MIBench: Evaluating Multimodal Large Language Models over Multiple Images

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.15272v2
• Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 07:18:21 GMT
• Title: MIBench: Evaluating Multimodal Large Language Models over Multiple Images
• Authors: Haowei Liu, Xi Zhang, Haiyang Xu, Yaya Shi, Chaoya Jiang, Ming Yan, Ji Zhang, Fei Huang, Chunfeng Yuan, Bing Li, Weiming Hu,
• Abstract summary: We propose a new benchmark MIBench, to comprehensively evaluate fine-grained abilities of MLLMs in multi-image scenarios. Specifically, MIBench categorizes the multi-image abilities into three scenarios: multi-image instruction (MII), multimodal knowledge-seeking (MKS) and multimodal in-context learning (MIC) The results reveal that although current models excel in single-image tasks, they exhibit significant shortcomings when faced with multi-image inputs.
• Score: 70.44423964171088
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Built on the power of LLMs, numerous multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have recently achieved remarkable performance on various vision-language tasks. However, most existing MLLMs and benchmarks primarily focus on single-image input scenarios, leaving the performance of MLLMs when handling realistic multiple images underexplored. Although a few benchmarks consider multiple images, their evaluation dimensions and samples are very limited. In this paper, we propose a new benchmark MIBench, to comprehensively evaluate fine-grained abilities of MLLMs in multi-image scenarios. Specifically, MIBench categorizes the multi-image abilities into three scenarios: multi-image instruction (MII), multimodal knowledge-seeking (MKS) and multimodal in-context learning (MIC), and constructs 13 tasks with a total of 13K annotated samples. During data construction, for MII and MKS, we extract correct options from manual annotations and create challenging distractors to obtain multiple-choice questions. For MIC, to enable an in-depth evaluation, we set four sub-tasks and transform the original datasets into in-context learning formats. We evaluate several open-source and closed-source MLLMs on the proposed MIBench. The results reveal that although current models excel in single-image tasks, they exhibit significant shortcomings when faced with multi-image inputs, such as limited fine-grained perception, multi-image reasoning and in-context learning abilities. The annotated data of MIBench is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/StarBottle/MIBench.

Related papers

• Order Matters: Exploring Order Sensitivity in Multimodal Large Language Models [15.622219099903067]
  We find that changing the order of multimodal input can cause the model's performance to fluctuate between advanced performance and random guessing. This phenomenon exists in both single-modality (text-only or image-only) and mixed-modality (image-text-pair) contexts. We propose a new metric, Position-Invariant Accuracy (PIA), to address order bias in MLLM evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T13:05:11Z)
• MC-Bench: A Benchmark for Multi-Context Visual Grounding in the Era of MLLMs [61.56904387052982]
  This paper proposes a new visual grounding task called multi-context visual grounding. It aims to localize instances of interest across multiple images based on open-ended text prompts. We benchmark over 20 state-of-the-art MLLMs and foundation models with potential multi-context visual grounding capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T07:52:57Z)
• LLaVA-NeXT-Interleave: Tackling Multi-image, Video, and 3D in Large Multimodal Models [70.2997884478129]
  We introduce LLaVA-NeXT-Interleave, which simultaneously tackles Multi-image, Multi-frame (video), Multi-view (3D), and Multi-patch (single-image) scenarios in LMMs. We also curate the LLaVA-Interleave Bench to comprehensively evaluate the multi-image performance of LMMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-10T17:59:43Z)
• Multimodal Needle in a Haystack: Benchmarking Long-Context Capability of Multimodal Large Language Models [10.41857522464292]
  We introduce the MultiModal Needle-in-a-haystack (MMNeedle) benchmark to assess the long-context capabilities of MLLMs. We employ image stitching to further increase the input context length, and develop a protocol to automatically generate labels for sub-image level retrieval. We evaluate state-of-the-art MLLMs, encompassing both API-based and open-source models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T05:54:06Z)
• MuirBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Robust Multi-image Understanding [150.28164854480912]
  We introduce MuirBench, a benchmark that focuses on robust multi-image understanding capabilities of multimodal LLMs. MuirBench consists of 12 diverse multi-image tasks (e.g., scene understanding, ordering) that involve 10 categories of multi-image relations. We show that even the best-performing models like GPT-4o and Gemini Pro find it challenging to solve MuirBench, achieving 68.0% and 49.3% in accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T17:59:52Z)
• MileBench: Benchmarking MLLMs in Long Context [31.211260223575092]
  We introduce MileBench, a benchmark designed to test the MultImodal Long-contExt capabilities of MLLMs. We systematically assess MLLMs' long-context adaptation capacity and their ability to complete tasks in long-context scenarios. Results show that while the closed-source GPT-4o outperforms others, most open-source MLLMs struggle in long-context situations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-29T09:19:05Z)
• SEED-Bench-2: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models [67.28089415198338]
  Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have recently demonstrated exceptional capabilities in generating not only texts but also images given interleaved multimodal inputs. SEED-Bench-2 comprises 24K multiple-choice questions with accurate human annotations, which spans 27 dimensions. We evaluate the performance of 23 prominent open-source MLLMs and summarize valuable observations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-28T05:53:55Z)
• MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models [73.86954509967416]
  Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) relies on the powerful LLM to perform multimodal tasks. This paper presents the first comprehensive MLLM Evaluation benchmark MME. It measures both perception and cognition abilities on a total of 14 subtasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-23T09:22:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.