The Struggles of LLMs in Cross-lingual Code Clone Detection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.04430v3
• Date: Tue, 06 May 2025 12:19:55 GMT
• Title: The Struggles of LLMs in Cross-lingual Code Clone Detection
• Authors: Micheline Bénédicte Moumoula, Abdoul Kader Kabore, Jacques Klein, Tegawendé Bissyande,
• Abstract summary: Cross-lingual code clone detection has gained traction within the software engineering community.<n>Inspired by the significant advances in machine learning, this paper revisits cross-lingual code clone detection.<n>We evaluate the performance of five (05) Large Language Models (LLMs) and eight prompts (08) for the identification of cross-lingual code clones.
• Score: 3.5202378300682162
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: With the involvement of multiple programming languages in modern software development, cross-lingual code clone detection has gained traction within the software engineering community. Numerous studies have explored this topic, proposing various promising approaches. Inspired by the significant advances in machine learning in recent years, particularly Large Language Models (LLMs), which have demonstrated their ability to tackle various tasks, this paper revisits cross-lingual code clone detection. We evaluate the performance of five (05) LLMs and eight prompts (08) for the identification of cross-lingual code clones. Additionally, we compare these results against two baseline methods. Finally, we evaluate a pre-trained embedding model to assess the effectiveness of the generated representations for classifying clone and non-clone pairs. The studies involving LLMs and Embedding models are evaluated using two widely used cross-lingual datasets, XLCoST and CodeNet. Our results show that LLMs can achieve high F1 scores, up to 0.99, for straightforward programming examples. However, they not only perform less well on programs associated with complex programming challenges but also do not necessarily understand the meaning of "code clones" in a cross-lingual setting. We show that embedding models used to represent code fragments from different programming languages in the same representation space enable the training of a basic classifier that outperforms all LLMs by ~1 and ~20 percentage points on the XLCoST and CodeNet datasets, respectively. This finding suggests that, despite the apparent capabilities of LLMs, embeddings provided by embedding models offer suitable representations to achieve state-of-the-art performance in cross-lingual code clone detection.

Related papers

• HyClone: Bridging LLM Understanding and Dynamic Execution for Semantic Code Clone Detection [3.2167919219391474]
  Code clone detection is a critical task in software engineering, aimed at identifying duplicated or similar code fragments within or across software systems.<n>Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in understanding code semantics.<n>We propose a novel two-stage framework that combines LLM-based screening with execution-based validation for detecting semantic clones in Python programs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-02T13:11:56Z)
• IFEvalCode: Controlled Code Generation [69.28317223249358]
  The paper introduces forward and backward constraints generation to improve the instruction-following capabilities of Code LLMs.<n>The authors present IFEvalCode, a multilingual benchmark comprising 1.6K test samples across seven programming languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-30T08:08:48Z)
• CrossPL: Evaluating Large Language Models on Cross Programming Language Code Generation [24.468767564264738]
  We present CrossPL, the first benchmark designed to evaluate large language models' (LLMs) ability to generate cross-programming-language (CPL) code.<n>CrossPL comprises 1,982 tasks centered around IPC, covering six widely-used programming languages and seven representative CPL techniques.<n>We evaluate 14 state-of-the-art general-purpose LLMs and 6 code-oriented LLMs released in the past three years on CrossPL via FSM-based validation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-26T10:28:39Z)
• Cross-Lingual Pitfalls: Automatic Probing Cross-Lingual Weakness of Multilingual Large Language Models [55.14276067678253]
  This paper introduces a novel methodology for efficiently identifying inherent cross-lingual weaknesses in Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We construct a new dataset of over 6,000 bilingual pairs across 16 languages using this methodology, demonstrating its effectiveness in revealing weaknesses even in state-of-the-art models.<n>Further experiments investigate the relationship between linguistic similarity and cross-lingual weaknesses, revealing that linguistically related languages share similar performance patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-24T12:31:27Z)
• CoDet-M4: Detecting Machine-Generated Code in Multi-Lingual, Multi-Generator and Multi-Domain Settings [32.72039589832989]
  Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized code generation, automating programming with remarkable efficiency.<n>These advancements challenge programming skills, ethics, and assessment integrity, making the detection of LLM-generated code essential for maintaining accountability and standards.<n>We propose a framework capable of distinguishing between human- and LLM-written code across multiple programming languages, code generators, and domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-17T21:41:37Z)
• Crystal: Illuminating LLM Abilities on Language and Code [58.5467653736537]
  We propose a pretraining strategy to enhance the integration of natural language and coding capabilities. The resulting model, Crystal, demonstrates remarkable capabilities in both domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-06T10:28:46Z)
