Evaluating Task-Oriented Dialogue Consistency through Constraint Satisfaction

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.11857v1
• Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 15:38:41 GMT
• Title: Evaluating Task-Oriented Dialogue Consistency through Constraint Satisfaction
• Authors: Tiziano Labruna, Bernardo Magnini,
• Abstract summary: We propose to conceptualize dialogue consistency as a Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP) We utilize a CSP solver to detect inconsistencies in dialogues re-lexicalized by an LLM. We argue that CSP captures core properties of dialogue consistency that have been poorly considered by approaches based on component pipelines.
• Score: 1.4272411349249625
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Task-oriented dialogues must maintain consistency both within the dialogue itself, ensuring logical coherence across turns, and with the conversational domain, accurately reflecting external knowledge. We propose to conceptualize dialogue consistency as a Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP), wherein variables represent segments of the dialogue referencing the conversational domain, and constraints among variables reflect dialogue properties, including linguistic, conversational, and domain-based aspects. To demonstrate the feasibility of the approach, we utilize a CSP solver to detect inconsistencies in dialogues re-lexicalized by an LLM. Our findings indicate that: (i) CSP is effective to detect dialogue inconsistencies; and (ii) consistent dialogue re-lexicalization is challenging for state-of-the-art LLMs, achieving only a 0.15 accuracy rate when compared to a CSP solver. Furthermore, through an ablation study, we reveal that constraints derived from domain knowledge pose the greatest difficulty in being respected. We argue that CSP captures core properties of dialogue consistency that have been poorly considered by approaches based on component pipelines.

Related papers

• Context Does Matter: Implications for Crowdsourced Evaluation Labels in Task-Oriented Dialogue Systems [57.16442740983528]
  Crowdsourced labels play a crucial role in evaluating task-oriented dialogue systems. Previous studies suggest using only a portion of the dialogue context in the annotation process. This study investigates the influence of dialogue context on annotation quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-15T17:56:39Z)
• Inconsistent dialogue responses and how to recover from them [45.933921383946576]
  One critical issue for chat systems is to stay consistent about preferences, opinions, beliefs and facts of itself. In this work, we study methods to assess and bolster utterance consistency of chat systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-18T19:46:04Z)
• Exploring the Factual Consistency in Dialogue Comprehension of Large Language Models [51.75805497456226]
  This work focuses on the factual consistency issue with the help of the dialogue summarization task. Our evaluation shows that, on average, 26.8% of the summaries generated by LLMs contain factual inconsistency. To stimulate and enhance the dialogue comprehension ability of LLMs, we propose a fine-tuning paradigm with auto-constructed multi-task data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T09:32:12Z)
• Are cascade dialogue state tracking models speaking out of turn in spoken dialogues? [1.786898113631979]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of the errors of state of the art systems in complex settings such as Dialogue State Tracking. Based on spoken MultiWoz, we identify that errors on non-categorical slots' values are essential to address in order to bridge the gap between spoken and chat-based dialogue systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-03T08:45:22Z)
• DialogueCSE: Dialogue-based Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddings [33.89889949577356]
  We propose DialogueCSE, a dialogue-based contrastive learning approach to tackle this issue. We evaluate our model on three multi-turn dialogue datasets: the Microsoft Dialogue Corpus, the Jing Dong Dialogue Corpus, and the E-commerce Dialogue Corpus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-26T13:25:41Z)
• Self-supervised Dialogue Learning for Spoken Conversational Question Answering [29.545937716796082]
  In spoken conversational question answering (SCQA), the answer to the corresponding question is generated by retrieving and then analyzing a fixed spoken document, including multi-part conversations. We introduce a self-supervised learning approach, including incoherence discrimination, insertion detection, and question prediction, to explicitly capture the coreference resolution and dialogue coherence. Our proposed method provides more coherent, meaningful, and appropriate responses, yielding superior performance gains compared to the original pre-trained language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-04T00:09:38Z)
• I like fish, especially dolphins: Addressing Contradictions in Dialogue Modeling [104.09033240889106]
  We introduce the DialoguE COntradiction DEtection task (DECODE) and a new conversational dataset containing both human-human and human-bot contradictory dialogues. We then compare a structured utterance-based approach of using pre-trained Transformer models for contradiction detection with the typical unstructured approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-24T18:47:49Z)
• Is this Dialogue Coherent? Learning from Dialogue Acts and Entities [82.44143808977209]
  We create the Switchboard Coherence (SWBD-Coh) corpus, a dataset of human-human spoken dialogues annotated with turn coherence ratings. Our statistical analysis of the corpus indicates how turn coherence perception is affected by patterns of distribution of entities. We find that models combining both DA and entity information yield the best performances both for response selection and turn coherence rating.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-17T21:02:40Z)
• Rethinking Dialogue State Tracking with Reasoning [76.0991910623001]
  This paper proposes to track dialogue states gradually with reasoning over dialogue turns with the help of the back-end data. Empirical results demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art methods by 38.6% in terms of joint belief accuracy for MultiWOZ 2.1.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-27T02:05:33Z)
• Dialogue-Based Relation Extraction [53.2896545819799]
  We present the first human-annotated dialogue-based relation extraction (RE) dataset DialogRE. We argue that speaker-related information plays a critical role in the proposed task, based on an analysis of similarities and differences between dialogue-based and traditional RE tasks. Experimental results demonstrate that a speaker-aware extension on the best-performing model leads to gains in both the standard and conversational evaluation settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-17T03:51:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.