Evaluating authenticity and quality of image captions via sentiment and semantic analyses
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.09560v1
- Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2024 23:50:23 GMT
- Title: Evaluating authenticity and quality of image captions via sentiment and semantic analyses
- Authors: Aleksei Krotov, Alison Tebo, Dylan K. Picart, Aaron Dean Algave,
- Abstract summary: Deep learning relies heavily on huge amounts of labelled data for tasks such as natural language processing and computer vision.
In image-to-text or image-to-image pipelines, opinion (sentiment) may be inadvertently learned by a model from human-generated image captions.
This study proposes an evaluation method focused on sentiment and semantic richness.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: The growth of deep learning (DL) relies heavily on huge amounts of labelled data for tasks such as natural language processing and computer vision. Specifically, in image-to-text or image-to-image pipelines, opinion (sentiment) may be inadvertently learned by a model from human-generated image captions. Additionally, learning may be affected by the variety and diversity of the provided captions. While labelling large datasets has largely relied on crowd-sourcing or data-worker pools, evaluating the quality of such training data is crucial. This study proposes an evaluation method focused on sentiment and semantic richness. That method was applied to the COCO-MS dataset, comprising approximately 150K images with segmented objects and corresponding crowd-sourced captions. We employed pre-trained models (Twitter-RoBERTa-base and BERT-base) to extract sentiment scores and variability of semantic embeddings from captions. The relation of the sentiment score and semantic variability with object categories was examined using multiple linear regression. Results indicate that while most captions were neutral, about 6% of the captions exhibited strong sentiment influenced by specific object categories. Semantic variability of within-image captions remained low and uncorrelated with object categories. Model-generated captions showed less than 1.5% of strong sentiment which was not influenced by object categories and did not correlate with the sentiment of the respective human-generated captions. This research demonstrates an approach to assess the quality of crowd- or worker-sourced captions informed by image content.
Related papers
- What Makes for Good Image Captions? [50.48589893443939]
Our framework posits that good image captions should balance three key aspects: informationally sufficient, minimally redundant, and readily comprehensible by humans.
We introduce the Pyramid of Captions (PoCa) method, which generates enriched captions by integrating local and global visual information.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-01T12:49:57Z) - Vocabulary-free Image Classification and Semantic Segmentation [71.78089106671581]
We introduce the Vocabulary-free Image Classification (VIC) task, which aims to assign a class from an un-constrained language-induced semantic space to an input image without needing a known vocabulary.
VIC is challenging due to the vastness of the semantic space, which contains millions of concepts, including fine-grained categories.
We propose Category Search from External Databases (CaSED), a training-free method that leverages a pre-trained vision-language model and an external database.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-16T19:27:21Z) - Vision Language Model-based Caption Evaluation Method Leveraging Visual
Context Extraction [27.00018283430169]
This paper presents VisCE$2$, a vision language model-based caption evaluation method.
Our method focuses on visual context, which refers to the detailed content of images, including objects, attributes, and relationships.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-28T01:29:36Z) - Vocabulary-free Image Classification [75.38039557783414]
We formalize a novel task, termed as Vocabulary-free Image Classification (VIC)
VIC aims to assign to an input image a class that resides in an unconstrained language-induced semantic space, without the prerequisite of a known vocabulary.
CaSED is a method that exploits a pre-trained vision-language model and an external vision-language database to address VIC in a training-free manner.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-01T17:19:43Z) - Revising Image-Text Retrieval via Multi-Modal Entailment [25.988058843564335]
Many-to-many matching phenomenon is quite common in the widely-used image-text retrieval datasets.
We propose a multi-modal entailment classifier to determine whether a sentence is entailed by an image plus its linked captions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-22T07:58:54Z) - Deep Learning Approaches on Image Captioning: A Review [0.5852077003870417]
Image captioning aims to generate natural language descriptions for visual content in the form of still images.
Deep learning and vision-language pre-training techniques have revolutionized the field, leading to more sophisticated methods and improved performance.
We address the challenges faced in this field by emphasizing issues such as object hallucination, missing context, illumination conditions, contextual understanding, and referring expressions.
We identify several potential future directions for research in this area, which include tackling the information misalignment problem between image and text modalities, mitigating dataset bias, incorporating vision-language pre-training methods to enhance caption generation, and developing improved evaluation tools to accurately
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-31T00:39:37Z) - Transparent Human Evaluation for Image Captioning [70.03979566548823]
We develop a rubric-based human evaluation protocol for image captioning models.
We show that human-generated captions show substantially higher quality than machine-generated ones.
We hope that this work will promote a more transparent evaluation protocol for image captioning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-17T07:09:59Z) - Group-based Distinctive Image Captioning with Memory Attention [45.763534774116856]
Group-based Distinctive Captioning Model (GdisCap) improves the distinctiveness of image captions.
New evaluation metric, distinctive word rate (DisWordRate) is proposed to measure the distinctiveness of captions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-20T12:46:36Z) - Intrinsic Image Captioning Evaluation [53.51379676690971]
We propose a learning based metrics for image captioning, which we call Intrinsic Image Captioning Evaluation(I2CE)
Experiment results show that our proposed method can keep robust performance and give more flexible scores to candidate captions when encountered with semantic similar expression or less aligned semantics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-14T08:36:05Z) - Improving Image Captioning with Better Use of Captions [65.39641077768488]
We present a novel image captioning architecture to better explore semantics available in captions and leverage that to enhance both image representation and caption generation.
Our models first construct caption-guided visual relationship graphs that introduce beneficial inductive bias using weakly supervised multi-instance learning.
During generation, the model further incorporates visual relationships using multi-task learning for jointly predicting word and object/predicate tag sequences.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-21T14:10:47Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.