Mutual Benefit: The Case for Sharing Autonomous Vehicle Data with the Public

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.01342v1
• Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 15:54:59 GMT
• Title: Mutual Benefit: The Case for Sharing Autonomous Vehicle Data with the Public
• Authors: David Goedicke, Natalie Chyi, Alexandra Bremers, Stacey Li, James Grimmelmann, Wendy Ju,
• Abstract summary: We argue for the normative idea that a part of this data should more explicitly benefit the general public by sharing it through a trusted entity as a form of compensation and control for the communities that are being experimented upon.
• Score: 45.26729657448177
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Autonomous driving is a widely researched technology that is frequently tested on public roads. The data generated from these tests represent an essential competitive element for the respective companies moving this technology forward. In this paper, we argue for the normative idea that a part of this data should more explicitly benefit the general public by sharing it through a trusted entity as a form of compensation and control for the communities that are being experimented upon. To support this argument, we highlight what data is available to be shared, make the ethical case for sharing autonomous vehicle data, present case studies in how AV data is currently shared, draw from existing data-sharing platforms from similar transportation industries to make recommendations on how data should be shared and conclude with arguments as to why such data-sharing should be encouraged.

Related papers

• How Safe Is Your Data in Connected and Autonomous Cars: A Consumer Advantage or a Privacy Nightmare ? [21.526036185120287]
  Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) communication enables autonomous cars to generate and exchange substantial amounts of data with real-world entities.<n>This review paper explores the multifaceted nature of data sharing in CAVs, analyzing its contributions to innovation and its associated vulnerabilities.<n>It emphasizes the urgent need for robust policies and ethical data management practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-18T06:45:21Z)
• Conscious Data Contribution via Community-Driven Chain-of-Thought Distillation [4.275696286826178]
  We consider questions of data portability and user autonomy in the context of LLMs that "reason"<n>We show how communities who receive low utility from an available model can aggregate and distill their shared knowledge into an alternate model better aligned with their goals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-20T02:17:18Z)
• Incentivizing Time-Aware Fairness in Data Sharing [73.83854445472149]
  In collaborative data sharing and machine learning, multiple parties aggregate their data resources to train a machine learning model with better performance.<n>Existing frameworks assume that all parties join the collaboration simultaneously, which does not hold in many real-world scenarios.<n>We propose a fair and time-aware data sharing framework, including novel time-aware incentives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T10:29:32Z)
• Privacy-Preserving Data Linkage Across Private and Public Datasets for Collaborative Agriculture Research [1.6000462052866455]
  Digital agriculture raises privacy concerns such as adverse pricing, price discrimination, higher insurance costs, and manipulation of resources. This study introduces a privacy-preserving framework that addresses these risks while allowing secure data sharing for digital agriculture. Our framework enables comprehensive data analysis while protecting privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-09T21:07:13Z)
• How to Drill Into Silos: Creating a Free-to-Use Dataset of Data Subject Access Packages [0.0]
  European Union's General Data Protection Regulation strengthened data subjects' right to access personal data. Subjects' possibilities for actually using controller-provided subject access request packages (SARPs) are severely limited so far. This dataset is publicly provided and shall, in the future, serve as a starting point for researching and comparing novel approaches for practically viable use of SARPs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-05T12:39:51Z)
• Insights from an experiment crowdsourcing data from thousands of US Amazon users: The importance of transparency, money, and data use [6.794366017852433]
  This paper shares an innovative approach to crowdsourcing user data to collect otherwise inaccessible Amazon purchase histories, spanning 5 years, from more than 5000 US users. We developed a data collection tool that prioritizes participant consent and includes an experimental study design. Experiment results (N=6325) reveal both monetary incentives and transparency can significantly increase data sharing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-19T20:45:19Z)
• SoK: The Gap Between Data Rights Ideals and Reality [46.14715472341707]
  Do rights-based privacy laws effectively empower individuals over their data? This paper scrutinizes these approaches by reviewing empirical studies, news articles, and blog posts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-03T21:52:51Z)
• Incentivized Communication for Federated Bandits [67.4682056391551]
  We introduce an incentivized communication problem for federated bandits, where the server shall motivate clients to share data by providing incentives. We propose the first incentivized communication protocol, namely, Inc-FedUCB, that achieves near-optimal regret with provable communication and incentive cost guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-21T00:59:20Z)
• Assessing Scientific Contributions in Data Sharing Spaces [64.16762375635842]
  This paper introduces the SCIENCE-index, a blockchain-based metric measuring a researcher's scientific contributions. To incentivize researchers to share their data, the SCIENCE-index is augmented to include a data-sharing parameter. Our model is evaluated by comparing the distribution of its output for geographically diverse researchers to that of the h-index.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-18T19:17:47Z)
• Contributing to Accessibility Datasets: Reflections on Sharing Study Data by Blind People [14.625384963263327]
  We present a pair of studies where 13 blind participants engage in data capturing activities. We see how different factors influence blind participants' willingness to share study data as they assess risk-benefit tradeoffs. The majority support sharing of their data to improve technology but also express concerns over commercial use, associated metadata, and the lack of transparency about the impact of their data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-09T00:42:18Z)
• Synthetic Data: Methods, Use Cases, and Risks [11.413309528464632]
  A possible alternative gaining momentum in both the research community and industry is to share synthetic data instead. We provide a gentle introduction to synthetic data and discuss its use cases, the privacy challenges that are still unaddressed, and its inherent limitations as an effective privacy-enhancing technology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-01T16:35:33Z)
• Data Sharing Markets [95.13209326119153]
  We study a setup where each agent can be both buyer and seller of data. We consider two cases: bilateral data exchange (trading data with data) and unilateral data exchange (trading data with money)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-19T06:00:34Z)
• Representative & Fair Synthetic Data [68.8204255655161]
  We present a framework to incorporate fairness constraints into the self-supervised learning process. We generate a representative as well as fair version of the UCI Adult census data set. We consider representative & fair synthetic data a promising future building block to teach algorithms not on historic worlds, but rather on the worlds that we strive to live in.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-07T09:19:46Z)
• Beyond privacy regulations: an ethical approach to data usage in transportation [64.86110095869176]
  We describe how Federated Machine Learning can be applied to the transportation sector. We see Federated Learning as a method that enables us to process privacy-sensitive data, while respecting customer's privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-01T15:10:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.