Judgment2vec: Apply Graph Analytics to Searching and Recommendation of Similar Judgments

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.04382v1
• Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 11:37:32 GMT
• Title: Judgment2vec: Apply Graph Analytics to Searching and Recommendation of Similar Judgments
• Authors: Hsuan-Lei Shao,
• Abstract summary: In court practice, legal professionals rely on their training to provide opinions that resolve cases. Finding a similar case is challenging and often depends on experience, legal domain knowledge, and extensive labor hours. This research aims to automate the analysis of judgment text similarity.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: In court practice, legal professionals rely on their training to provide opinions that resolve cases, one of the most crucial aspects being the ability to identify similar judgments from previous courts efficiently. However, finding a similar case is challenging and often depends on experience, legal domain knowledge, and extensive labor hours, making veteran lawyers or judges indispensable. This research aims to automate the analysis of judgment text similarity. We utilized a judgment dataset labeled as the "golden standard" by experts, which includes human-verified features that can be converted into an "expert similarity score." We then constructed a knowledge graph based on "case-article" relationships, ranking each case using natural language processing to derive a "Node2vec similarity score." By evaluating these two similarity scores, we identified their discrepancies and relationships. The results can significantly reduce the labor hours required for legal searches and recommendations, with potential applications extending to various fields of information retrieval.

Related papers

• JudgeRank: Leveraging Large Language Models for Reasoning-Intensive Reranking [81.88787401178378]
  We introduce JudgeRank, a novel agentic reranker that emulates human cognitive processes when assessing document relevance. We evaluate JudgeRank on the reasoning-intensive BRIGHT benchmark, demonstrating substantial performance improvements over first-stage retrieval methods. In addition, JudgeRank performs on par with fine-tuned state-of-the-art rerankers on the popular BEIR benchmark, validating its zero-shot generalization capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T18:43:12Z)
• Beyond Relevance: Evaluate and Improve Retrievers on Perspective Awareness [56.42192735214931]
  retrievers are expected to not only rely on the semantic relevance between the documents and the queries but also recognize the nuanced intents or perspectives behind a user query. In this work, we study whether retrievers can recognize and respond to different perspectives of the queries. We show that current retrievers have limited awareness of subtly different perspectives in queries and can also be biased toward certain perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-04T17:10:00Z)
• Leveraging Large Language Models for Relevance Judgments in Legal Case Retrieval [18.058942674792604]
  We propose a novel few-shot workflow tailored to the relevant judgment of legal cases. By comparing the relevance judgments of LLMs and human experts, we empirically show that we can obtain reliable relevance judgments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-27T09:46:56Z)
• LLM vs. Lawyers: Identifying a Subset of Summary Judgments in a Large UK Case Law Dataset [0.0]
  This study addresses the gap in the literature working with large legal corpora about how to isolate cases, in our case summary judgments, from a large corpus of UK court decisions. We use the Cambridge Law Corpus of 356,011 UK court decisions and determine that the large language model achieves a weighted F1 score of 0.94 versus 0.78 for keywords. We identify and extract 3,102 summary judgment cases, enabling us to map their distribution across various UK courts over a temporal span.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-04T10:13:30Z)
• MUSER: A Multi-View Similar Case Retrieval Dataset [65.36779942237357]
  Similar case retrieval (SCR) is a representative legal AI application that plays a pivotal role in promoting judicial fairness. Existing SCR datasets only focus on the fact description section when judging the similarity between cases. We present M, a similar case retrieval dataset based on multi-view similarity measurement and comprehensive legal element with sentence-level legal element annotations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T08:17:11Z)
• Analysing the Resourcefulness of the Paragraph for Precedence Retrieval [0.1761604268733064]
  We analyzed the resourcefulness of paragraph-level information in capturing similarity among judgments for improving the performance of precedence retrieval. We found that the paragraph-level methods could capture the similarity among the judgments with only a few paragraph interactions and exhibit more discriminating power over the baseline document-level method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-29T08:55:38Z)
• An Intent Taxonomy of Legal Case Retrieval [43.22489520922202]
  Legal case retrieval is a special Information Retrieval(IR) task focusing on legal case documents. We present a novel hierarchical intent taxonomy of legal case retrieval. We reveal significant differences in user behavior and satisfaction under different search intents in legal case retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-25T07:27:32Z)
• SAILER: Structure-aware Pre-trained Language Model for Legal Case Retrieval [75.05173891207214]
  Legal case retrieval plays a core role in the intelligent legal system. Most existing language models have difficulty understanding the long-distance dependencies between different structures. We propose a new Structure-Aware pre-traIned language model for LEgal case Retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-22T10:47:01Z)
• Perspectives on Large Language Models for Relevance Judgment [56.935731584323996]
  Large language models (LLMs) claim that they can assist with relevance judgments. It is not clear whether automated judgments can reliably be used in evaluations of retrieval systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-13T13:08:38Z)
• Similar Cases Recommendation using Legal Knowledge Graphs [3.3498759480099856]
  A legal knowledge graph constructed from court cases, judgments, laws and other legal documents can enable a number of applications like question answering, document similarity, and search. In this work, we describe our solution for predicting similar cases in Indian court judgements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-10T06:37:36Z)
• Equality before the Law: Legal Judgment Consistency Analysis for Fairness [55.91612739713396]
  In this paper, we propose an evaluation metric for judgment inconsistency, Legal Inconsistency Coefficient (LInCo) We simulate judges from different groups with legal judgment prediction (LJP) models and measure the judicial inconsistency with the disagreement of the judgment results given by LJP models trained on different groups. We employ LInCo to explore the inconsistency in real cases and come to the following observations: (1) Both regional and gender inconsistency exist in the legal system, but gender inconsistency is much less than regional inconsistency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-25T14:28:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.