"A Good Bot Always Knows Its Limitations": Assessing Autonomous System Decision-making Competencies through Factorized Machine Self-confidence
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.19631v2
- Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2024 17:10:43 GMT
- Title: "A Good Bot Always Knows Its Limitations": Assessing Autonomous System Decision-making Competencies through Factorized Machine Self-confidence
- Authors: Brett Israelsen, Nisar R. Ahmed, Matthew Aitken, Eric W. Frew, Dale A. Lawrence, Brian M. Argrow,
- Abstract summary: Factorized Machine Self-confidence (FaMSeC) provides a holistic description of factors driving an algorithmic decision-making process.
indicators are derived from hierarchical problem-solving statistics' embedded within broad classes of probabilistic decision-making algorithms.
FaMSeC allows algorithmic goodness of fit' evaluations to be easily incorporated into the design of many kinds of autonomous agents.
- Score: 5.167803438665586
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: How can intelligent machines assess their competencies in completing tasks? This question has come into focus for autonomous systems that algorithmically reason and make decisions under uncertainty. It is argued here that machine self-confidence - a form of meta-reasoning based on self-assessments of an agent's knowledge about the state of the world and itself, as well as its ability to reason about and execute tasks - leads to many eminently computable and useful competency indicators for such agents. This paper presents a culmination of work on this concept in the form of a computational framework called Factorized Machine Self-confidence (FaMSeC), which provides a holistic engineering-focused description of factors driving an algorithmic decision-making process, including: outcome assessment, solver quality, model quality, alignment quality, and past experience. In FaMSeC, self confidence indicators are derived from hierarchical `problem-solving statistics' embedded within broad classes of probabilistic decision-making algorithms such as Markov decision processes. The problem-solving statistics are obtained by evaluating and grading probabilistic exceedance margins with respect to given competency standards, which are specified for each of the various decision-making competency factors by the informee (e.g. a non-expert user or an expert system designer). This approach allows `algorithmic goodness of fit' evaluations to be easily incorporated into the design of many kinds of autonomous agents in the form of human-interpretable competency self-assessment reports. Detailed descriptions and application examples for a Markov decision process agent show how two of the FaMSeC factors (outcome assessment and solver quality) can be computed and reported for a range of possible tasking contexts through novel use of meta-utility functions, behavior simulations, and surrogate prediction models.
Related papers
- Rational Decision-Making Agent with Internalized Utility Judgment [91.80700126895927]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable advancements and have attracted significant efforts to develop LLMs into agents capable of executing intricate multi-step decision-making tasks beyond traditional NLP applications.
This paper proposes RadAgent, which fosters the development of its rationality through an iterative framework involving Experience Exploration and Utility Learning.
Experimental results on the ToolBench dataset demonstrate RadAgent's superiority over baselines, achieving over 10% improvement in Pass Rate on diverse tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-24T03:11:45Z) - Evaluating Explainability in Machine Learning Predictions through Explainer-Agnostic Metrics [0.0]
We develop six distinct model-agnostic metrics designed to quantify the extent to which model predictions can be explained.
These metrics measure different aspects of model explainability, ranging from local importance, global importance, and surrogate predictions.
We demonstrate the practical utility of these metrics on classification and regression tasks, and integrate these metrics into an existing Python package for public use.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-23T15:28:36Z) - The Meta-Evaluation Problem in Explainable AI: Identifying Reliable
Estimators with MetaQuantus [10.135749005469686]
One of the unsolved challenges in the field of Explainable AI (XAI) is determining how to most reliably estimate the quality of an explanation method.
We address this issue through a meta-evaluation of different quality estimators in XAI.
Our novel framework, MetaQuantus, analyses two complementary performance characteristics of a quality estimator.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-14T18:59:02Z) - On solving decision and risk management problems subject to uncertainty [91.3755431537592]
Uncertainty is a pervasive challenge in decision and risk management.
This paper develops a systematic understanding of such strategies, determine their range of application, and develop a framework to better employ them.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-18T19:16:23Z) - Uncertainty-Driven Action Quality Assessment [67.20617610820857]
We propose a novel probabilistic model, named Uncertainty-Driven AQA (UD-AQA), to capture the diversity among multiple judge scores.
We generate the estimation of uncertainty for each prediction, which is employed to re-weight AQA regression loss.
Our proposed method achieves competitive results on three benchmarks including the Olympic events MTL-AQA and FineDiving, and the surgical skill JIGSAWS datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-29T07:21:15Z) - A Factor-Based Framework for Decision-Making Competency Self-Assessment [1.3670071336891754]
We develop a framework for generating succinct human-understandable competency self-assessments in terms of machine self confidence.
We combine several aspects of probabilistic meta reasoning for algorithmic planning and decision-making under uncertainty to arrive at a novel set of generalizable self-confidence factors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-22T18:19:10Z) - Multi Agent System for Machine Learning Under Uncertainty in Cyber
Physical Manufacturing System [78.60415450507706]
Recent advancements in predictive machine learning has led to its application in various use cases in manufacturing.
Most research focused on maximising predictive accuracy without addressing the uncertainty associated with it.
In this paper, we determine the sources of uncertainty in machine learning and establish the success criteria of a machine learning system to function well under uncertainty.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-28T10:28:05Z) - Ensemble Quantile Networks: Uncertainty-Aware Reinforcement Learning
with Applications in Autonomous Driving [1.6758573326215689]
Reinforcement learning can be used to create a decision-making agent for autonomous driving.
Previous approaches provide only black-box solutions, which do not offer information on how confident the agent is about its decisions.
This paper introduces the Ensemble Quantile Networks (EQN) method, which combines distributional RL with an ensemble approach to obtain a complete uncertainty estimate.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-21T10:36:16Z) - Leveraging Expert Consistency to Improve Algorithmic Decision Support [62.61153549123407]
We explore the use of historical expert decisions as a rich source of information that can be combined with observed outcomes to narrow the construct gap.
We propose an influence function-based methodology to estimate expert consistency indirectly when each case in the data is assessed by a single expert.
Our empirical evaluation, using simulations in a clinical setting and real-world data from the child welfare domain, indicates that the proposed approach successfully narrows the construct gap.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-24T05:40:29Z) - Uncertainty as a Form of Transparency: Measuring, Communicating, and
Using Uncertainty [66.17147341354577]
We argue for considering a complementary form of transparency by estimating and communicating the uncertainty associated with model predictions.
We describe how uncertainty can be used to mitigate model unfairness, augment decision-making, and build trustworthy systems.
This work constitutes an interdisciplinary review drawn from literature spanning machine learning, visualization/HCI, design, decision-making, and fairness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-15T17:26:14Z) - Dirichlet uncertainty wrappers for actionable algorithm accuracy
accountability and auditability [0.5156484100374058]
We propose a wrapper that enriches its output prediction with a measure of uncertainty.
Based on the resulting uncertainty measure, we advocate for a rejection system that selects the more confident predictions.
Results demonstrate the effectiveness of the uncertainty computed by the wrapper.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2019-12-29T11:05:47Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.