Cohesive Conversations: Enhancing Authenticity in Multi-Agent Simulated Dialogues

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.09897v2
• Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2024 17:31:22 GMT
• Title: Cohesive Conversations: Enhancing Authenticity in Multi-Agent Simulated Dialogues
• Authors: KuanChao Chu, Yi-Pei Chen, Hideki Nakayama,
• Abstract summary: This paper investigates the quality of multi-agent dialogues in simulations powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) We propose a novel Screening, Diagnosis, and Regeneration (SDR) framework that detects and corrects utterance errors.
• Score: 17.38671584773247
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This paper investigates the quality of multi-agent dialogues in simulations powered by Large Language Models (LLMs). Analyzing dialogues and memory over multiple sessions revealed significant issues such as repetition, inconsistency, and hallucination, exacerbated by the propagation of erroneous information. To combat these challenges, we propose a novel Screening, Diagnosis, and Regeneration (SDR) framework that detects and corrects utterance errors through a comprehensive process involving immediate issue identification, evidence gathering from past dialogues, and LLM analysis for utterance revision. By incorporating our SDR framework to Generative Agents (Park et al., 2023), we enhance the diversity, consistency, and factualness of the generated dialogues. This work presents a pioneering approach to enhancing dialogue quality in multi-agent simulations, establishing a new standard for future research in the field.

Related papers

• An LLM Benchmark for Addressee Recognition in Multi-modal Multi-party Dialogue [21.938414385824903]
  This paper focuses on the task of addressee recognition, identifying who is being addressed to take the next turn. A subset of the corpus was annotated with addressee information, revealing that explicit addressees are indicated in approximately 20% of conversational turns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-28T02:27:55Z)
• Evaluating Robustness of Dialogue Summarization Models in the Presence of Naturally Occurring Variations [13.749495524988774]
  We systematically investigate the impact of real-life variations on state-of-the-art dialogue summarization models. We introduce two types of perturbations: utterance-level perturbations that modify individual utterances with errors and language variations, and dialogue-level perturbations that add non-informative exchanges. We find that both fine-tuned and instruction-tuned models are affected by input variations, with the latter being more susceptible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T05:11:43Z)
• Self-Explanation Prompting Improves Dialogue Understanding in Large Language Models [52.24756457516834]
  We propose a novel "Self-Explanation" prompting strategy to enhance the comprehension abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) This task-agnostic approach requires the model to analyze each dialogue utterance before task execution, thereby improving performance across various dialogue-centric tasks. Experimental results from six benchmark datasets confirm that our method consistently outperforms other zero-shot prompts and matches or exceeds the efficacy of few-shot prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-22T15:41:34Z)
• PICK: Polished & Informed Candidate Scoring for Knowledge-Grounded Dialogue Systems [59.1250765143521]
  Current knowledge-grounded dialogue systems often fail to align the generated responses with human-preferred qualities. We propose Polished & Informed Candidate Scoring (PICK), a generation re-scoring framework. We demonstrate the effectiveness of PICK in generating responses that are more faithful while keeping them relevant to the dialogue history.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-19T08:27:09Z)
• Dialogue Agents 101: A Beginner's Guide to Critical Ingredients for Designing Effective Conversational Systems [29.394466123216258]
  This study provides a comprehensive overview of the primary characteristics of a dialogue agent, their corresponding open-domain datasets, and the methods used to benchmark these datasets. We propose UNIT, a UNified dIalogue dataseT constructed from conversations of existing datasets for different dialogue tasks capturing the nuances for each of them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-14T10:05:47Z)
• EM Pre-training for Multi-party Dialogue Response Generation [86.25289241604199]
  In multi-party dialogues, the addressee of a response utterance should be specified before it is generated. We propose an Expectation-Maximization (EM) approach that iteratively performs the expectation steps to generate addressee labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-21T09:22:41Z)
• Controllable Mixed-Initiative Dialogue Generation through Prompting [50.03458333265885]
  Mixed-initiative dialogue tasks involve repeated exchanges of information and conversational control. Agents gain control by generating responses that follow particular dialogue intents or strategies, prescribed by a policy planner. Standard approach has been fine-tuning pre-trained language models to perform generation conditioned on these intents. We instead prompt large language models as a drop-in replacement to fine-tuning on conditional generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-06T23:11:25Z)
• I like fish, especially dolphins: Addressing Contradictions in Dialogue Modeling [104.09033240889106]
  We introduce the DialoguE COntradiction DEtection task (DECODE) and a new conversational dataset containing both human-human and human-bot contradictory dialogues. We then compare a structured utterance-based approach of using pre-trained Transformer models for contradiction detection with the typical unstructured approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-24T18:47:49Z)
• Filling the Gap of Utterance-aware and Speaker-aware Representation for Multi-turn Dialogue [76.88174667929665]
  A multi-turn dialogue is composed of multiple utterances from two or more different speaker roles. In the existing retrieval-based multi-turn dialogue modeling, the pre-trained language models (PrLMs) as encoder represent the dialogues coarsely. We propose a novel model to fill such a gap by modeling the effective utterance-aware and speaker-aware representations entailed in a dialogue history.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-14T15:07:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.