Vision-Language and Large Language Model Performance in Gastroenterology: GPT, Claude, Llama, Phi, Mistral, Gemma, and Quantized Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.00084v2
• Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 08:22:28 GMT
• Title: Vision-Language and Large Language Model Performance in Gastroenterology: GPT, Claude, Llama, Phi, Mistral, Gemma, and Quantized Models
• Authors: Seyed Amir Ahmad Safavi-Naini, Shuhaib Ali, Omer Shahab, Zahra Shahhoseini, Thomas Savage, Sara Rafiee, Jamil S Samaan, Reem Al Shabeeb, Farah Ladak, Jamie O Yang, Juan Echavarria, Sumbal Babar, Aasma Shaukat, Samuel Margolis, Nicholas P Tatonetti, Girish Nadkarni, Bara El Kurdi, Ali Soroush,
• Abstract summary: This study evaluates the medical reasoning performance of large language models (LLMs) and vision language models (VLMs) in gastroenterology. We used 300 gastroenterology board exam-style multiple-choice questions, 138 of which contain images.
• Score: 0.06555599394344236
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Background and Aims: This study evaluates the medical reasoning performance of large language models (LLMs) and vision language models (VLMs) in gastroenterology. Methods: We used 300 gastroenterology board exam-style multiple-choice questions, 138 of which contain images to systematically assess the impact of model configurations and parameters and prompt engineering strategies utilizing GPT-3.5. Next, we assessed the performance of proprietary and open-source LLMs (versions), including GPT (3.5, 4, 4o, 4omini), Claude (3, 3.5), Gemini (1.0), Mistral, Llama (2, 3, 3.1), Mixtral, and Phi (3), across different interfaces (web and API), computing environments (cloud and local), and model precisions (with and without quantization). Finally, we assessed accuracy using a semiautomated pipeline. Results: Among the proprietary models, GPT-4o (73.7%) and Claude3.5-Sonnet (74.0%) achieved the highest accuracy, outperforming the top open-source models: Llama3.1-405b (64%), Llama3.1-70b (58.3%), and Mixtral-8x7b (54.3%). Among the quantized open-source models, the 6-bit quantized Phi3-14b (48.7%) performed best. The scores of the quantized models were comparable to those of the full-precision models Llama2-7b, Llama2--13b, and Gemma2-9b. Notably, VLM performance on image-containing questions did not improve when the images were provided and worsened when LLM-generated captions were provided. In contrast, a 10% increase in accuracy was observed when images were accompanied by human-crafted image descriptions. Conclusion: In conclusion, while LLMs exhibit robust zero-shot performance in medical reasoning, the integration of visual data remains a challenge for VLMs. Effective deployment involves carefully determining optimal model configurations, encouraging users to consider either the high performance of proprietary models or the flexible adaptability of open-source models.

Related papers

• The Best Instruction-Tuning Data are Those That Fit [17.401088816596054]
  Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) data are crucial for eliciting strong capabilities from pretrained large language models (LLMs) We propose **GRAPE**, a novel SFT framework that accounts for the unique characteristics of the target model. For each instruction, it gathers responses from various LLMs and selects the one with the highest probability measured by the target model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-06T16:31:21Z)
• Expanding Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Multimodal Models with Model, Data, and Test-Time Scaling [128.24325909395188]
  We introduce InternVL 2.5, an advanced multimodal large language model (MLLM) series that builds upon InternVL 2.0. InternVL 2.5 exhibits competitive performance, rivaling leading commercial models such as GPT-4o and Claude-3.5-Sonnet. We hope this model contributes to the open-source community by setting new standards for developing and applying multimodal AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T18:57:08Z)
• A Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models on Mental Illnesses [0.8458496687170665]
  GPT-4 and Llama 3 exhibited superior performance in binary disorder detection, with accuracies reaching up to 85% on certain datasets. prompt engineering played a crucial role in enhancing model performance. Despite promising results, our analysis identified several challenges, including variability in performance across datasets and the need for careful prompt engineering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-24T02:58:52Z)
• Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models for SDG Mapping (Technical Report) [6.789534723913505]
  Large language models (LLMs) enable users to protect data privacy by eliminating the need to provide data to third parties. We compare the performance of various language models on the Sustainable Development Goal mapping task. According to the results of this study, LLaMA 2 and Gemma still have significant room for improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-05T03:05:02Z)
• DataComp-LM: In search of the next generation of training sets for language models [200.5293181577585]
  DataComp for Language Models (DCLM) is a testbed for controlled dataset experiments with the goal of improving language models. We provide a standardized corpus of 240T tokens extracted from Common Crawl, effective pretraining recipes based on the OpenLM framework, and a broad suite of 53 downstream evaluations. Participants in the DCLM benchmark can experiment with data curation strategies such as deduplication, filtering, and data mixing at model scales ranging from 412M to 7B parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T17:42:57Z)
• DEEM: Diffusion Models Serve as the Eyes of Large Language Models for Image Perception [66.88792390480343]
  We propose DEEM, a simple but effective approach that utilizes the generative feedback of diffusion models to align the semantic distributions of the image encoder. DEEM exhibits enhanced robustness and a superior capacity to alleviate model hallucinations while utilizing fewer trainable parameters, less pre-training data, and a smaller base model size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T05:46:04Z)
• How Easy is It to Fool Your Multimodal LLMs? An Empirical Analysis on Deceptive Prompts [54.07541591018305]
  We present MAD-Bench, a benchmark that contains 1000 test samples divided into 5 categories, such as non-existent objects, count of objects, and spatial relationship. We provide a comprehensive analysis of popular MLLMs, ranging from GPT-4v, Reka, Gemini-Pro, to open-sourced models, such as LLaVA-NeXT and MiniCPM-Llama3. While GPT-4o achieves 82.82% accuracy on MAD-Bench, the accuracy of any other model in our experiments ranges from 9% to 50%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T18:31:27Z)
• Large language models for aspect-based sentiment analysis [0.0]
  We assess the performance of GPT-4 and GPT-3.5 in zero shot, few shot and fine-tuned settings. Fine-tuned GPT-3.5 achieves a state-of-the-art F1 score of 83.8 on the joint aspect term extraction and polarity classification task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-27T10:03:21Z)
• Pruning Large Language Models via Accuracy Predictor [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) containing tens of billions of parameters (or even more) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in various NLP tasks. We propose a novel pruning approach: firstly, a training set of a certain number of architecture-accuracy pairs is established, and then a non-neural model is trained as an accuracy predictor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-18T06:38:24Z)
• Improving Visual Grounding by Encouraging Consistent Gradient-based Explanations [58.442103936918805]
  We show that Attention Mask Consistency produces superior visual grounding results than previous methods. AMC is effective, easy to implement, and is general as it can be adopted by any vision-language model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-30T17:55:12Z)
• Sparse MoEs meet Efficient Ensembles [49.313497379189315]
  We study the interplay of two popular classes of such models: ensembles of neural networks and sparse mixture of experts (sparse MoEs) We present Efficient Ensemble of Experts (E$3$), a scalable and simple ensemble of sparse MoEs that takes the best of both classes of models, while using up to 45% fewer FLOPs than a deep ensemble.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-07T11:58:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.