Decide: Knowledge-Based Version Incompatibility Detection in Deep Learning Stacks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.02133v1
• Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2024 20:05:22 GMT
• Title: Decide: Knowledge-Based Version Incompatibility Detection in Deep Learning Stacks
• Authors: Zihan Zhou, Zhongkai Zhao, Bonan Kou, Tianyi Zhang,
• Abstract summary: Version incompatibility issues are prevalent when reusing or reproducing deep learning (DL) models and applications. We present Decide, a web-based visualization of a knowledge graph that contains 2,376 version knowledge extracted from Stack Overflow discussions.
• Score: 9.122391333975806
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Version incompatibility issues are prevalent when reusing or reproducing deep learning (DL) models and applications. Compared with official API documentation, which is often incomplete or out-of-date, Stack Overflow (SO) discussions possess a wealth of version knowledge that has not been explored by previous approaches. To bridge this gap, we present Decide, a web-based visualization of a knowledge graph that contains 2,376 version knowledge extracted from SO discussions. As an interactive tool, Decide allows users to easily check whether two libraries are compatible and explore compatibility knowledge of certain DL stack components with or without the version specified. A video demonstrating the usage of Decide is available at https://youtu.be/wqPxF2ZaZo0.

Related papers

• Robust and Scalable Model Editing for Large Language Models [75.95623066605259]
  We propose EREN (Edit models by REading Notes) to improve the scalability and robustness of LLM editing. Unlike existing techniques, it can integrate knowledge from multiple edits, and correctly respond to syntactically similar but semantically unrelated inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-26T06:57:23Z)
• A Knowledge Plug-and-Play Test Bed for Open-domain Dialogue Generation [51.31429493814664]
  We present a benchmark named multi-source Wizard of Wikipedia for evaluating multi-source dialogue knowledge selection and response generation. We propose a new challenge, dialogue knowledge plug-and-play, which aims to test an already trained dialogue model on using new support knowledge from previously unseen sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-06T06:54:02Z)
• Merging Generated and Retrieved Knowledge for Open-Domain QA [72.42262579925911]
  COMBO is a compatibility-Oriented knowledge Merging for Better Open-domain QA framework. We show that COMBO outperforms competitive baselines on three out of four tested open-domain QA benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-22T19:37:06Z)
• Knowledge-Based Version Incompatibility Detection for Deep Learning [32.116361254082086]
  We propose to leverage the abundant discussions of DL version issues from Stack Overflow to facilitate version incompatibility detection. We reformulate the problem of knowledge extraction as a Question-Answering (QA) problem and use a pre-trained QA model to extract version compatibility knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-25T09:53:26Z)
• The KITMUS Test: Evaluating Knowledge Integration from Multiple Sources in Natural Language Understanding Systems [87.3207729953778]
  We evaluate state-of-the-art coreference resolution models on our dataset. Several models struggle to reason on-the-fly over knowledge observed both at pretrain time and at inference time. Still, even the best performing models seem to have difficulties with reliably integrating knowledge presented only at inference time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-15T23:26:54Z)
• An Empirical Study of Library Usage and Dependency in Deep Learning Frameworks [12.624032509149869]
  pytorch, Caffe, and Scikit-learn are the most frequent combination in 18% and 14% of the projects. The developer uses two or three dl libraries in the same projects and tends to use different multiple dl libraries in both the same function and the same files.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-28T19:31:56Z)
• Knowledge-Routed Visual Question Reasoning: Challenges for Deep Representation Embedding [140.5911760063681]
  We propose a novel dataset named Knowledge-Routed Visual Question Reasoning for VQA model evaluation. We generate the question-answer pair based on both the Visual Genome scene graph and an external knowledge base with controlled programs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-14T00:33:44Z)
• Towards Backward-Compatible Representation Learning [86.39292571306395]
  We propose a way to learn visual features that are compatible with previously computed ones even when they have different dimensions. This enables visual search systems to bypass computing new features for all previously seen images when updating the embedding models. We propose a framework to train embedding models, called backward-compatible training (BCT), as a first step towards backward compatible representation learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-26T14:34:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.