• Multi-Programming Language Ensemble for Code Generation in Large Language Model [5.882816711878273]
  Large language models (LLMs) have significantly improved code generation, particularly in one-pass code generation. Most existing approaches focus solely on generating code in a single programming language, overlooking the potential of leveraging the multi-language capabilities of LLMs. We propose Multi-Programming Language Ensemble (MPLE), a novel ensemble-based method that utilizes code generation across multiple programming languages to enhance overall performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-06T08:31:18Z)
• Exploring the Impact of the Output Format on the Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Translation [8.81447711370817]
  We empirically analyze the generated outputs of eleven popular instruct-tuned large language models (LLMs) Our results demonstrate that a strategic combination of prompt engineering and regular expression can effectively extract the source code from the model generation output.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-25T21:41:31Z)
• Embracing Language Inclusivity and Diversity in CLIP through Continual Language Learning [58.92843729869586]
  Vision-language pre-trained models (VL-PTMs) have advanced multimodal research in recent years, but their mastery in a few languages like English restricts their applicability in broader communities. We propose to extend VL-PTMs' language capacity by continual language learning (CLL), where a model needs to update its linguistic knowledge incrementally without suffering from catastrophic forgetting (CF) We construct a CLL benchmark covering 36 languages based on MSCOCO and XM3600 datasets and then evaluate multilingual image-text retrieval performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-30T17:14:05Z)
• AdaCCD: Adaptive Semantic Contrasts Discovery Based Cross Lingual Adaptation for Code Clone Detection [69.79627042058048]
  AdaCCD is a novel cross-lingual adaptation method that can detect cloned codes in a new language without annotations in that language. We evaluate the cross-lingual adaptation results of AdaCCD by constructing a multilingual code clone detection benchmark consisting of 5 programming languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T12:20:48Z)
• L2CEval: Evaluating Language-to-Code Generation Capabilities of Large Language Models [102.00201523306986]
  We present L2CEval, a systematic evaluation of the language-to-code generation capabilities of large language models (LLMs) We analyze the factors that potentially affect their performance, such as model size, pretraining data, instruction tuning, and different prompting methods. In addition to assessing model performance, we measure confidence calibration for the models and conduct human evaluations of the output programs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-29T17:57:00Z)
• ZC3: Zero-Shot Cross-Language Code Clone Detection [79.53514630357876]
  We propose a novel method named ZC3 for Zero-shot Cross-language Code Clone detection. ZC3 designs the contrastive snippet prediction to form an isomorphic representation space among different programming languages. Based on this, ZC3 exploits domain-aware learning and cycle consistency learning to generate representations that are aligned among different languages are diacritical for different types of clones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-26T03:48:10Z)
• XSemPLR: Cross-Lingual Semantic Parsing in Multiple Natural Languages and Meaning Representations [25.50509874992198]
  Cross-Lingual Semantic Parsing aims to translate queries in multiple natural languages into meaning representations. Existing CLSP models are separately proposed and evaluated on datasets of limited tasks and applications. We present XSemPLR, a unified benchmark for cross-lingual semantic parsing featured with 22 natural languages and 8 meaning representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-07T01:09:37Z)
• CCT-Code: Cross-Consistency Training for Multilingual Clone Detection and Code Search [4.192584020959536]
  We formulate the multilingual clone detection problem and present XCD, a new benchmark dataset produced from the CodeForces submissions dataset. We present a novel training procedure, called cross-consistency training (CCT), that we apply to train language models on source code in different programming languages. The resulting CCT-LM model achieves new state of the art, outperforming existing approaches on the POJ-104 clone detection benchmark with 95.67% MAP and AdvTest code search benchmark with 47.18% MRR.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-19T12:09:49Z)
• LEVER: Learning to Verify Language-to-Code Generation with Execution [64.36459105535]
  We propose LEVER, a simple approach to improve language-to-code generation by learning to verify the generated programs with their execution results. Specifically, we train verifiers to determine whether a program sampled from the LLMs is correct or not based on the natural language input, the program itself and its execution results. LEVER consistently improves over the base code LLMs(4.6% to 10.9% with code-davinci) and achieves new state-of-the-art results on all of them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-16T18:23:22Z)
• Multi-lingual Evaluation of Code Generation Models [82.7357812992118]
  We present new benchmarks on evaluation code generation models: MBXP and Multilingual HumanEval, and MathQA-X. These datasets cover over 10 programming languages. We are able to assess the performance of code generation models in a multi-lingual fashion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-26T17:17:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.