More Distinctively Black and Feminine Faces Lead to Increased Stereotyping in Vision-Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.06194v1
- Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 00:45:29 GMT
- Title: More Distinctively Black and Feminine Faces Lead to Increased Stereotyping in Vision-Language Models
- Authors: Messi H. J. Lee, Jacob M. Montgomery, Calvin K. Lai,
- Abstract summary: This study explores how Vision Language Models (VLMs) perpetuate homogeneity bias and trait associations with regards to race and gender.
VLMs may associate subtle visual cues related to racial and gender groups with stereotypes in ways that could be challenging to mitigate.
- Score: 0.30723404270319693
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Vision Language Models (VLMs), exemplified by GPT-4V, adeptly integrate text and vision modalities. This integration enhances Large Language Models' ability to mimic human perception, allowing them to process image inputs. Despite VLMs' advanced capabilities, however, there is a concern that VLMs inherit biases of both modalities in ways that make biases more pervasive and difficult to mitigate. Our study explores how VLMs perpetuate homogeneity bias and trait associations with regards to race and gender. When prompted to write stories based on images of human faces, GPT-4V describes subordinate racial and gender groups with greater homogeneity than dominant groups and relies on distinct, yet generally positive, stereotypes. Importantly, VLM stereotyping is driven by visual cues rather than group membership alone such that faces that are rated as more prototypically Black and feminine are subject to greater stereotyping. These findings suggest that VLMs may associate subtle visual cues related to racial and gender groups with stereotypes in ways that could be challenging to mitigate. We explore the underlying reasons behind this behavior and discuss its implications and emphasize the importance of addressing these biases as VLMs come to mirror human perception.
Related papers
- See It from My Perspective: Diagnosing the Western Cultural Bias of Large Vision-Language Models in Image Understanding [78.88461026069862]
Vision-language models (VLMs) can respond to queries about images in many languages.
We present a novel investigation that demonstrates and localizes Western bias in image understanding.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-17T15:49:51Z) - An Introduction to Vision-Language Modeling [128.6223984157515]
The vision-language model (VLM) applications will significantly impact our relationship with technology.
We introduce what VLMs are, how they work, and how to train them.
Although this work primarily focuses on mapping images to language, we also discuss extending VLMs to videos.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-27T15:01:23Z) - Protected group bias and stereotypes in Large Language Models [2.1122940074160357]
This paper investigates the behavior of Large Language Models (LLMs) in the domains of ethics and fairness.
We find bias across minoritized groups, but in particular in the domains of gender and sexuality, as well as Western bias.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-21T00:21:38Z) - Large Language Models Portray Socially Subordinate Groups as More Homogeneous, Consistent with a Bias Observed in Humans [0.30723404270319693]
We investigate a new form of bias in large language models (LLMs)
We find that ChatGPT portrayed African, Asian, and Hispanic Americans as more homogeneous than White Americans.
We argue that the tendency to describe groups as less diverse risks perpetuating stereotypes and discriminatory behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-16T16:52:00Z) - Aligning with Whom? Large Language Models Have Gender and Racial Biases
in Subjective NLP Tasks [15.015148115215315]
We conduct experiments on four popular large language models (LLMs) to investigate their capability to understand group differences and potential biases in their predictions for politeness and offensiveness.
We find that for both tasks, model predictions are closer to the labels from White and female participants.
More specifically, when being prompted to respond from the perspective of "Black" and "Asian" individuals, models show lower performance in predicting both overall scores as well as the scores from corresponding groups.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-16T10:02:24Z) - Bias Runs Deep: Implicit Reasoning Biases in Persona-Assigned LLMs [67.51906565969227]
We study the unintended side-effects of persona assignment on the ability of LLMs to perform basic reasoning tasks.
Our study covers 24 reasoning datasets, 4 LLMs, and 19 diverse personas (e.g. an Asian person) spanning 5 socio-demographic groups.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-08T18:52:17Z) - Marked Personas: Using Natural Language Prompts to Measure Stereotypes
in Language Models [33.157279170602784]
We present Marked Personas, a prompt-based method to measure stereotypes in large language models (LLMs)
We find that portrayals generated by GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 contain higher rates of racial stereotypes than human-written portrayals using the same prompts.
An intersectional lens reveals tropes that dominate portrayals of marginalized groups, such as tropicalism and the hypersexualization of minoritized women.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-29T16:29:22Z) - On Evaluating Adversarial Robustness of Large Vision-Language Models [64.66104342002882]
We evaluate the robustness of large vision-language models (VLMs) in the most realistic and high-risk setting.
In particular, we first craft targeted adversarial examples against pretrained models such as CLIP and BLIP.
Black-box queries on these VLMs can further improve the effectiveness of targeted evasion.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-26T13:49:44Z) - Easily Accessible Text-to-Image Generation Amplifies Demographic
Stereotypes at Large Scale [61.555788332182395]
We investigate the potential for machine learning models to amplify dangerous and complex stereotypes.
We find a broad range of ordinary prompts produce stereotypes, including prompts simply mentioning traits, descriptors, occupations, or objects.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-07T18:31:07Z) - Towards Understanding and Mitigating Social Biases in Language Models [107.82654101403264]
Large-scale pretrained language models (LMs) can be potentially dangerous in manifesting undesirable representational biases.
We propose steps towards mitigating social biases during text generation.
Our empirical results and human evaluation demonstrate effectiveness in mitigating bias while retaining crucial contextual information.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-24T17:52:43Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.