Leveraging Open Knowledge for Advancing Task Expertise in Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.15915v2
• Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2024 15:12:51 GMT
• Title: Leveraging Open Knowledge for Advancing Task Expertise in Large Language Models
• Authors: Yuncheng Yang, Yulei Qin, Tong Wu, Zihan Xu, Gang Li, Pengcheng Guo, Hang Shao, Yuchen Shi, Ke Li, Xing Sun, Jie Yang, Yun Gu,
• Abstract summary: We introduce few human-annotated samples (i.e., K-shot) for advancing task expertise of large language models with open knowledge. A mixture-of-expert (MoE) system is built to make the best use of individual-yet-complementary knowledge between multiple experts.
• Score: 36.172093066234794
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The cultivation of expertise for large language models (LLMs) to solve tasks of specific areas often requires special-purpose tuning with calibrated behaviors on the expected stable outputs. To avoid huge cost brought by manual preparation of instruction datasets and training resources up to hundreds of hours, the exploitation of open knowledge including a wealth of low rank adaptation (LoRA) models and instruction datasets serves as a good starting point. However, existing methods on model and data selection focus on the performance of general-purpose capabilities while neglecting the knowledge gap exposed in domain-specific deployment. In the present study, we propose to bridge such gap by introducing few human-annotated samples (i.e., K-shot) for advancing task expertise of LLMs with open knowledge. Specifically, we develop an efficient and scalable pipeline to cost-efficiently produce task experts where K-shot data intervene in selecting the most promising expert candidates and the task-relevant instructions. A mixture-of-expert (MoE) system is built to make the best use of individual-yet-complementary knowledge between multiple experts. We unveil the two keys to the success of a MoE system, 1) the abidance by K-shot, and 2) the insistence on diversity. For the former, we ensure that models that truly possess problem-solving abilities on K-shot are selected rather than those blind guessers. Besides, during data selection, instructions that share task-relevant contexts with K-shot are prioritized. For the latter, we highlight the diversity of constituting experts and that of the fine-tuning instructions throughout the model and data selection process. Extensive experimental results confirm the superiority of our approach over existing methods on utilization of open knowledge across various tasks. Our codes will be available at https://github.com/Yaphabates/Rocket.

Related papers

• Learning to Route Among Specialized Experts for Zero-Shot Generalization [39.56470042680907]
  We propose Post-Hoc Adaptive Tokenwise Gating Over an Ocean of Specialized Experts (PHATGOOSE) It learns to route among specialized modules that were produced through parameter-efficient fine-tuning. It does not require simultaneous access to the datasets used to create the specialized models and only requires a modest amount of additional compute after each expert model is trained.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-08T17:43:22Z)
• Rethinking Skill Extraction in the Job Market Domain using Large Language Models [20.256353240384133]
  Skill Extraction involves identifying skills and qualifications mentioned in documents such as job postings and resumes. The reliance on manually annotated data limits the generalizability of such approaches. In this paper, we explore the use of in-context learning to overcome these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T09:23:26Z)
• Knowledge Plugins: Enhancing Large Language Models for Domain-Specific Recommendations [50.81844184210381]
  We propose a general paradigm that augments large language models with DOmain-specific KnowledgE to enhance their performance on practical applications, namely DOKE. This paradigm relies on a domain knowledge extractor, working in three steps: 1) preparing effective knowledge for the task; 2) selecting the knowledge for each specific sample; and 3) expressing the knowledge in an LLM-understandable way.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T07:09:38Z)
• Pre-training Multi-task Contrastive Learning Models for Scientific Literature Understanding [52.723297744257536]
  Pre-trained language models (LMs) have shown effectiveness in scientific literature understanding tasks. We propose a multi-task contrastive learning framework, SciMult, to facilitate common knowledge sharing across different literature understanding tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T16:47:22Z)
• Leveraging Expert Consistency to Improve Algorithmic Decision Support [62.61153549123407]
  We explore the use of historical expert decisions as a rich source of information that can be combined with observed outcomes to narrow the construct gap. We propose an influence function-based methodology to estimate expert consistency indirectly when each case in the data is assessed by a single expert. Our empirical evaluation, using simulations in a clinical setting and real-world data from the child welfare domain, indicates that the proposed approach successfully narrows the construct gap.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-24T05:40:29Z)
• Knowledge-driven Data Construction for Zero-shot Evaluation in Commonsense Question Answering [80.60605604261416]
  We propose a novel neuro-symbolic framework for zero-shot question answering across commonsense tasks. We vary the set of language models, training regimes, knowledge sources, and data generation strategies, and measure their impact across tasks. We show that, while an individual knowledge graph is better suited for specific tasks, a global knowledge graph brings consistent gains across different tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-07T22:52:21Z)
• Learning From Multiple Experts: Self-paced Knowledge Distillation for Long-tailed Classification [106.08067870620218]
  We propose a self-paced knowledge distillation framework, termed Learning From Multiple Experts (LFME) We refer to these models as 'Experts', and the proposed LFME framework aggregates the knowledge from multiple 'Experts' to learn a unified student model. We conduct extensive experiments and demonstrate that our method is able to achieve superior performances compared to state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-06T12:57:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.