Documentation Practices of Artificial Intelligence

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.18620v1
• Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 08:33:52 GMT
• Title: Documentation Practices of Artificial Intelligence
• Authors: Stefan Arnold, Dilara Yesilbas, Rene Gröbner, Dominik Riedelbauch, Maik Horn, Sven Weinzierl,
• Abstract summary: We provide an overview of prevailing trends, persistent issues, and the interplay of factors influencing the documentation. Our examination of key characteristics such as scope, target audiences, support for multimodality, and level of automation highlights a shift towards a more holistic, engaging, and automated documentation.
• Score: 0.5937476291232799
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Artificial Intelligence (AI) faces persistent challenges in terms of transparency and accountability, which requires rigorous documentation. Through a literature review on documentation practices, we provide an overview of prevailing trends, persistent issues, and the multifaceted interplay of factors influencing the documentation. Our examination of key characteristics such as scope, target audiences, support for multimodality, and level of automation, highlights a dynamic evolution in documentation practices, underscored by a shift towards a more holistic, engaging, and automated documentation.

Related papers

• MuDoC: An Interactive Multimodal Document-grounded Conversational AI System [4.7191037525744735]
  Building a multimodal document-grounded AI system to interact with long documents remains a challenge. We present an interactive conversational AI agent 'MuDoC' based on GPT-4o to generate document-grounded responses with interleaved text and figures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-14T01:05:51Z)
• DocMIA: Document-Level Membership Inference Attacks against DocVQA Models [52.13818827581981]
  We introduce two novel membership inference attacks tailored specifically to DocVQA models. Our methods outperform existing state-of-the-art membership inference attacks across a variety of DocVQA models and datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-06T00:58:21Z)
• From Exploration to Mastery: Enabling LLMs to Master Tools via Self-Driven Interactions [60.733557487886635]
  This paper focuses on bridging the comprehension gap between Large Language Models and external tools. We propose a novel framework, DRAFT, aimed at Dynamically refining tool documentation. Extensive experiments on multiple datasets demonstrate that DRAFT's iterative, feedback-based refinement significantly ameliorates documentation quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T17:58:44Z)
• On Task-personalized Multimodal Few-shot Learning for Visually-rich Document Entity Retrieval [59.25292920967197]
  Few-shot document entity retrieval (VDER) is an important topic in industrial NLP applications. FewVEX is a new dataset to boost future research in the field of entity-level few-shot VDER. We present a task-aware meta-learning based framework, with a central focus on achieving effective task personalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-01T17:51:43Z)
• Workshop on Document Intelligence Understanding [3.2929609168290543]
  This workshop aims to bring together researchers and industry developers in the field of document intelligence. We also released a data challenge on the recently introduced document-level VQA dataset, PDFVQA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-31T02:14:25Z)
• Peek Across: Improving Multi-Document Modeling via Cross-Document Question-Answering [49.85790367128085]
  We pre-training a generic multi-document model from a novel cross-document question answering pre-training objective. This novel multi-document QA formulation directs the model to better recover cross-text informational relations. Unlike prior multi-document models that focus on either classification or summarization tasks, our pre-training objective formulation enables the model to perform tasks that involve both short text generation and long text generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T17:48:40Z)
• HADES: Homologous Automated Document Exploration and Summarization [3.3509104620016092]
  HADES is designed to streamline the work of professionals dealing with large volumes of documents. The tool employs a multi-step pipeline that begins with processing PDF documents using topic modeling, summarization, and analysis of the most important words for each topic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-25T15:16:10Z)
• Unified Pretraining Framework for Document Understanding [52.224359498792836]
  We present UDoc, a new unified pretraining framework for document understanding. UDoc is designed to support most document understanding tasks, extending the Transformer to take multimodal embeddings as input. An important feature of UDoc is that it learns a generic representation by making use of three self-supervised losses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-22T21:47:04Z)
• Document AI: Benchmarks, Models and Applications [35.46858492311289]
  Document AI refers to the techniques for automatically reading, understanding, and analyzing business documents. In recent years, the popularity of deep learning technology has greatly advanced the development of Document AI. This paper briefly reviews some of the representative models, tasks, and benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-16T16:43:07Z)
• Extracting Procedural Knowledge from Technical Documents [1.0773368566852943]
  Procedures are an important knowledge component of documents that can be leveraged by cognitive assistants for automation, question-answering or driving a conversation. It is a challenging problem to parse big dense documents like product manuals, user guides to automatically understand which parts are talking about procedures and subsequently extract them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-20T09:47:52Z)
• Explaining Relationships Between Scientific Documents [55.23390424044378]
  We address the task of explaining relationships between two scientific documents using natural language text. In this paper we establish a dataset of 622K examples from 154K documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-02T03:54:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.