BEVal: A Cross-dataset Evaluation Study of BEV Segmentation Models for Autonomous Driving

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.16322v3
• Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:42:31 GMT
• Title: BEVal: A Cross-dataset Evaluation Study of BEV Segmentation Models for Autonomous Driving
• Authors: Manuel Alejandro Diaz-Zapata, Wenqian Liu, Robin Baruffa, Christian Laugier,
• Abstract summary: We conduct a comprehensive cross-dataset evaluation of state-of-the-art BEV segmentation models. We investigate the influence of different sensors, such as cameras and LiDAR, on the models' ability to generalize.
• Score: 3.4113606473878386
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Current research in semantic bird's-eye view segmentation for autonomous driving focuses solely on optimizing neural network models using a single dataset, typically nuScenes. This practice leads to the development of highly specialized models that may fail when faced with different environments or sensor setups, a problem known as domain shift. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive cross-dataset evaluation of state-of-the-art BEV segmentation models to assess their performance across different training and testing datasets and setups, as well as different semantic categories. We investigate the influence of different sensors, such as cameras and LiDAR, on the models' ability to generalize to diverse conditions and scenarios. Additionally, we conduct multi-dataset training experiments that improve models' BEV segmentation performance compared to single-dataset training. Our work addresses the gap in evaluating BEV segmentation models under cross-dataset validation. And our findings underscore the importance of enhancing model generalizability and adaptability to ensure more robust and reliable BEV segmentation approaches for autonomous driving applications. The code for this paper available at https://github.com/manueldiaz96/beval .

Related papers

• Towards Ground-truth-free Evaluation of Any Segmentation in Medical Images [22.36128130052757]
  We build a ground-truth-free evaluation model to assess the quality of segmentations generated by the Segment Anything Model (SAM) and its variants in medical imaging. This evaluation model estimates segmentation quality scores by analyzing the coherence and consistency between the input images and their corresponding segmentation predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-23T10:12:08Z)
• No "Zero-Shot" Without Exponential Data: Pretraining Concept Frequency Determines Multimodal Model Performance [68.18779562801762]
  multimodal models require exponentially more data to achieve linear improvements in downstream "zero-shot" performance. Our study reveals an exponential need for training data which implies that the key to "zero-shot" generalization capabilities under large-scale training paradigms remains to be found.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T17:58:02Z)
• Predictive Analytics of Varieties of Potatoes [2.336821989135698]
  We explore the application of machine learning algorithms specifically to enhance the selection process of Russet potato clones in breeding trials. This study addresses the challenge of efficiently identifying high-yield, disease-resistant, and climate-resilient potato varieties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T00:49:05Z)
• Self-Evolved Diverse Data Sampling for Efficient Instruction Tuning [47.02160072880698]
  We introduce a self-evolving mechanism that allows the model itself to actively sample subsets that are equally or even more effective. The key to our data sampling technique lies in the enhancement of diversity in the chosen subsets. Extensive experiments across three datasets and benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of DiverseEvol.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T14:10:40Z)
• A-Eval: A Benchmark for Cross-Dataset Evaluation of Abdominal Multi-Organ Segmentation [38.644744669074775]
  We introduce A-Eval, a benchmark for the cross-dataset Evaluation ('Eval') of Abdominal ('A') multi-organ segmentation. We employ training sets from four large-scale public datasets: FLARE22, AMOS, WORD, and TotalSegmentator. We evaluate the generalizability of various models using the A-Eval benchmark, with a focus on diverse data usage scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-07T17:59:50Z)
• Consistency Regularization for Generalizable Source-free Domain Adaptation [62.654883736925456]
  Source-free domain adaptation (SFDA) aims to adapt a well-trained source model to an unlabelled target domain without accessing the source dataset. Existing SFDA methods ONLY assess their adapted models on the target training set, neglecting the data from unseen but identically distributed testing sets. We propose a consistency regularization framework to develop a more generalizable SFDA method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-03T07:45:53Z)
• Multi-Domain Joint Training for Person Re-Identification [51.73921349603597]
  Deep learning-based person Re-IDentification (ReID) often requires a large amount of training data to achieve good performance. It appears that collecting more training data from diverse environments tends to improve the ReID performance. We propose an approach called Domain-Camera-Sample Dynamic network (DCSD) whose parameters can be adaptive to various factors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-06T09:20:59Z)
• MSeg: A Composite Dataset for Multi-domain Semantic Segmentation [100.17755160696939]
  We present MSeg, a composite dataset that unifies semantic segmentation datasets from different domains. We reconcile the generalization and bring the pixel-level annotations into alignment by relabeling more than 220,000 object masks in more than 80,000 images. A model trained on MSeg ranks first on the WildDash-v1 leaderboard for robust semantic segmentation, with no exposure to WildDash data during training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-27T16:16:35Z)
• Comparing Test Sets with Item Response Theory [53.755064720563]
  We evaluate 29 datasets using predictions from 18 pretrained Transformer models on individual test examples. We find that Quoref, HellaSwag, and MC-TACO are best suited for distinguishing among state-of-the-art models. We also observe span selection task format, which is used for QA datasets like QAMR or SQuAD2.0, is effective in differentiating between strong and weak models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-01T22:33:53Z)
• ALT-MAS: A Data-Efficient Framework for Active Testing of Machine Learning Algorithms [58.684954492439424]
  We propose a novel framework to efficiently test a machine learning model using only a small amount of labeled test data. The idea is to estimate the metrics of interest for a model-under-test using Bayesian neural network (BNN)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-11T12:14:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.