On the Evaluation Practices in Multilingual NLP: Can Machine Translation Offer an Alternative to Human Translations?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.14267v1
• Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 12:46:12 GMT
• Title: On the Evaluation Practices in Multilingual NLP: Can Machine Translation Offer an Alternative to Human Translations?
• Authors: Rochelle Choenni, Sara Rajaee, Christof Monz, Ekaterina Shutova,
• Abstract summary: We present an analysis of existing evaluation frameworks in NLP. We propose several directions for more robust and reliable evaluation practices. We show that simpler baselines can achieve relatively strong performance without having benefited from large-scale multilingual pretraining.
• Score: 19.346078451375693
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: While multilingual language models (MLMs) have been trained on 100+ languages, they are typically only evaluated across a handful of them due to a lack of available test data in most languages. This is particularly problematic when assessing MLM's potential for low-resource and unseen languages. In this paper, we present an analysis of existing evaluation frameworks in multilingual NLP, discuss their limitations, and propose several directions for more robust and reliable evaluation practices. Furthermore, we empirically study to what extent machine translation offers a {reliable alternative to human translation} for large-scale evaluation of MLMs across a wide set of languages. We use a SOTA translation model to translate test data from 4 tasks to 198 languages and use them to evaluate three MLMs. We show that while the selected subsets of high-resource test languages are generally sufficiently representative of a wider range of high-resource languages, we tend to overestimate MLMs' ability on low-resource languages. Finally, we show that simpler baselines can achieve relatively strong performance without having benefited from large-scale multilingual pretraining.

Related papers

• Crosslingual Capabilities and Knowledge Barriers in Multilingual Large Language Models [62.91524967852552]
  Large language models (LLMs) are typically multilingual due to pretraining on diverse multilingual corpora. But can these models relate corresponding concepts across languages, effectively being crosslingual? This study evaluates six state-of-the-art LLMs on inherently crosslingual tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-23T15:15:17Z)
• Quantifying Multilingual Performance of Large Language Models Across Languages [48.40607157158246]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) perform better on high-resource languages like English, German, and French, while their capabilities in low-resource languages remain inadequate. We propose the Language Ranker, an intrinsic metric designed to benchmark and rank languages based on LLM performance using internal representations. Our analysis reveals that high-resource languages exhibit higher similarity scores with English, demonstrating superior performance, while low-resource languages show lower similarity scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-17T16:53:16Z)
• High-quality Data-to-Text Generation for Severely Under-Resourced Languages with Out-of-the-box Large Language Models [5.632410663467911]
  We explore the extent to which pretrained large language models (LLMs) can bridge the performance gap for under-resourced languages. We find that LLMs easily set the state of the art for the under-resourced languages by substantial margins. For all our languages, human evaluation shows on-a-par performance with humans for our best systems, but BLEU scores collapse compared to English.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T16:29:40Z)
• Enhancing Multilingual Capabilities of Large Language Models through Self-Distillation from Resource-Rich Languages [60.162717568496355]
  Large language models (LLMs) have been pre-trained on multilingual corpora. Their performance still lags behind in most languages compared to a few resource-rich languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T15:07:32Z)
• Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Reranking with Large Language Models for Low-Resource Languages [51.301942056881146]
  We investigate how large language models (LLMs) function as rerankers in cross-lingual information retrieval systems for African languages. Our implementation covers English and four African languages (Hausa, Somali, Swahili, and Yoruba) We examine cross-lingual reranking with queries in English and passages in the African languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-26T18:38:54Z)
• ChatGPT MT: Competitive for High- (but not Low-) Resource Languages [62.178282377729566]
  Large language models (LLMs) implicitly learn to perform a range of language tasks, including machine translation (MT) We present the first experimental evidence for an expansive set of 204 languages, along with MT cost analysis. Our analysis reveals that a language's resource level is the most important feature in determining ChatGPT's relative ability to translate it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-14T04:36:00Z)
• Democratizing LLMs for Low-Resource Languages by Leveraging their English Dominant Abilities with Linguistically-Diverse Prompts [75.33019401706188]
  Large language models (LLMs) are known to effectively perform tasks by simply observing few exemplars. We propose to assemble synthetic exemplars from a diverse set of high-resource languages to prompt the LLMs to translate from any language into English. Our unsupervised prompting method performs on par with supervised few-shot learning in LLMs of different sizes for translations between English and 13 Indic and 21 African low-resource languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-20T08:27:47Z)
• Beyond Static Models and Test Sets: Benchmarking the Potential of Pre-trained Models Across Tasks and Languages [15.373725507698591]
  We argue that this makes the existing practices in multilingual evaluation unreliable and does not provide a full picture of the performance of MMLMs across the linguistic landscape. We propose that the recent work done in Performance Prediction for NLP tasks can serve as a potential solution in fixing benchmarking in Multilingual NLP. We compare performance prediction with translating test data with a case study on four different multilingual datasets, and observe that these methods can provide reliable estimates of the performance that are often on-par with the translation based approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-12T20:42:48Z)
• El Departamento de Nosotros: How Machine Translated Corpora Affects Language Models in MRC Tasks [0.12183405753834563]
  Pre-training large-scale language models (LMs) requires huge amounts of text corpora. We study the caveats of applying directly translated corpora for fine-tuning LMs for downstream natural language processing tasks. We show that careful curation along with post-processing lead to improved performance and overall LMs robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-03T22:22:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.