Fostering Natural Conversation in Large Language Models with NICO: a Natural Interactive COnversation dataset
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.09330v2
- Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 05:55:30 GMT
- Title: Fostering Natural Conversation in Large Language Models with NICO: a Natural Interactive COnversation dataset
- Authors: Renliang Sun, Mengyuan Liu, Shiping Yang, Rui Wang, Junqing He, Jiaxing Zhang,
- Abstract summary: We introduce NICO, a Natural Interactive COnversation dataset in Chinese.
We first use GPT-4-turbo to generate dialogue drafts and make them cover 20 daily-life topics and 5 types of social interactions.
We define two dialogue-level natural conversation tasks and two sentence-level tasks for identifying and rewriting unnatural sentences.
- Score: 28.076028584051617
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Benefiting from diverse instruction datasets, contemporary Large Language Models (LLMs) perform effectively as AI assistants in collaborating with humans. However, LLMs still struggle to generate natural and colloquial responses in real-world applications such as chatbots and psychological counseling that require more human-like interactions. To address these limitations, we introduce NICO, a Natural Interactive COnversation dataset in Chinese. We first use GPT-4-turbo to generate dialogue drafts and make them cover 20 daily-life topics and 5 types of social interactions. Then, we hire workers to revise these dialogues to ensure that they are free of grammatical errors and unnatural utterances. We define two dialogue-level natural conversation tasks and two sentence-level tasks for identifying and rewriting unnatural sentences. Multiple open-source and closed-source LLMs are tested and analyzed in detail. The experimental results highlight the challenge of the tasks and demonstrate how NICO can help foster the natural dialogue capabilities of LLMs. The dataset will be released.
Related papers
- Interactive Dialogue Agents via Reinforcement Learning on Hindsight Regenerations [58.65755268815283]
Many real dialogues are interactive, meaning an agent's utterances will influence their conversational partner, elicit information, or change their opinion.
We use this fact to rewrite and augment existing suboptimal data, and train via offline reinforcement learning (RL) an agent that outperforms both prompting and learning from unaltered human demonstrations.
Our results in a user study with real humans show that our approach greatly outperforms existing state-of-the-art dialogue agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-07T21:37:51Z) - Self-Directed Turing Test for Large Language Models [56.64615470513102]
The Turing test examines whether AIs can exhibit human-like behaviour in natural language conversations.
Traditional Turing tests adopt a rigid dialogue format where each participant sends only one message each time.
This paper proposes the Self-Directed Turing Test, which extends the original test with a burst dialogue format.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-19T09:57:28Z) - PSYDIAL: Personality-based Synthetic Dialogue Generation using Large Language Models [4.283022729693451]
We present a novel end-to-end personality-based synthetic dialogue data generation pipeline, specifically designed to elicit responses from large language models via prompting.
We introduce PSYDIAL, the first Korean dialogue dataset focused on personality-based dialogues, curated using our proposed pipeline.
Experimental results indicate that while pre-trained models and those fine-tuned with a chit-chat dataset struggle to generate responses reflecting personality, models trained with PSYDIAL show significant improvements.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-01T05:19:34Z) - LLM Agents in Interaction: Measuring Personality Consistency and
Linguistic Alignment in Interacting Populations of Large Language Models [4.706971067968811]
We create a two-group population of large language models (LLMs) agents using a simple variability-inducing sampling algorithm.
We administer personality tests and submit the agents to a collaborative writing task, finding that different profiles exhibit different degrees of personality consistency and linguistic alignment to their conversational partners.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-05T11:05:20Z) - Zero-Shot Goal-Directed Dialogue via RL on Imagined Conversations [70.7884839812069]
Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful and general solutions to many natural language tasks.
However, many of the most important applications of language generation are interactive, where an agent has to talk to a person to reach a desired outcome.
In this work, we explore a new method for adapting LLMs with RL for such goal-directed dialogue.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-09T18:45:16Z) - BotChat: Evaluating LLMs' Capabilities of Having Multi-Turn Dialogues [72.65163468440434]
This report provides a preliminary evaluation of existing large language models for human-style multi-turn chatting.
We prompt large language models (LLMs) to generate a full multi-turn dialogue based on the ChatSEED, utterance by utterance.
We find GPT-4 can generate human-style multi-turn dialogues with impressive quality, significantly outperforms its counterparts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-20T16:53:51Z) - KETOD: Knowledge-Enriched Task-Oriented Dialogue [77.59814785157877]
Existing studies in dialogue system research mostly treat task-oriented dialogue and chit-chat as separate domains.
We investigate how task-oriented dialogue and knowledge-grounded chit-chat can be effectively integrated into a single model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-11T16:01:03Z) - TOD-BERT: Pre-trained Natural Language Understanding for Task-Oriented
Dialogue [113.45485470103762]
In this work, we unify nine human-human and multi-turn task-oriented dialogue datasets for language modeling.
To better model dialogue behavior during pre-training, we incorporate user and system tokens into the masked language modeling.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-15T04:09:05Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.