Core: Robust Factual Precision with Informative Sub-Claim Identification
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.03572v2
- Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 21:49:55 GMT
- Title: Core: Robust Factual Precision with Informative Sub-Claim Identification
- Authors: Zhengping Jiang, Jingyu Zhang, Nathaniel Weir, Seth Ebner, Miriam Wanner, Kate Sanders, Daniel Khashabi, Anqi Liu, Benjamin Van Durme,
- Abstract summary: We observe that popular metrics can be manipulated by adding obvious or repetitive subclaims to artificially inflate scores.
This observation motivates our new customizable plug-and-play subclaim selection component called Core.
We show that many popular factual precision metrics augmented by Core are substantially more robust on a wide range of knowledge domains.
- Score: 44.36892500212747
- License:
- Abstract: Hallucinations pose a challenge to the application of large language models (LLMs) thereby motivating the development of metrics to evaluate factual precision. We observe that popular metrics using the Decompose-Then-Verify framework, such as \FActScore, can be manipulated by adding obvious or repetitive subclaims to artificially inflate scores. This observation motivates our new customizable plug-and-play subclaim selection component called Core, which filters down individual subclaims according to their uniqueness and informativeness. We show that many popular factual precision metrics augmented by Core are substantially more robust on a wide range of knowledge domains. We release an evaluation framework supporting easy and modular use of Core and various decomposition strategies, which we recommend adoption by the community. We also release an expansion of the FActScore biography dataset to facilitate further studies of decomposition-based factual precision evaluation.
Related papers
- UniArk: Improving Generalisation and Consistency for Factual Knowledge Extraction through Debiasing [19.2764682793582]
We show the inherent misalignment between pre-training and downstream tuning objectives in language models for probing knowledge.
We propose an adapter-based framework, UniArk, for generalised and consistent factual knowledge extraction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-01T17:22:07Z) - Generating Benchmarks for Factuality Evaluation of Language Models [61.69950787311278]
We propose FACTOR: Factual Assessment via Corpus TransfORmation, a scalable approach for evaluating LM factuality.
FACTOR automatically transforms a factual corpus of interest into a benchmark evaluating an LM's propensity to generate true facts from the corpus vs. similar but incorrect statements.
We show that: (i) our benchmark scores increase with model size and improve when the LM is augmented with retrieval; (ii) benchmark score and perplexity do not always agree on model ranking; (iii) when perplexity and benchmark score disagree, the latter better reflects factuality in open-ended generation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-13T17:14:38Z) - Disentanglement via Latent Quantization [60.37109712033694]
In this work, we construct an inductive bias towards encoding to and decoding from an organized latent space.
We demonstrate the broad applicability of this approach by adding it to both basic data-re (vanilla autoencoder) and latent-reconstructing (InfoGAN) generative models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-28T06:30:29Z) - Preserving Knowledge Invariance: Rethinking Robustness Evaluation of
Open Information Extraction [50.62245481416744]
We present the first benchmark that simulates the evaluation of open information extraction models in the real world.
We design and annotate a large-scale testbed in which each example is a knowledge-invariant clique.
By further elaborating the robustness metric, a model is judged to be robust if its performance is consistently accurate on the overall cliques.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-23T12:05:09Z) - Adaptive Local-Component-aware Graph Convolutional Network for One-shot
Skeleton-based Action Recognition [54.23513799338309]
We present an Adaptive Local-Component-aware Graph Convolutional Network for skeleton-based action recognition.
Our method provides a stronger representation than the global embedding and helps our model reach state-of-the-art.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-21T02:33:07Z) - TRUE: Re-evaluating Factual Consistency Evaluation [29.888885917330327]
We introduce TRUE: a comprehensive study of factual consistency metrics on a standardized collection of existing texts from diverse tasks.
Our standardization enables an example-level meta-evaluation protocol that is more actionable and interpretable than previously reported correlations.
Across diverse state-of-the-art metrics and 11 datasets we find that large-scale NLI and question generation-and-answering-based approaches achieve strong and complementary results.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-11T10:14:35Z) - Bayesian Attention Modules [65.52970388117923]
We propose a scalable version of attention that is easy to implement and optimize.
Our experiments show the proposed method brings consistent improvements over the corresponding baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-20T20:30:55Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.