine-grained multimodal knowledge editing task that targets precise editing in images with multiple interacting entities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-19T14:49:36Z)
• Uncovering Overfitting in Large Language Model Editing [35.55260822503773]
  We identify and investigate the phenomenon of Editing Overfit, where edited models assign disproportionately high probabilities to the edit target. We propose a new plug-and-play strategy called Learn to Inference (LTI), which introduce a Multi-stage Inference Constraint module to guide the edited models in recalling new knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T11:09:00Z)
• Cross-Lingual Multi-Hop Knowledge Editing [53.028586843468915]
  We propose the Cross-Lingual Multi-Hop Knowledge Editing paradigm, for measuring and analyzing the performance of various SoTA knowledge editing techniques in a cross-lingual setup. Specifically, we create a parallel cross-lingual benchmark, CROLIN-MQUAKE for measuring the knowledge editing capabilities. Following this, we propose a significantly improved system for cross-lingual multi-hop knowledge editing, CLEVER-CKE.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-14T17:18:16Z)
• A Comprehensive Study of Knowledge Editing for Large Language Models [82.65729336401027]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown extraordinary capabilities in understanding and generating text that closely mirrors human communication. This paper defines the knowledge editing problem and provides a comprehensive review of cutting-edge approaches. We introduce a new benchmark, KnowEdit, for a comprehensive empirical evaluation of representative knowledge editing approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-02T16:54:58Z)
• PokeMQA: Programmable knowledge editing for Multi-hop Question Answering [46.80110170981976]
  Multi-hop question answering (MQA) is one of the challenging tasks to evaluate machine's comprehension and reasoning abilities. We propose a framework, Programmable knowledge editing for Multi-hop Question Answering (MQA) Specifically, we prompt LLMs to decompose knowledge-augmented multi-hop question, while interacting with a detached trainable scope detector to modulate LLMs behavior depending on external conflict signal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-23T08:32:13Z)
• Editing Large Language Models: Problems, Methods, and Opportunities [51.903537096207]
  This paper embarks on a deep exploration of the problems, methods, and opportunities related to model editing for LLMs. We provide an exhaustive overview of the task definition and challenges associated with model editing, along with an in-depth empirical analysis of the most progressive methods currently at our disposal. Our objective is to provide valuable insights into the effectiveness and feasibility of each editing technique, thereby assisting the community in making informed decisions on the selection of the most appropriate method for a specific task or context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T16:00:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.