Decoding Memes: A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Models for Template Identification
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.08126v1
- Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 12:52:06 GMT
- Title: Decoding Memes: A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Models for Template Identification
- Authors: Levente Murgás, Marcell Nagy, Kate Barnes, Roland Molontay,
- Abstract summary: "meme template" is a layout or format that is used to create memes.
Despite extensive research on meme virality, the task of automatically identifying meme templates remains a challenge.
This paper presents a comprehensive comparison and evaluation of existing meme template identification methods.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Image-with-text memes combine text with imagery to achieve comedy, but in today's world, they also play a pivotal role in online communication, influencing politics, marketing, and social norms. A "meme template" is a preexisting layout or format that is used to create memes. It typically includes specific visual elements, characters, or scenes with blank spaces or captions that can be customized, allowing users to easily create their versions of popular meme templates by adding personal or contextually relevant content. Despite extensive research on meme virality, the task of automatically identifying meme templates remains a challenge. This paper presents a comprehensive comparison and evaluation of existing meme template identification methods, including both established approaches from the literature and novel techniques. We introduce a rigorous evaluation framework that not only assesses the ability of various methods to correctly identify meme templates but also tests their capacity to reject non-memes without false assignments. Our study involves extensive data collection from sites that provide meme annotations (Imgflip) and various social media platforms (Reddit, X, and Facebook) to ensure a diverse and representative dataset. We compare meme template identification methods, highlighting their strengths and limitations. These include supervised and unsupervised approaches, such as convolutional neural networks, distance-based classification, and density-based clustering. Our analysis helps researchers and practitioners choose suitable methods and points to future research directions in this evolving field.
Related papers
- XMeCap: Meme Caption Generation with Sub-Image Adaptability [53.2509590113364]
Humor, deeply rooted in societal meanings and cultural details, poses a unique challenge for machines.
We introduce the textscXMeCap framework, which adopts supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning.
textscXMeCap achieves an average evaluation score of 75.85 for single-image memes and 66.32 for multi-image memes, outperforming the best baseline by 3.71% and 4.82%, respectively.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-24T10:51:46Z) - Meme-ingful Analysis: Enhanced Understanding of Cyberbullying in Memes
Through Multimodal Explanations [48.82168723932981]
We introduce em MultiBully-Ex, the first benchmark dataset for multimodal explanation from code-mixed cyberbullying memes.
A Contrastive Language-Image Pretraining (CLIP) approach has been proposed for visual and textual explanation of a meme.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-18T11:24:30Z) - Social Meme-ing: Measuring Linguistic Variation in Memes [24.226580919186613]
We construct a computational pipeline to cluster individual instances of memes into templates and semantic variables.
We make available the resulting textscSemanticMemes dataset of 3.8M images clustered by their semantic function.
We use these clusters to analyze linguistic variation in memes, discovering not only that socially meaningful variation in meme usage exists between subreddits, but that patterns of meme innovation and acculturation within these communities align with previous findings on written language.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-15T17:20:20Z) - A Template Is All You Meme [83.05919383106715]
We release a knowledge base of memes and information found on www.knowyourmeme.com, composed of more than 54,000 images.
We hypothesize that meme templates can be used to inject models with the context missing from previous approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-11T19:38:14Z) - MEMEX: Detecting Explanatory Evidence for Memes via Knowledge-Enriched
Contextualization [31.209594252045566]
We propose a novel task, MEMEX, given a meme and a related document, the aim is to mine the context that succinctly explains the background of the meme.
To benchmark MCC, we propose MIME, a multimodal neural framework that uses common sense enriched meme representation and a layered approach to capture the cross-modal semantic dependencies between the meme and the context.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-25T10:19:35Z) - MemeTector: Enforcing deep focus for meme detection [8.794414326545697]
It is important to accurately retrieve image memes from social media to better capture the cultural and social aspects of online phenomena.
We propose a methodology that utilizes the visual part of image memes as instances of the regular image class and the initial image memes.
We employ a trainable attention mechanism on top of a standard ViT architecture to enhance the model's ability to focus on these critical parts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-26T10:50:29Z) - Detecting and Understanding Harmful Memes: A Survey [48.135415967633676]
We offer a comprehensive survey with a focus on harmful memes.
One interesting finding is that many types of harmful memes are not really studied, e.g., such featuring self-harm and extremism.
Another observation is that memes can propagate globally through repackaging in different languages and that they can also be multilingual.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-09T13:43:27Z) - Caption Enriched Samples for Improving Hateful Memes Detection [78.5136090997431]
The hateful meme challenge demonstrates the difficulty of determining whether a meme is hateful or not.
Both unimodal language models and multimodal vision-language models cannot reach the human level of performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-22T10:57:51Z) - Memes in the Wild: Assessing the Generalizability of the Hateful Memes
Challenge Dataset [47.65948529524281]
We collect hateful and non-hateful memes from Pinterest to evaluate out-of-sample performance on models pre-trained on the Facebook dataset.
We find that memes in the wild differ in two key aspects: 1) Captions must be extracted via OCR, and 2) Memes are more diverse than traditional memes', including screenshots of conversations or text on a plain background.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-09T09:04:05Z) - Semantic Search of Memes on Twitter [0.8701566919381222]
This paper proposes and compares several methods for automatically classifying images as memes.
We experimentally evaluate the methods using a large dataset of memes collected from Twitter users in Chile.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-04T18:40:38Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.