Is Behavior Cloning All You Need? Understanding Horizon in Imitation Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.15007v1
• Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 23:31:56 GMT
• Title: Is Behavior Cloning All You Need? Understanding Horizon in Imitation Learning
• Authors: Dylan J. Foster, Adam Block, Dipendra Misra,
• Abstract summary: Imitation learning (IL) aims to mimic the behavior of an expert in a sequential decision making task by learning from demonstrations. Online behavior cloning (BC) is thought to incur sample complexity with unfavorable quadratic dependence on the problem horizon. We show that it is possible to achieve horizon-independent sample complexity in offline IL whenever the range of the cumulative payoffs is controlled.
• Score: 26.53136644321385
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Imitation learning (IL) aims to mimic the behavior of an expert in a sequential decision making task by learning from demonstrations, and has been widely applied to robotics, autonomous driving, and autoregressive text generation. The simplest approach to IL, behavior cloning (BC), is thought to incur sample complexity with unfavorable quadratic dependence on the problem horizon, motivating a variety of different online algorithms that attain improved linear horizon dependence under stronger assumptions on the data and the learner's access to the expert. We revisit the apparent gap between offline and online IL from a learning-theoretic perspective, with a focus on general policy classes up to and including deep neural networks. Through a new analysis of behavior cloning with the logarithmic loss, we show that it is possible to achieve horizon-independent sample complexity in offline IL whenever (i) the range of the cumulative payoffs is controlled, and (ii) an appropriate notion of supervised learning complexity for the policy class is controlled. Specializing our results to deterministic, stationary policies, we show that the gap between offline and online IL is not fundamental: (i) it is possible to achieve linear dependence on horizon in offline IL under dense rewards (matching what was previously only known to be achievable in online IL); and (ii) without further assumptions on the policy class, online IL cannot improve over offline IL with the logarithmic loss, even in benign MDPs. We complement our theoretical results with experiments on standard RL tasks and autoregressive language generation to validate the practical relevance of our findings.

Related papers

• Understanding the performance gap between online and offline alignment algorithms [63.137832242488926]
  We show that offline algorithms train policy to become good at pairwise classification, while online algorithms are good at generations. This hints at a unique interplay between discriminative and generative capabilities, which is greatly impacted by the sampling process. Our study sheds light on the pivotal role of on-policy sampling in AI alignment, and hints at certain fundamental challenges of offline alignment algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-14T09:12:30Z)
• Discriminator-Weighted Offline Imitation Learning from Suboptimal Demonstrations [5.760034336327491]
  We study the problem of offline Learning (IL) where an agent aims to learn an optimal expert behavior policy without additional online environment interactions. We introduce an additional discriminator to distinguish expert and non-expert data. Our proposed algorithm achieves higher returns and faster training speed compared to baseline algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-20T17:29:04Z)
• Offline Stochastic Shortest Path: Learning, Evaluation and Towards Optimality [57.91411772725183]
  In this paper, we consider the offline shortest path problem when the state space and the action space are finite. We design the simple value-based algorithms for tackling both offline policy evaluation (OPE) and offline policy learning tasks. Our analysis of these simple algorithms yields strong instance-dependent bounds which can imply worst-case bounds that are near-minimax optimal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-10T07:44:56Z)
• Offline Reinforcement Learning: Fundamental Barriers for Value Function Approximation [74.3002974673248]
  We consider the offline reinforcement learning problem, where the aim is to learn a decision making policy from logged data. offline RL is becoming increasingly relevant in practice, because online data collection is well suited to safety-critical domains. Our results show that sample-efficient offline reinforcement learning requires either restrictive coverage conditions or representation conditions that go beyond complexity learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-21T23:22:37Z)
• Curriculum Offline Imitation Learning [72.1015201041391]
  offline reinforcement learning tasks require the agent to learn from a pre-collected dataset with no further interactions with the environment. We propose textitCurriculum Offline Learning (COIL), which utilizes an experience picking strategy for imitating from adaptive neighboring policies with a higher return. On continuous control benchmarks, we compare COIL against both imitation-based and RL-based methods, showing that it not only avoids just learning a mediocre behavior on mixed datasets but is also even competitive with state-of-the-art offline RL methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-03T08:02:48Z)
• Mitigating Covariate Shift in Imitation Learning via Offline Data Without Great Coverage [27.122391441921664]
  This paper studies offline Imitation Learning (IL) where an agent learns to imitate an expert demonstrator without additional online environment interactions. Instead, the learner is presented with a static offline dataset of state-action-next state transition triples from a potentially less proficient behavior policy. We introduce Model-based IL from Offline data (MILO) to solve the offline IL problem efficiently both in theory and in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-06T18:31:08Z)
• Representation Matters: Offline Pretraining for Sequential Decision Making [27.74988221252854]
  In this paper, we consider a slightly different approach to incorporating offline data into sequential decision-making. We find that the use of pretraining with unsupervised learning objectives can dramatically improve the performance of policy learning algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-11T02:38:12Z)
• What are the Statistical Limits of Offline RL with Linear Function Approximation? [70.33301077240763]
  offline reinforcement learning seeks to utilize offline (observational) data to guide the learning of sequential decision making strategies. This work focuses on the basic question of what are necessary representational and distributional conditions that permit provable sample-efficient offline reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T17:32:13Z)
• Strictly Batch Imitation Learning by Energy-based Distribution Matching [104.33286163090179]
  Consider learning a policy purely on the basis of demonstrated behavior -- that is, with no access to reinforcement signals, no knowledge of transition dynamics, and no further interaction with the environment. One solution is simply to retrofit existing algorithms for apprenticeship learning to work in the offline setting. But such an approach leans heavily on off-policy evaluation or offline model estimation, and can be indirect and inefficient. We argue that a good solution should be able to explicitly parameterize a policy, implicitly learn from rollout dynamics, and operate in an entirely offline fashion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-25T03:27:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.