Strategic AI adoption in SMEs: A Prescriptive Framework

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.11825v1
• Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2024 09:49:37 GMT
• Title: Strategic AI adoption in SMEs: A Prescriptive Framework
• Authors: Atif Hussain, Rana Rizwan,
• Abstract summary: The adoption of AI technologies in SMEs faces significant barriers, primarily related to cost, lack of technical skills, and employee acceptance. This study proposes a comprehensive, phased framework designed to facilitate the effective adoption of AI in SMEs.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly acknowledged as a vital component for the advancement and competitiveness of modern organizations, including small and medium enterprises (SMEs). However, the adoption of AI technologies in SMEs faces significant barriers, primarily related to cost, lack of technical skills, and employee acceptance. This study proposes a comprehensive, phased framework designed to facilitate the effective adoption of AI in SMEs by systematically addressing these barriers. The framework begins with raising awareness and securing commitment from leadership, followed by the adoption of low-cost, general-purpose AI tools to build technical competence and foster a positive attitude towards AI. As familiarity with AI technologies increases, the framework advocates for the integration of task-specific AI tools to enhance efficiency and productivity. Subsequently, it guides organizations towards the in-house development of generative AI tools, providing greater customization and control. Finally, the framework addresses the development of discriminative AI models to meet highly specific and precision-oriented tasks. By providing a structured and incremental approach, this framework ensures that SMEs can navigate the complexities of AI integration effectively, driving innovation, efficiency, and competitive advantage. This study contributes to the field by offering a practical, prescriptive framework tailored to the unique needs of SMEs, facilitating the successful adoption of AI technologies and positioning these organizations for sustained growth in a competitive landscape.

Related papers

• Engineering Trustworthy AI: A Developer Guide for Empirical Risk Minimization [53.80919781981027]
  Key requirements for trustworthy AI can be translated into design choices for the components of empirical risk minimization. We hope to provide actionable guidance for building AI systems that meet emerging standards for trustworthiness of AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-25T07:53:32Z)
• Choosing the Right Path for AI Integration in Engineering Companies: A Strategic Guide [4.327763441385369]
  The paper covers the entire life cycle of building AI solutions, from initial business understanding to deployment and further evolution. The framework might also help engineering companies choose the optimum AI approach to create business value.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-25T11:58:37Z)
• Federated Learning-Empowered AI-Generated Content in Wireless Networks [58.48381827268331]
  Federated learning (FL) can be leveraged to improve learning efficiency and achieve privacy protection for AIGC. We present FL-based techniques for empowering AIGC, and aim to enable users to generate diverse, personalized, and high-quality content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-14T04:13:11Z)
• International Institutions for Advanced AI [47.449762587672986]
  International institutions may have an important role to play in ensuring advanced AI systems benefit humanity. This paper identifies a set of governance functions that could be performed at an international level to address these challenges. It groups these functions into four institutional models that exhibit internal synergies and have precedents in existing organizations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-10T16:55:55Z)
• Towards a Capability Assessment Model for the Comprehension and Adoption of AI in Organisations [0.0]
  This article presents a 5-level AI Capability Assessment Model (AI-CAM) and a related AI Capabilities Matrix (AI-CM) The AI-CAM covers the core capability dimensions (business, data, technology, organisation, AI skills, risks, and ethical considerations) required at the five capability maturity levels to achieve optimal use of AI in organisations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-25T10:43:54Z)
• Responsible AI Implementation: A Human-centered Framework for Accelerating the Innovation Process [0.8481798330936974]
  This paper proposes a theoretical framework for responsible artificial intelligence (AI) implementation. The proposed framework emphasizes a synergistic business technology approach for the agile co-creation process. The framework emphasizes establishing and maintaining trust throughout the human-centered design and agile development of AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-15T06:24:01Z)
• Designing an AI-Driven Talent Intelligence Solution: Exploring Big Data to extend the TOE Framework [0.0]
  This study aims to identify the new requirements for developing AI-oriented artifacts to address talent management issues. A design science method is adopted for conducting the experimental study with structured machine learning techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-25T10:42:50Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)
• Qlib: An AI-oriented Quantitative Investment Platform [86.8580406876954]
  AI technologies have raised new challenges to the quantitative investment system. Qlib aims to realize the potential, empower the research, and create the value of AI technologies in quantitative investment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-22T12:57:10Z)
• Where Responsible AI meets Reality: Practitioner Perspectives on Enablers for shifting Organizational Practices [3.119859292303396]
  This paper examines and seeks to offer a framework for analyzing how organizational culture and structure impact the effectiveness of responsible AI initiatives in practice. We present the results of semi-structured qualitative interviews with practitioners working in industry, investigating common challenges, ethical tensions, and effective enablers for responsible AI initiatives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-22T15:57:30Z)
• Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable Claims [59.64274607533249]
  AI developers need to make verifiable claims to which they can be held accountable. This report suggests various steps that different stakeholders can take to improve the verifiability of claims made about AI systems. We analyze ten mechanisms for this purpose--spanning institutions, software, and hardware--and make recommendations aimed at implementing, exploring, or improving those mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-15T17:15:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.