Human-Interpretable Adversarial Prompt Attack on Large Language Models with Situational Context

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.14644v2
• Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 22:44:54 GMT
• Title: Human-Interpretable Adversarial Prompt Attack on Large Language Models with Situational Context
• Authors: Nilanjana Das, Edward Raff, Manas Gaur,
• Abstract summary: This research explores converting a nonsensical suffix attack into a sensible prompt via a situation-driven contextual re-writing. We combine an independent, meaningful adversarial insertion and situations derived from movies to check if this can trick an LLM. Our approach demonstrates that a successful situation-driven attack can be executed on both open-source and proprietary LLMs.
• Score: 49.13497493053742
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Previous research on testing the vulnerabilities in Large Language Models (LLMs) using adversarial attacks has primarily focused on nonsensical prompt injections, which are easily detected upon manual or automated review (e.g., via byte entropy). However, the exploration of innocuous human-understandable malicious prompts augmented with adversarial injections remains limited. In this research, we explore converting a nonsensical suffix attack into a sensible prompt via a situation-driven contextual re-writing. This allows us to show suffix conversion without any gradients, using only LLMs to perform the attacks, and thus better understand the scope of possible risks. We combine an independent, meaningful adversarial insertion and situations derived from movies to check if this can trick an LLM. The situations are extracted from the IMDB dataset, and prompts are defined following a few-shot chain-of-thought prompting. Our approach demonstrates that a successful situation-driven attack can be executed on both open-source and proprietary LLMs. We find that across many LLMs, as few as 1 attempt produces an attack and that these attacks transfer between LLMs.

Related papers

• UniGuardian: A Unified Defense for Detecting Prompt Injection, Backdoor Attacks and Adversarial Attacks in Large Language Models [30.139590566956077]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to attacks like prompt injection, backdoor attacks, and adversarial attacks. We propose UniGuardian, the first unified defense mechanism designed to detect prompt injection, backdoor attacks, and adversarial attacks in LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T18:59:00Z)
• `Do as I say not as I do': A Semi-Automated Approach for Jailbreak Prompt Attack against Multimodal LLMs [6.151779089440453]
  We introduce the first voice-based jailbreak attack against multimodal large language models (LLMs) We propose a novel strategy, in which the disallowed prompt is flanked by benign, narrative-driven prompts. We demonstrate that Flanking Attack is capable of manipulating state-of-the-art LLMs into generating misaligned and forbidden outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-02T10:05:08Z)
• Human-Readable Adversarial Prompts: An Investigation into LLM Vulnerabilities Using Situational Context [49.13497493053742]
  Previous research on LLM vulnerabilities often relied on nonsensical adversarial prompts, which were easily detectable by automated methods. We address this gap by focusing on human-readable adversarial prompts, a more realistic and potent threat. Our key contributions are situation-driven attacks leveraging movie scripts to create contextually relevant, human-readable prompts that successfully deceive LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-20T21:43:52Z)
• Denial-of-Service Poisoning Attacks against Large Language Models [64.77355353440691]
  LLMs are vulnerable to denial-of-service (DoS) attacks, where spelling errors or non-semantic prompts trigger endless outputs without generating an [EOS] token. We propose poisoning-based DoS attacks for LLMs, demonstrating that injecting a single poisoned sample designed for DoS purposes can break the output length limit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T17:39:31Z)
• Defending Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks With Spotlighting [11.127479817618692]
  In common applications, multiple inputs can be processed by concatenating them together into a single stream of text. Indirect prompt injection attacks take advantage of this vulnerability by embedding adversarial instructions into untrusted data being processed alongside user commands. We introduce spotlighting, a family of prompt engineering techniques that can be used to improve LLMs' ability to distinguish among multiple sources of input.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-20T15:26:23Z)
• ASETF: A Novel Method for Jailbreak Attack on LLMs through Translate Suffix Embeddings [58.82536530615557]
  We propose an Adversarial Suffix Embedding Translation Framework (ASETF) to transform continuous adversarial suffix embeddings into coherent and understandable text. Our method significantly reduces the computation time of adversarial suffixes and achieves a much better attack success rate to existing techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-25T06:46:27Z)
• Coercing LLMs to do and reveal (almost) anything [80.8601180293558]
  It has been shown that adversarial attacks on large language models (LLMs) can "jailbreak" the model into making harmful statements. We argue that the spectrum of adversarial attacks on LLMs is much larger than merely jailbreaking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T18:59:13Z)
• SmoothLLM: Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreaking Attacks [99.23352758320945]
  We propose SmoothLLM, the first algorithm designed to mitigate jailbreaking attacks on large language models (LLMs) Based on our finding that adversarially-generated prompts are brittle to character-level changes, our defense first randomly perturbs multiple copies of a given input prompt, and then aggregates the corresponding predictions to detect adversarial inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-05T17:01:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.