More Skin, More Likes! Measuring Child Exposure and User Engagement on TikTok

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.05622v2
• Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 15:12:55 GMT
• Title: More Skin, More Likes! Measuring Child Exposure and User Engagement on TikTok
• Authors: Miriam Schirmer, Angelina Voggenreiter, Jürgen Pfeffer,
• Abstract summary: Study investigates children's exposure on TikTok. Analyzing 432,178 comments across 5,896 videos from 115 user accounts featuring children.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Sharenting, the practice of parents sharing content about their children on social media platforms, has become increasingly common, raising concerns about children's privacy and safety online. This study investigates children's exposure on TikTok, offering a detailed examination of the platform's content and associated comments. Analyzing 432,178 comments across 5,896 videos from 115 user accounts featuring children, we categorize content into Family, Fashion, and Sports. Our analysis highlights potential risks, such as inappropriate comments or contact offers, with a focus on appearance-based comments. Notably, 21% of comments relate to visual appearance. Additionally, 19.57% of videos depict children in revealing clothing, such as swimwear or bare midriffs, attracting significantly more appearance-based comments and likes than videos featuring fully clothed children, although this trend does not extend to downloads. These findings underscore the need for heightened awareness and protective measures to safeguard children's privacy and well-being in the digital age.

Related papers

• HOTVCOM: Generating Buzzworthy Comments for Videos [49.39846630199698]
  This study introduces textscHotVCom, the largest Chinese video hot-comment dataset, comprising 94k diverse videos and 137 million comments. We also present the textttComHeat framework, which synergistically integrates visual, auditory, and textual data to generate influential hot-comments on the Chinese video dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-23T16:45:13Z)
• Security Advice for Parents and Children About Content Filtering and Circumvention as Found on YouTube and TikTok [2.743215038883957]
  We examine the advice available to parents and children regarding content filtering and circumvention as found on YouTube and TikTok. Our results show that of these videos, roughly three-quarters are accurate, with the remaining one-fourth containing factually incorrect advice. We find that videos targeting children are both more likely to be incorrect and actionable than videos targeting parents, leaving children at increased risk of taking harmful action.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-05T18:12:33Z)
• ViCo: Engaging Video Comment Generation with Human Preference Rewards [68.50351391812723]
  We propose ViCo with three novel designs to tackle the challenges for generating engaging Video Comments. To quantify the engagement of comments, we utilize the number of "likes" each comment receives as a proxy of human preference. To automatically evaluate the engagement of comments, we train a reward model to align its judgment to the above proxy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-22T04:01:01Z)
• An Image is Worth a Thousand Toxic Words: A Metamorphic Testing Framework for Content Moderation Software [64.367830425115]
  Social media platforms are being increasingly misused to spread toxic content, including hate speech, malicious advertising, and pornography. Despite tremendous efforts in developing and deploying content moderation methods, malicious users can evade moderation by embedding texts into images. We propose a metamorphic testing framework for content moderation software.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-18T20:33:06Z)
• Malicious or Benign? Towards Effective Content Moderation for Children's Videos [1.0323063834827415]
  This paper introduces our toolkit Malicious or Benign for promoting research on automated content moderation of children's videos. We present 1) a customizable annotation tool for videos, 2) a new dataset with difficult to detect test cases of malicious content, and 3) a benchmark suite of state-of-the-art video classification models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T20:33:38Z)
• Analyzing Norm Violations in Live-Stream Chat [49.120561596550395]
  We study the first NLP study dedicated to detecting norm violations in conversations on live-streaming platforms. We define norm violation categories in live-stream chats and annotate 4,583 moderated comments from Twitch. Our results show that appropriate contextual information can boost moderation performance by 35%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-18T05:58:27Z)
• Did your child get disturbed by an inappropriate advertisement on YouTube? [3.2113789596629503]
  We analyze the advertising patterns of 24.6 K diverse YouTube videos appropriate for young children. We find that 9.9% of the 4.6 K unique advertisements shown on these 24.6 K videos contain inappropriate content for young children.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-04T10:28:54Z)
• How Would The Viewer Feel? Estimating Wellbeing From Video Scenarios [73.24092762346095]
  We introduce two large-scale datasets with over 60,000 videos annotated for emotional response and subjective wellbeing. The Video Cognitive Empathy dataset contains annotations for distributions of fine-grained emotional responses, allowing models to gain a detailed understanding of affective states. The Video to Valence dataset contains annotations of relative pleasantness between videos, which enables predicting a continuous spectrum of wellbeing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-18T17:58:25Z)
• YouTubers Not madeForKids: Detecting Channels Sharing Inappropriate Videos Targeting Children [3.936965297430477]
  We study YouTube channels found to post suitable or disturbing videos targeting kids in the past. We identify a clear discrepancy between what YouTube assumes and flags as inappropriate content and channel, vs. what is found to be disturbing content and still available on the platform.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-27T10:34:15Z)
• Hate, Obscenity, and Insults: Measuring the Exposure of Children to Inappropriate Comments in YouTube [8.688428251722911]
  In this paper, we investigate the exposure of young users to inappropriate comments posted on YouTube videos targeting this demographic. We collected a large-scale dataset of approximately four million records and studied the presence of five age-inappropriate categories and the amount of exposure to each category. Using natural language processing and machine learning techniques, we constructed ensemble classifiers that achieved high accuracy in detecting inappropriate comments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-03T20:15:22Z)
• Mi YouTube es Su YouTube? Analyzing the Cultures using YouTube Thumbnails of Popular Videos [98.87558262467257]
  This study explores culture preferences among countries using the thumbnails of YouTube trending videos. Experimental results indicate that the users from similar cultures shares interests in watching similar videos on YouTube.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-27T20:15:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.