Evaluating Structural Generalization in Neural Machine Translation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.13363v1
• Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 09:09:11 GMT
• Title: Evaluating Structural Generalization in Neural Machine Translation
• Authors: Ryoma Kumon, Daiki Matsuoka, Hitomi Yanaka,
• Abstract summary: We construct SGET, a dataset covering various types of compositional generalization with control of words and sentence structures. We show that neural machine translation models struggle more in structural generalization than in lexical generalization. We also find different performance trends in semantic parsing and machine translation, which indicates the importance of evaluations across various tasks.
• Score: 13.880151307013318
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Compositional generalization refers to the ability to generalize to novel combinations of previously observed words and syntactic structures. Since it is regarded as a desired property of neural models, recent work has assessed compositional generalization in machine translation as well as semantic parsing. However, previous evaluations with machine translation have focused mostly on lexical generalization (i.e., generalization to unseen combinations of known words). Thus, it remains unclear to what extent models can translate sentences that require structural generalization (i.e., generalization to different sorts of syntactic structures). To address this question, we construct SGET, a machine translation dataset covering various types of compositional generalization with control of words and sentence structures. We evaluate neural machine translation models on SGET and show that they struggle more in structural generalization than in lexical generalization. We also find different performance trends in semantic parsing and machine translation, which indicates the importance of evaluations across various tasks.

Related papers

• Learning Syntax Without Planting Trees: Understanding When and Why Transformers Generalize Hierarchically [74.96551626420188]
  Transformers trained on natural language data have been shown to learn its hierarchical structure and generalize to sentences with unseen syntactic structures. We investigate sources of inductive bias in transformer models and their training that could cause such generalization behavior to emerge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-25T07:10:29Z)
• Position Paper: Generalized grammar rules and structure-based generalization beyond classical equivariance for lexical tasks and transduction [7.523978255716284]
  We propose a general framework for building models that can generalize compositionally using the concept of Generalized Grammar Rules (GGRs) Our framework is general enough to contain many existing works as special cases. We present ideas on how GGRs might be implemented, and in the process draw connections to reinforcement learning and other areas of research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T18:44:37Z)
• SLOG: A Structural Generalization Benchmark for Semantic Parsing [68.19511282584304]
  The goal of compositional generalization benchmarks is to evaluate how well models generalize to new complex linguistic expressions. Existing benchmarks often focus on lexical generalization, the interpretation of novel lexical items in syntactic structures familiar from training, are often underrepresented. We introduce SLOG, a semantic parsing dataset that extends COGS with 17 structural generalization cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T15:39:09Z)
• On Evaluating Multilingual Compositional Generalization with Translated Datasets [34.51457321680049]
  We show that compositional generalization abilities differ across languages. We craft a faithful rule-based translation of the MCWQ dataset from English to Chinese and Japanese. Even with the resulting robust benchmark, which we call MCWQ-R, we show that the distribution of compositions still suffers due to linguistic divergences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-20T10:03:57Z)
• How Do In-Context Examples Affect Compositional Generalization? [86.57079616209474]
  In this paper, we present CoFe, a test suite to investigate in-context compositional generalization. We find that the compositional generalization performance can be easily affected by the selection of in-context examples. Our systematic experiments indicate that in-context examples should be structurally similar to the test case, diverse from each other, and individually simple.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-08T16:32:18Z)
• Compositional Generalization Requires Compositional Parsers [69.77216620997305]
  We compare sequence-to-sequence models and models guided by compositional principles on the recent COGS corpus. We show structural generalization is a key measure of compositional generalization and requires models that are aware of complex structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-24T07:36:35Z)
• Disentangled Sequence to Sequence Learning for Compositional Generalization [62.954842223732435]
  We propose an extension to sequence-to-sequence models which allows us to learn disentangled representations by adaptively re-encoding the source input. Experimental results on semantic parsing and machine translation empirically show that our proposal yields more disentangled representations and better generalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-09T22:27:19Z)
• Improving Compositional Generalization in Classification Tasks via Structure Annotations [33.90268697120572]
  Humans have a great ability to generalize compositionally, but state-of-the-art neural models struggle to do so. First, we study ways to convert a natural language sequence-to-sequence dataset to a classification dataset that also requires compositional generalization. Second, we show that providing structural hints (specifically, providing parse trees and entity links as attention masks for a Transformer model) helps compositional generalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-19T06:07:27Z)
• Detecting and Understanding Generalization Barriers for Neural Machine Translation [53.23463279153577]
  This paper attempts to identify and understand generalization barrier words within an unseen input sentence. We propose a principled definition of generalization barrier words and a modified version which is tractable in computation. We then conduct extensive analyses on those detected generalization barrier words on both Zh$Leftrightarrow$En NIST benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-05T12:33:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.