TSO: Self-Training with Scaled Preference Optimization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.02118v1
• Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2024 05:37:01 GMT
• Title: TSO: Self-Training with Scaled Preference Optimization
• Authors: Kaihui Chen, Hao Yi, Qingyang Li, Tianyu Qi, Yulan Hu, Fuzheng Zhang, Yong Liu,
• Abstract summary: We propose TSO, a framework for preference optimization that conducts self-training preference learning without training an additional reward model. TSO enhances the diversity of responses by constructing a model matrix and incorporating human preference responses. Experimental results demonstrate that TSO outperforms existing mainstream methods on various alignment evaluation benchmarks.
• Score: 14.3799656174528
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Enhancing the conformity of large language models (LLMs) to human preferences remains an ongoing research challenge. Recently, offline approaches such as Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) have gained prominence as attractive options due to offering effective improvement in simple, efficient, and stable without interactions with reward models. However, these offline preference optimization methods highly rely on the quality of pairwise preference samples. Meanwhile, numerous iterative methods require additional training of reward models to select positive and negative samples from the model's own generated responses for preference learning. Furthermore, as LLMs' capabilities advance, it is quite challenging to continuously construct high-quality positive and negative preference instances from the model's outputs due to the lack of diversity. To tackle these challenges, we propose TSO, or Self-Training with Scaled Preference Optimization, a framework for preference optimization that conducts self-training preference learning without training an additional reward model. TSO enhances the diversity of responses by constructing a model matrix and incorporating human preference responses. Furthermore, TSO introduces corrections for model preference errors through human and AI feedback. Finally, TSO adopts iterative and dual clip reward strategies to update the reference model and its responses, adaptively adjusting preference data and balancing the optimization process. Experimental results demonstrate that TSO outperforms existing mainstream methods on various alignment evaluation benchmarks, providing practical insight into preference data construction and model training strategies in the alignment domain.

Related papers

• Dynamic Rewarding with Prompt Optimization Enables Tuning-free Self-Alignment of Language Models [54.381650481255235]
  We introduce a new tuning-free approach for self-alignment, Dynamic Rewarding with Prompt Optimization (O) Our approach leverages a search-based optimization framework that allows LLMs to iteratively self-improve and craft the optimal alignment instructions. Empirical evaluations on eight recent LLMs, both open and closed-sourced, demonstrate that DRPO significantly enhances alignment performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-13T16:15:38Z)
• RosePO: Aligning LLM-based Recommenders with Human Values [38.029251417802044]
  We propose a general framework -- Recommendation with smoothing personalized Preference Optimization (RosePO) RosePO better aligns with customized human values during the post-training stage. Evaluation on three real-world datasets demonstrates the effectiveness of our method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T12:54:34Z)
• Margin Matching Preference Optimization: Enhanced Model Alignment with Granular Feedback [64.67540769692074]
  Large language models (LLMs) fine-tuned with alignment techniques, such as reinforcement learning from human feedback, have been instrumental in developing some of the most capable AI systems to date. We introduce an approach called Margin Matching Preference Optimization (MMPO), which incorporates relative quality margins into optimization, leading to improved LLM policies and reward models. Experiments with both human and AI feedback data demonstrate that MMPO consistently outperforms baseline methods, often by a substantial margin, on popular benchmarks including MT-bench and RewardBench.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T04:56:11Z)
• Self-supervised Preference Optimization: Enhance Your Language Model with Preference Degree Awareness [27.43137305486112]
  We propose a novel Self-supervised Preference Optimization (SPO) framework, which constructs a self-supervised preference degree loss combined with the alignment loss. The results demonstrate that SPO can be seamlessly integrated with existing preference optimization methods to achieve state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-26T12:37:26Z)
• Inverse-Q*: Token Level Reinforcement Learning for Aligning Large Language Models Without Preference Data [25.844968873581244]
  Inverse-Q* is an innovative framework that transcends traditional RL methods by optimizing token-level reinforcement learning. Our results suggest that Inverse-Q* offers a practical and robust alternative to conventional RLHF approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-27T08:43:32Z)
• Bridging and Modeling Correlations in Pairwise Data for Direct Preference Optimization [75.1240295759264]
  We propose an effective framework for Bridging and Modeling Correlations in pairwise data, named BMC. We increase the consistency and informativeness of the pairwise preference signals through targeted modifications. We identify that DPO alone is insufficient to model these correlations and capture nuanced variations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-14T11:29:47Z)
• Self-Augmented Preference Optimization: Off-Policy Paradigms for Language Model Alignment [104.18002641195442]
  We introduce Self-Augmented Preference Optimization (SAPO), an effective and scalable training paradigm that does not require existing paired data. Building on the self-play concept, which autonomously generates negative responses, we further incorporate an off-policy learning pipeline to enhance data exploration and exploitation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-31T14:21:04Z)
• Self-Exploring Language Models: Active Preference Elicitation for Online Alignment [88.56809269990625]
  We propose a bilevel objective optimistically biased towards potentially high-reward responses to actively explore out-of-distribution regions. Our experimental results demonstrate that when fine-tuned on Zephyr-7B-SFT and Llama-3-8B-Instruct models, Self-Exploring Language Models (SELM) significantly boosts the performance on instruction-following benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T17:59:07Z)
• Multi-Reference Preference Optimization for Large Language Models [56.84730239046117]
  We introduce a novel closed-form formulation for direct preference optimization using multiple reference models. The resulting algorithm, Multi-Reference Preference Optimization (MRPO), leverages broader prior knowledge from diverse reference models. Our experiments demonstrate that LLMs finetuned with MRPO generalize better in various preference data, regardless of data scarcity or abundance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-26T00:29:04Z)
• West-of-N: Synthetic Preferences for Self-Improving Reward Models [20.643537269666137]
  We present a novel approach to improve reward model quality by generating synthetic preference data. We find that this approach improves the performance of any reward model, with an effect comparable to the addition of a similar quantity of human preference data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-22T16:24:43Z)
• Statistical Rejection Sampling Improves Preference Optimization [42.57245965632205]
  We introduce a novel approach to source preference data from the target optimal policy using rejection sampling. We also propose a unified framework that enhances the loss functions used in both Sequence Likelihood (SLiC) and Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) from a preference modeling standpoint.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-13T01:07:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.