DATTA: Towards Diversity Adaptive Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild World

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.08056v1
• Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 09:50:11 GMT
• Title: DATTA: Towards Diversity Adaptive Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild World
• Authors: Chuyang Ye, Dongyan Wei, Zhendong Liu, Yuanyi Pang, Yixi Lin, Jiarong Liao, Qinting Jiang, Xianghua Fu, Qing Li, Jingyan Jiang,
• Abstract summary: This paper proposes a new general method, named Diversity Adaptive Test-Time Adaptation (DATTA), aimed at improving Quality of Experience (QoE) It features three key components: Diversity Discrimination (DD) to assess batch diversity, Diversity Adaptive Batch Normalization (DABN) to tailor normalization methods based on DD insights, and Diversity Adaptive Fine-Tuning (DAFT) to selectively fine-tune the model. Experimental results show that our method achieves up to a 21% increase in accuracy compared to state-of-the-art methodologies.
• Score: 6.816521410643928
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Test-time adaptation (TTA) effectively addresses distribution shifts between training and testing data by adjusting models on test samples, which is crucial for improving model inference in real-world applications. However, traditional TTA methods typically follow a fixed pattern to address the dynamic data patterns (low-diversity or high-diversity patterns) often leading to performance degradation and consequently a decline in Quality of Experience (QoE). The primary issues we observed are:Different scenarios require different normalization methods (e.g., Instance Normalization is optimal in mixed domains but not in static domains). Model fine-tuning can potentially harm the model and waste time.Hence, it is crucial to design strategies for effectively measuring and managing distribution diversity to minimize its negative impact on model performance. Based on these observations, this paper proposes a new general method, named Diversity Adaptive Test-Time Adaptation (DATTA), aimed at improving QoE. DATTA dynamically selects the best batch normalization methods and fine-tuning strategies by leveraging the Diversity Score to differentiate between high and low diversity score batches. It features three key components: Diversity Discrimination (DD) to assess batch diversity, Diversity Adaptive Batch Normalization (DABN) to tailor normalization methods based on DD insights, and Diversity Adaptive Fine-Tuning (DAFT) to selectively fine-tune the model. Experimental results show that our method achieves up to a 21% increase in accuracy compared to state-of-the-art methodologies, indicating that our method maintains good model performance while demonstrating its robustness. Our code will be released soon.

Related papers

• MITA: Bridging the Gap between Model and Data for Test-time Adaptation [68.62509948690698]
  Test-Time Adaptation (TTA) has emerged as a promising paradigm for enhancing the generalizability of models. We propose Meet-In-The-Middle based MITA, which introduces energy-based optimization to encourage mutual adaptation of the model and data from opposing directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-12T07:02:33Z)
• Uncertainty Aware Learning for Language Model Alignment [97.36361196793929]
  We propose uncertainty-aware learning (UAL) to improve the model alignment of different task scenarios. We implement UAL in a simple fashion -- adaptively setting the label smoothing value of training according to the uncertainty of individual samples. Experiments on widely used benchmarks demonstrate that our UAL significantly and consistently outperforms standard supervised fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-07T11:37:45Z)
• A Conditioned Unsupervised Regression Framework Attuned to the Dynamic Nature of Data Streams [0.0]
  This paper presents an optimal strategy for streaming contexts with limited labeled data, introducing an adaptive technique for unsupervised regression. The proposed method leverages a sparse set of initial labels and introduces an innovative drift detection mechanism. To enhance adaptability, we integrate the ADWIN (ADaptive WINdowing) algorithm with error generalization based on Root Mean Square Error (RMSE)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-12T19:23:54Z)
• AR-TTA: A Simple Method for Real-World Continual Test-Time Adaptation [1.4530711901349282]
  We propose to validate test-time adaptation methods using datasets for autonomous driving, namely CLAD-C and SHIFT. We observe that current test-time adaptation methods struggle to effectively handle varying degrees of domain shift. We enhance the well-established self-training framework by incorporating a small memory buffer to increase model stability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-18T19:34:23Z)
• Consistency Regularization for Generalizable Source-free Domain Adaptation [62.654883736925456]
  Source-free domain adaptation (SFDA) aims to adapt a well-trained source model to an unlabelled target domain without accessing the source dataset. Existing SFDA methods ONLY assess their adapted models on the target training set, neglecting the data from unseen but identically distributed testing sets. We propose a consistency regularization framework to develop a more generalizable SFDA method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-03T07:45:53Z)
• On Pitfalls of Test-Time Adaptation [82.8392232222119]
  Test-Time Adaptation (TTA) has emerged as a promising approach for tackling the robustness challenge under distribution shifts. We present TTAB, a test-time adaptation benchmark that encompasses ten state-of-the-art algorithms, a diverse array of distribution shifts, and two evaluation protocols.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T09:35:29Z)
• Universal Test-time Adaptation through Weight Ensembling, Diversity Weighting, and Prior Correction [3.5139431332194198]
  Test-time adaptation (TTA) continues to update the model after deployment, leveraging the current test data. We identify and highlight several challenges a self-training based method has to deal with. To prevent the model from becoming biased, we leverage a dataset and model-agnostic certainty and diversity weighting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T13:16:10Z)
• Delving into Identify-Emphasize Paradigm for Combating Unknown Bias [52.76758938921129]
  We propose an effective bias-conflicting scoring method (ECS) to boost the identification accuracy. We also propose gradient alignment (GA) to balance the contributions of the mined bias-aligned and bias-conflicting samples. Experiments are conducted on multiple datasets in various settings, demonstrating that the proposed solution can mitigate the impact of unknown biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-22T14:50:24Z)
• DELTA: degradation-free fully test-time adaptation [59.74287982885375]
  We find that two unfavorable defects are concealed in the prevalent adaptation methodologies like test-time batch normalization (BN) and self-learning. First, we reveal that the normalization statistics in test-time BN are completely affected by the currently received test samples, resulting in inaccurate estimates. Second, we show that during test-time adaptation, the parameter update is biased towards some dominant classes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-30T15:54:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.