Domain-specific long text classification from sparse relevant information

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.13253v1
• Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 17:54:19 GMT
• Title: Domain-specific long text classification from sparse relevant information
• Authors: Célia D'Cruz, Jean-Marc Bereder, Frédéric Precioso, Michel Riveill,
• Abstract summary: We propose a hierarchical model which exploits a short list of potential target terms to retrieve candidate sentences. A pooling of the term(s) embedding(s) entails the document representation to be classified. We show that our narrower hierarchical model is better than larger language models for retrieving relevant long documents in a domain-specific context.
• Score: 3.3611255314174815
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models have undoubtedly revolutionized the Natural Language Processing field, the current trend being to promote one-model-for-all tasks (sentiment analysis, translation, etc.). However, the statistical mechanisms at work in the larger language models struggle to exploit the relevant information when it is very sparse, when it is a weak signal. This is the case, for example, for the classification of long domain-specific documents, when the relevance relies on a single relevant word or on very few relevant words from technical jargon. In the medical domain, it is essential to determine whether a given report contains critical information about a patient's condition. This critical information is often based on one or few specific isolated terms. In this paper, we propose a hierarchical model which exploits a short list of potential target terms to retrieve candidate sentences and represent them into the contextualized embedding of the target term(s) they contain. A pooling of the term(s) embedding(s) entails the document representation to be classified. We evaluate our model on one public medical document benchmark in English and on one private French medical dataset. We show that our narrower hierarchical model is better than larger language models for retrieving relevant long documents in a domain-specific context.

Related papers

• Medical Vision-Language Pre-Training for Brain Abnormalities [96.1408455065347]
  We show how to automatically collect medical image-text aligned data for pretraining from public resources such as PubMed. In particular, we present a pipeline that streamlines the pre-training process by initially collecting a large brain image-text dataset. We also investigate the unique challenge of mapping subfigures to subcaptions in the medical domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-27T05:03:42Z)
• Language Models for Text Classification: Is In-Context Learning Enough? [54.869097980761595]
  Recent foundational language models have shown state-of-the-art performance in many NLP tasks in zero- and few-shot settings. An advantage of these models over more standard approaches is the ability to understand instructions written in natural language (prompts) This makes them suitable for addressing text classification problems for domains with limited amounts of annotated instances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-26T12:47:39Z)
• Enhancing Medical Specialty Assignment to Patients using NLP Techniques [0.0]
  We propose an alternative approach that achieves superior performance while being computationally efficient. Specifically, we utilize keywords to train a deep learning architecture that outperforms a language model pretrained on a large corpus of text. Our results demonstrate that utilizing keywords for text classification significantly improves classification performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-09T14:13:45Z)
• Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contexts [88.78803442320246]
  We analyze the performance of language models on two tasks that require identifying relevant information in their input contexts. We find that performance can degrade significantly when changing the position of relevant information. Our analysis provides a better understanding of how language models use their input context and provides new evaluation protocols for future long-context language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-06T17:54:11Z)
• Topics in the Haystack: Extracting and Evaluating Topics beyond Coherence [0.0]
  We propose a method that incorporates a deeper understanding of both sentence and document themes. This allows our model to detect latent topics that may include uncommon words or neologisms. We present correlation coefficients with human identification of intruder words and achieve near-human level results at the word-intrusion task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-30T12:24:25Z)
• The Fellowship of the Authors: Disambiguating Names from Social Network Context [2.3605348648054454]
  Authority lists with extensive textual descriptions for each entity are lacking and ambiguous named entities. We combine BERT-based mention representations with a variety of graph induction strategies and experiment with supervised and unsupervised cluster inference methods. We find that in-domain language model pretraining can significantly improve mention representations, especially for larger corpora.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-31T21:51:55Z)
• Author Clustering and Topic Estimation for Short Texts [69.54017251622211]
  We propose a novel model that expands on the Latent Dirichlet Allocation by modeling strong dependence among the words in the same document. We also simultaneously cluster users, removing the need for post-hoc cluster estimation. Our method performs as well as -- or better -- than traditional approaches to problems arising in short text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-15T20:55:55Z)
• Sentiment analysis in tweets: an assessment study from classical to modern text representation models [59.107260266206445]
  Short texts published on Twitter have earned significant attention as a rich source of information. Their inherent characteristics, such as the informal, and noisy linguistic style, remain challenging to many natural language processing (NLP) tasks. This study fulfils an assessment of existing language models in distinguishing the sentiment expressed in tweets by using a rich collection of 22 datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-29T21:05:28Z)
• XL-WiC: A Multilingual Benchmark for Evaluating Semantic Contextualization [98.61159823343036]
  We present the Word-in-Context dataset (WiC) for assessing the ability to correctly model distinct meanings of a word. We put forward a large multilingual benchmark, XL-WiC, featuring gold standards in 12 new languages. Experimental results show that even when no tagged instances are available for a target language, models trained solely on the English data can attain competitive performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-13T15:32:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.