Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Survey of Needs, Techniques, Applications, and Future Direction

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.00265v1
• Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 21:42:17 GMT
• Title: Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Survey of Needs, Techniques, Applications, and Future Direction
• Authors: Melkamu Mersha, Khang Lam, Joseph Wood, Ali AlShami, Jugal Kalita,
• Abstract summary: Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) addresses challenges by providing explanations for how these models make decisions and predictions. Existing studies have examined the fundamental concepts of XAI, its general principles, and the scope of XAI techniques. This paper provides a comprehensive literature review encompassing common terminologies and definitions, the need for XAI, beneficiaries of XAI, a taxonomy of XAI methods, and the application of XAI methods in different application areas.
• Score: 5.417632175667161
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Artificial intelligence models encounter significant challenges due to their black-box nature, particularly in safety-critical domains such as healthcare, finance, and autonomous vehicles. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) addresses these challenges by providing explanations for how these models make decisions and predictions, ensuring transparency, accountability, and fairness. Existing studies have examined the fundamental concepts of XAI, its general principles, and the scope of XAI techniques. However, there remains a gap in the literature as there are no comprehensive reviews that delve into the detailed mathematical representations, design methodologies of XAI models, and other associated aspects. This paper provides a comprehensive literature review encompassing common terminologies and definitions, the need for XAI, beneficiaries of XAI, a taxonomy of XAI methods, and the application of XAI methods in different application areas. The survey is aimed at XAI researchers, XAI practitioners, AI model developers, and XAI beneficiaries who are interested in enhancing the trustworthiness, transparency, accountability, and fairness of their AI models.

Related papers

• Generative Artificial Intelligence Meets Synthetic Aperture Radar: A Survey [49.29751866761522]
  This paper aims to investigate the intersection of GenAI and SAR. First, we illustrate the common data generation-based applications in SAR field. Then, an overview of the latest GenAI models is systematically reviewed. Finally, the corresponding applications in SAR domain are also included.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T03:06:00Z)
• A Survey of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in Financial Time Series Forecasting [1.2937020918620652]
  The field of eXplainable AI (XAI) aims to make AI models more understandable. This paper categorizes XAI approaches that predict financial time series. It provides a comprehensive view of XAI's current role in finance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-22T17:06:19Z)
• Applications of Explainable artificial intelligence in Earth system science [12.454478986296152]
  This review aims to provide a foundational understanding of explainable AI (XAI) XAI offers a set of powerful tools that make the models more transparent. We identify four significant challenges that XAI faces within the Earth system science (ESS) A visionary outlook for ESS envisions a harmonious blend where process-based models govern the known, AI models explore the unknown, and XAI bridges the gap by providing explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-12T15:05:29Z)
• Towards Human Cognition Level-based Experiment Design for Counterfactual Explanations (XAI) [68.8204255655161]
  The emphasis of XAI research appears to have turned to a more pragmatic explanation approach for better understanding. An extensive area where cognitive science research may substantially influence XAI advancements is evaluating user knowledge and feedback. We propose a framework to experiment with generating and evaluating the explanations on the grounds of different cognitive levels of understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-31T19:20:22Z)
• Connecting Algorithmic Research and Usage Contexts: A Perspective of Contextualized Evaluation for Explainable AI [65.44737844681256]
  A lack of consensus on how to evaluate explainable AI (XAI) hinders the advancement of the field. We argue that one way to close the gap is to develop evaluation methods that account for different user requirements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-22T05:17:33Z)
• Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) for Internet of Things: A Survey [1.7205106391379026]
  Black-box nature of Artificial Intelligence (AI) models do not allow users to comprehend and sometimes trust the output created by such model. In AI applications, where not only the results but also the decision paths to the results are critical, such black-box AI models are not sufficient. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) addresses this problem and defines a set of AI models that are interpretable by the users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-07T08:22:30Z)
• Beyond Explaining: Opportunities and Challenges of XAI-Based Model Improvement [75.00655434905417]
  Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is an emerging research field bringing transparency to highly complex machine learning (ML) models. This paper offers a comprehensive overview over techniques that apply XAI practically for improving various properties of ML models. We show empirically through experiments on toy and realistic settings how explanations can help improve properties such as model generalization ability or reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-15T15:44:28Z)
• Counterfactual Explanations as Interventions in Latent Space [62.997667081978825]
  Counterfactual explanations aim to provide to end users a set of features that need to be changed in order to achieve a desired outcome. Current approaches rarely take into account the feasibility of actions needed to achieve the proposed explanations. We present Counterfactual Explanations as Interventions in Latent Space (CEILS), a methodology to generate counterfactual explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-14T20:48:48Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)
• Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): An Engineering Perspective [0.0]
  XAI is a set of techniques and methods to convert the so-called black-box AI algorithms to white-box algorithms. We discuss the stakeholders in XAI and describe the mathematical contours of XAI from engineering perspective. This work is an exploratory study to identify new avenues of research in the field of XAI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-10T19:49:12Z)
• Opportunities and Challenges in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): A Survey [2.7086321720578623]
  Black-box nature of deep neural networks challenges its use in mission critical applications. XAI promotes a set of tools, techniques, and algorithms that can generate high-quality interpretable, intuitive, human-understandable explanations of AI decisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-16T02:58:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.