Q*: Improving Multi-step Reasoning for LLMs with Deliberative Planning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.14283v4
- Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 10:01:49 GMT
- Title: Q*: Improving Multi-step Reasoning for LLMs with Deliberative Planning
- Authors: Chaojie Wang, Yanchen Deng, Zhiyi Lyu, Liang Zeng, Jujie He, Shuicheng Yan, Bo An,
- Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capability in many natural language tasks.
LLMs are prone to produce errors, hallucinations and inconsistent statements when performing multi-step reasoning.
We introduce Q*, a framework for guiding LLMs decoding process with deliberative planning.
- Score: 53.6472920229013
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capability in many natural language tasks. However, the auto-regressive generation process makes LLMs prone to produce errors, hallucinations and inconsistent statements when performing multi-step reasoning. In this paper, by casting multi-step reasoning of LLMs as a heuristic search problem, we aim to alleviate the pathology by introducing Q*, a general, versatile and agile framework for guiding LLMs decoding process with deliberative planning. By learning a plug-and-play Q-value model as heuristic function for estimating expected future rewards, our Q* can effectively guide LLMs to select the most promising next reasoning step without fine-tuning LLMs for the current task, which avoids the significant computational overhead and potential risk of performance degeneration on other tasks. Extensive experiments on GSM8K, MATH and MBPP demonstrate the superiority of our method, contributing to improving the reasoning performance of existing open-source LLMs.
Related papers
- Satori: Reinforcement Learning with Chain-of-Action-Thought Enhances LLM Reasoning via Autoregressive Search [57.28671084993782]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable reasoning capabilities across diverse domains.
Recent studies have shown that increasing test-time computation enhances LLMs' reasoning capabilities.
We propose a two-stage training paradigm: 1) a small-scale format tuning stage to internalize the COAT reasoning format and 2) a large-scale self-improvement stage leveraging reinforcement learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-04T17:26:58Z) - Dynamic Ensemble Reasoning for LLM Experts [35.774197263383996]
We propose a Dynamic Ensemble Reasoning paradigm, called DER, to integrate the strengths of multiple LLM experts conditioned on dynamic inputs.
Our method uses fewer computational resources to achieve better performance compared to state-of-the-art baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-10T12:05:56Z) - A Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models on Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis [26.505386645322506]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have garnered increasing attention in the field of natural language processing.
In this paper, we shed light on a comprehensive evaluation of LLMs in the ABSA field, involving 13 datasets, 8 ABSA subtasks, and 6 LLMs.
Our experiments demonstrate that LLMs achieve a new state-of-the-art performance compared to fine-tuned Small Language Models (SLMs) in the fine-tuning-dependent paradigm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-03T08:54:17Z) - zsLLMCode: An Effective Approach for Functional Code Embedding via LLM with Zero-Shot Learning [6.976968804436321]
Large language models (LLMs) have the capability of zero-shot learning, which does not require training or fine-tuning.
We propose zsLLMCode, a novel approach that generates functional code embeddings using LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-23T01:03:15Z) - Defining Boundaries: A Spectrum of Task Feasibility for Large Language Models [6.008311204104302]
Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performance in various tasks but often fail to handle queries that exceed their knowledge and capabilities.
This paper addresses the need for LLMs to recognize and refuse infeasible tasks due to the required skills surpassing their capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-11T22:58:23Z) - CoMMIT: Coordinated Instruction Tuning for Multimodal Large Language Models [68.64605538559312]
In this paper, we analyze the MLLM instruction tuning from both theoretical and empirical perspectives.
Inspired by our findings, we propose a measurement to quantitatively evaluate the learning balance.
In addition, we introduce an auxiliary loss regularization method to promote updating of the generation distribution of MLLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-29T23:18:55Z) - From Words to Actions: Unveiling the Theoretical Underpinnings of LLM-Driven Autonomous Systems [59.40480894948944]
Large language model (LLM) empowered agents are able to solve decision-making problems in the physical world.
Under this model, the LLM Planner navigates a partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP) by iteratively generating language-based subgoals via prompting.
We prove that the pretrained LLM Planner effectively performs Bayesian aggregated imitation learning (BAIL) through in-context learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-30T09:42:54Z) - Toward Self-Improvement of LLMs via Imagination, Searching, and Criticizing [56.75702900542643]
We introduce AlphaLLM for the self-improvements of Large Language Models.
It integrates Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) with LLMs to establish a self-improving loop.
Our experimental results show that AlphaLLM significantly enhances the performance of LLMs without additional annotations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-18T15:21:34Z) - Supervised Knowledge Makes Large Language Models Better In-context Learners [94.89301696512776]
Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit emerging in-context learning abilities through prompt engineering.
The challenge of improving the generalizability and factuality of LLMs in natural language understanding and question answering remains under-explored.
We propose a framework that enhances the reliability of LLMs as it: 1) generalizes out-of-distribution data, 2) elucidates how LLMs benefit from discriminative models, and 3) minimizes hallucinations in generative tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-26T07:24:46Z) - Response Length Perception and Sequence Scheduling: An LLM-Empowered LLM
Inference Pipeline [22.08897444328099]
Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the field of AI, demonstrating unprecedented capacity across various tasks.
In this paper, we propose an efficient LLM inference pipeline that harnesses the power of LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-22T15:36:06Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.