Data Efficient Evaluation of Large Language Models and Text-to-Image Models via Adaptive Sampling
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.15527v1
- Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 07:38:55 GMT
- Title: Data Efficient Evaluation of Large Language Models and Text-to-Image Models via Adaptive Sampling
- Authors: Cong Xu, Gayathri Saranathan, Mahammad Parwez Alam, Arpit Shah, James Lim, Soon Yee Wong, Foltin Martin, Suparna Bhattacharya,
- Abstract summary: SubLIME is a data-efficient evaluation framework for text-to-image models.
Our approach ensures statistically aligned model rankings compared to full datasets.
We leverage the HEIM leaderboard to cover 25 text-to-image models on 17 different benchmarks.
- Score: 3.7467864495337624
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Evaluating LLMs and text-to-image models is a computationally intensive task often overlooked. Efficient evaluation is crucial for understanding the diverse capabilities of these models and enabling comparisons across a growing number of new models and benchmarks. To address this, we introduce SubLIME, a data-efficient evaluation framework that employs adaptive sampling techniques, such as clustering and quality-based methods, to create representative subsets of benchmarks. Our approach ensures statistically aligned model rankings compared to full datasets, evidenced by high Pearson correlation coefficients. Empirical analysis across six NLP benchmarks reveals that: (1) quality-based sampling consistently achieves strong correlations (0.85 to 0.95) with full datasets at a 10\% sampling rate such as Quality SE and Quality CPD (2) clustering methods excel in specific benchmarks such as MMLU (3) no single method universally outperforms others across all metrics. Extending this framework, we leverage the HEIM leaderboard to cover 25 text-to-image models on 17 different benchmarks. SubLIME dynamically selects the optimal technique for each benchmark, significantly reducing evaluation costs while preserving ranking integrity and score distribution. Notably, a minimal sampling rate of 1% proves effective for benchmarks like MMLU. Additionally, we demonstrate that employing difficulty-based sampling to target more challenging benchmark segments enhances model differentiation with broader score distributions. We also combine semantic search, tool use, and GPT-4 review to identify redundancy across benchmarks within specific LLM categories, such as coding benchmarks. This allows us to further reduce the number of samples needed to maintain targeted rank preservation. Overall, SubLIME offers a versatile and cost-effective solution for the robust evaluation of LLMs and text-to-image models.
Related papers
- Beyond the Singular: The Essential Role of Multiple Generations in Effective Benchmark Evaluation and Analysis [10.133537818749291]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant utilities in real-world applications.
Benchmark evaluations are crucial for assessing the capabilities of LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-13T03:43:33Z) - A Distributed Collaborative Retrieval Framework Excelling in All Queries and Corpora based on Zero-shot Rank-Oriented Automatic Evaluation [46.33857318525812]
We propose a novel Distributed Collaborative Retrieval Framework (DCRF)
It integrates various retrieval models into a unified system and dynamically selects the optimal results for each user's query.
It can achieve performance comparable to effective listwise methods like RankGPT and ListT5.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-16T14:55:57Z) - ONEBench to Test Them All: Sample-Level Benchmarking Over Open-Ended Capabilities [30.123976500620834]
Traditional fixed test sets fall short in evaluating open-ended capabilities of foundation models.
We propose ONEBench, a new testing paradigm that consolidates individual evaluation datasets into a unified, ever-expanding sample pool.
By aggregating samples across test sets, ONEBench enables the assessment of diverse capabilities beyond those covered by the original test sets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-09T18:37:14Z) - Star-Agents: Automatic Data Optimization with LLM Agents for Instruction Tuning [71.2981957820888]
We propose a novel Star-Agents framework, which automates the enhancement of data quality across datasets.
The framework initially generates diverse instruction data with multiple LLM agents through a bespoke sampling method.
The generated data undergo a rigorous evaluation using a dual-model method that assesses both difficulty and quality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-21T02:30:53Z) - Constructing Domain-Specific Evaluation Sets for LLM-as-a-judge [15.980606104936365]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized the landscape of machine learning, yet current benchmarks often fall short in capturing the diverse behavior of these models in real-world applications.
Existing frameworks like Alpaca-Eval 2.0 LC citedubois2024lengthcontrolledalpacaevalsimpleway and Arena-Hard v0.1 citeli2024crowdsourced are limited by their focus on general-purpose queries and lack of diversity across domains such as law, medicine, and multilingual contexts.
We introduce a novel data pipeline that curates, domain-specific evaluation sets tailored for LLM-as
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-16T15:41:43Z) - Uncertainty Aware Learning for Language Model Alignment [97.36361196793929]
We propose uncertainty-aware learning (UAL) to improve the model alignment of different task scenarios.
We implement UAL in a simple fashion -- adaptively setting the label smoothing value of training according to the uncertainty of individual samples.
Experiments on widely used benchmarks demonstrate that our UAL significantly and consistently outperforms standard supervised fine-tuning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-07T11:37:45Z) - Benchmark Self-Evolving: A Multi-Agent Framework for Dynamic LLM
Evaluation [51.99752147380505]
This paper presents a benchmark self-evolving framework to dynamically evaluate Large Language Models (LLMs)
We utilize a multi-agent system to manipulate the context or question of original instances, reframing new evolving instances with high confidence.
Our framework widens performance discrepancies both between different models and within the same model across various tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-18T03:40:06Z) - How to Train Data-Efficient LLMs [56.41105687693619]
We study data-efficient approaches for pre-training language models (LLMs)
We find that Ask-LLM and Density sampling are the best methods in their respective categories.
In our comparison of 19 samplers, involving hundreds of evaluation tasks and pre-training runs, we find that Ask-LLM and Density are the best methods in their respective categories.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-15T02:27:57Z) - On the Evaluation and Refinement of Vision-Language Instruction Tuning
Datasets [71.54954966652286]
We try to evaluate the Vision-Language Instruction-Tuning (VLIT) datasets.
We build a new dataset, REVO-LION, by collecting samples with higher SQ from each dataset.
Remarkably, even with only half of the complete data, the model trained on REVO-LION can achieve the performance comparable to simply adding all VLIT datasets up.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-10T13:01:38Z) - GREAT Score: Global Robustness Evaluation of Adversarial Perturbation using Generative Models [60.48306899271866]
We present a new framework, called GREAT Score, for global robustness evaluation of adversarial perturbation using generative models.
We show high correlation and significantly reduced cost of GREAT Score when compared to the attack-based model ranking on RobustBench.
GREAT Score can be used for remote auditing of privacy-sensitive black-box models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-19T14:58:27Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.