KI-Bilder und die Widerständigkeit der Medienkonvergenz: Von primärer zu sekundärer Intermedialität?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.18363v1
• Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 09:15:19 GMT
• Title: KI-Bilder und die Widerständigkeit der Medienkonvergenz: Von primärer zu sekundärer Intermedialität?
• Authors: Lukas R. A. Wilde,
• Abstract summary: Article presents some current observations on the integration of AI-generated images within processes of media convergence. It draws on two different concepts of intermediality: primary intermediality and secondary intermediality. The thesis is that there can be no talk of a seamless 'integration' of AI images into the wider media landscape at the moment.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The article presents some current observations (as of April 10, 2024) on the integration of AI-generated images within processes of media convergence. It draws on two different concepts of intermediality. Primary intermediality concepts are motivated by the object when a new type of technology develops the potential to become socially relevant as a media form and thus a socially, politically, or culturally important communicative factor. Due to their uncertain 'measurements' within the wider media ecology, however, the new, still potential media form appears hybrid. The "inter-" or "between-" of this initial intermediality moment thus refers to the questionable "site" and the questionable description of the potential media form between already existing technologies and cultural forms and their conceptual measurements. For secondary concepts of intermediality, in contrast, it can be assumed that the boundaries of media forms and their application have already been drawn and are reasonably undisputed. This then raises the question of intentional and staged references to AI imagery within other media forms and pictures. The article discusses indicators of both intermediality moments using current examples and controversies surrounding AI images. The thesis is that there can be no talk of a seamless 'integration' of AI images into the wider media landscape at the moment (within films, comic books, or video games, for example) - as one of countless other image production techniques - and that the medial 'site' of AI image circulation - at least where it is not a matter of deception, but rather their conscious use as AI images - especially in social media communication and in fan cultures, but with repercussions for the more general media ecology and image interpretation, insofar as the suspicion that an image could be AI-generated is now increasingly present as a "hermeneutics of suspicion".

Related papers

• Bridging Cognition and Emotion: Empathy-Driven Multimodal Misinformation Detection [56.644686934050576]
  Social media has become a major conduit for information dissemination, yet it also facilitates the rapid spread of misinformation. Traditional misinformation detection methods primarily focus on surface-level features, overlooking the crucial roles of human empathy in the propagation process. We propose the Dual-Aspect Empathy Framework (DAE), which integrates cognitive and emotional empathy to analyze misinformation from both the creator and reader perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-24T07:48:26Z)
• Regulating Reality: Exploring Synthetic Media Through Multistakeholder AI Governance [1.450405446885067]
  This paper analyzes 23 in-depth, semi-structured interviews with stakeholders governing synthetic media from across sectors. It reveals key themes affecting synthetic media governance, including how temporal perspectives-spanning past, present, and future. It also reveals the critical role of trust, both among stakeholders and between audiences and interventions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-06T21:56:16Z)
• AMMeBa: A Large-Scale Survey and Dataset of Media-Based Misinformation In-The-Wild [1.4193873432298625]
  We show the results of a two-year study using human raters to annotate online media-based misinformation. We show the rise of generative AI-based content in misinformation claims. We also show "simple" methods dominated historically, particularly context manipulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-19T23:05:53Z)
• Agent AI: Surveying the Horizons of Multimodal Interaction [83.18367129924997]
  "Agent AI" is a class of interactive systems that can perceive visual stimuli, language inputs, and other environmentally-grounded data. We envision a future where people can easily create any virtual reality or simulated scene and interact with agents embodied within the virtual environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-07T19:11:18Z)
• A Representative Study on Human Detection of Artificially Generated Media Across Countries [28.99277150719848]
  State-of-the-art forgeries are almost indistinguishable from "real" media. The majority of participants simply guessing when asked to rate them as human- or machine-generated. In addition, AI-generated media receive is voted more human like across all media types and all countries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-10T19:34:52Z)
• Understanding Divergent Framing of the Supreme Court Controversies: Social Media vs. News Outlets [56.67097829383139]
  We focus on the nuanced distinctions in framing of social media and traditional media outlets concerning a series of U.S. Supreme Court rulings. We observe significant polarization in the news media's treatment of affirmative action and abortion rights, whereas the topic of student loans tends to exhibit a greater degree of consensus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-18T06:40:21Z)
• IMAGINE: An Integrated Model of Artificial Intelligence-Mediated Communication Effects [0.0]
  I propose the definition of the Integrated Model of Artificial Intelligence-Mediated Communication Effects (IMAGINE) The conceptual framework proposed is aimed to help scholars theorizing and doing research in a scenario of continuous real-time connection between AI measurement of people's responses to media, and the AI creation of content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-13T19:48:38Z)
• Fighting Malicious Media Data: A Survey on Tampering Detection and Deepfake Detection [115.83992775004043]
  Recent advances in deep learning, particularly deep generative models, open the doors for producing perceptually convincing images and videos at a low cost. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the current media tampering detection approaches, and discusses the challenges and trends in this field for future research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-12T02:54:08Z)
• Inference of Media Bias and Content Quality Using Natural-Language Processing [6.092956184948962]
  We present a framework to infer both political bias and content quality of media outlets from text. We apply a bidirectional long short-term memory (LSTM) neural network to a data set of more than 1 million tweets. Our results illustrate the importance of leveraging word order into machine-learning methods in text analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-01T03:04:55Z)
• GREENER: Graph Neural Networks for News Media Profiling [24.675574340841163]
  We study the problem of profiling news media on the Web with respect to their factuality of reporting and bias. Our main focus is on modeling the similarity between media outlets based on the overlap of their audience. Prediction accuracy is found to improve by 2.5-27 macro-F1 points for the two tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-10T12:46:29Z)
• Aggression and "hate speech" in communication of media users: analysis of control capabilities [50.591267188664666]
  Authors studied the possibilities of mutual influence of users in new media. They found a high level of aggression and hate speech when discussing an urgent social problem - measures for COVID-19 fighting. Results can be useful for developing media content in a modern digital environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-25T15:53:32Z)
• MuMuQA: Multimedia Multi-Hop News Question Answering via Cross-Media Knowledge Extraction and Grounding [131.8797942031366]
  We present a new QA evaluation benchmark with 1,384 questions over news articles that require cross-media grounding of objects in images onto text. Specifically, the task involves multi-hop questions that require reasoning over image-caption pairs to identify the grounded visual object being referred to and then predicting a span from the news body text to answer the question. We introduce a novel multimedia data augmentation framework, based on cross-media knowledge extraction and synthetic question-answer generation, to automatically augment data that can provide weak supervision for this task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-20T18:23:30Z)
• Cross-Media Keyphrase Prediction: A Unified Framework with Multi-Modality Multi-Head Attention and Image Wordings [63.79979145520512]
  We explore the joint effects of texts and images in predicting the keyphrases for a multimedia post. We propose a novel Multi-Modality Multi-Head Attention (M3H-Att) to capture the intricate cross-media interactions. Our model significantly outperforms the previous state of the art based on traditional attention networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-03T08:44:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.