MEReQ: Max-Ent Residual-Q Inverse RL for Sample-Efficient Alignment from Intervention

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.16258v1
• Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 01:51:09 GMT
• Title: MEReQ: Max-Ent Residual-Q Inverse RL for Sample-Efficient Alignment from Intervention
• Authors: Yuxin Chen, Chen Tang, Chenran Li, Ran Tian, Peter Stone, Masayoshi Tomizuka, Wei Zhan,
• Abstract summary: We introduce MEReQ (Maximum-Entropy Residual-Q Inverse Reinforcement Learning), designed for sample-efficient alignment from human intervention. MereQ infers a residual reward function that captures the discrepancy between the human expert's and the prior policy's underlying reward functions. It then employs Residual Q-Learning (RQL) to align the policy with human preferences using this residual reward function.
• Score: 81.56607128684723
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Aligning robot behavior with human preferences is crucial for deploying embodied AI agents in human-centered environments. A promising solution is interactive imitation learning from human intervention, where a human expert observes the policy's execution and provides interventions as feedback. However, existing methods often fail to utilize the prior policy efficiently to facilitate learning, thus hindering sample efficiency. In this work, we introduce MEReQ (Maximum-Entropy Residual-Q Inverse Reinforcement Learning), designed for sample-efficient alignment from human intervention. Instead of inferring the complete human behavior characteristics, MEReQ infers a residual reward function that captures the discrepancy between the human expert's and the prior policy's underlying reward functions. It then employs Residual Q-Learning (RQL) to align the policy with human preferences using this residual reward function. Extensive evaluations on simulated and real-world tasks demonstrate that MEReQ achieves sample-efficient policy alignment from human intervention.

Related papers

• Offline Risk-sensitive RL with Partial Observability to Enhance Performance in Human-Robot Teaming [1.3980986259786223]
  We propose a method to incorporate model uncertainty, thus enabling risk-sensitive sequential decision-making. Experiments were conducted with a group of twenty-six human participants within a simulated robot teleoperation environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-08T14:27:34Z)
• REBEL: A Regularization-Based Solution for Reward Overoptimization in Robotic Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback [61.54791065013767]
  A misalignment between the reward function and user intentions, values, or social norms can be catastrophic in the real world. Current methods to mitigate this misalignment work by learning reward functions from human preferences. We propose a novel concept of reward regularization within the robotic RLHF framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-22T04:56:37Z)
• Contrastive Preference Learning: Learning from Human Feedback without RL [71.77024922527642]
  We introduce Contrastive Preference Learning (CPL), an algorithm for learning optimal policies from preferences without learning reward functions. CPL is fully off-policy, uses only a simple contrastive objective, and can be applied to arbitrary MDPs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T16:37:56Z)
• Provable Benefits of Policy Learning from Human Preferences in Contextual Bandit Problems [82.92678837778358]
  preference-based methods have demonstrated substantial success in empirical applications such as InstructGPT. We show how human bias and uncertainty in feedback modelings can affect the theoretical guarantees of these approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-24T17:50:24Z)
• Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback: Learning Dynamic Choices via Pessimism [91.52263068880484]
  We study offline Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF) We aim to learn the human's underlying reward and the MDP's optimal policy from a set of trajectories induced by human choices. RLHF is challenging for multiple reasons: large state space but limited human feedback, the bounded rationality of human decisions, and the off-policy distribution shift.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-29T01:18:39Z)
• Deep RL with Hierarchical Action Exploration for Dialogue Generation [0.0]
  This paper presents theoretical analysis and experiments that reveal the performance of the dialogue policy is positively correlated with the sampling size. We introduce a novel dual-granularity Q-function that explores the most promising response category to intervene in the sampling process. Our algorithm exhibits both explainability and controllability and generates responses with higher expected rewards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-22T09:29:22Z)
• Learning Human Rewards by Inferring Their Latent Intelligence Levels in Multi-Agent Games: A Theory-of-Mind Approach with Application to Driving Data [18.750834997334664]
  We argue that humans are bounded rational and have different intelligence levels when reasoning about others' decision-making process. We propose a new multi-agent Inverse Reinforcement Learning framework that reasons about humans' latent intelligence levels during learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-07T07:48:31Z)
• Weak Human Preference Supervision For Deep Reinforcement Learning [48.03929962249475]
  The current reward learning from human preferences could be used to resolve complex reinforcement learning (RL) tasks without access to a reward function. We propose a weak human preference supervision framework, for which we developed a human preference scaling model. Our established human-demonstration estimator requires human feedback only for less than 0.01% of the agent's interactions with the environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-25T10:37:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.