Exploring the Performance-Reproducibility Trade-off in Quality-Diversity

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.13315v1
• Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 08:20:31 GMT
• Title: Exploring the Performance-Reproducibility Trade-off in Quality-Diversity
• Authors: Manon Flageat, Hannah Janmohamed, Bryan Lim, Antoine Cully,
• Abstract summary: Quality-Diversity (QD) algorithms have exhibited promising results across many domains and applications. However, uncertainty in fitness and behaviour estimations of solutions remains a major challenge when QD is used in complex real-world applications. We propose four new a-priori QD algorithms that find optimal solutions for given preferences over the trade-offs.
• Score: 7.858994681440057
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Quality-Diversity (QD) algorithms have exhibited promising results across many domains and applications. However, uncertainty in fitness and behaviour estimations of solutions remains a major challenge when QD is used in complex real-world applications. While several approaches have been proposed to improve the performance in uncertain applications, many fail to address a key challenge: determining how to prioritise solutions that perform consistently under uncertainty, in other words, solutions that are reproducible. Most prior methods improve fitness and reproducibility jointly, ignoring the possibility that they could be contradictory objectives. For example, in robotics, solutions may reliably walk at 90% of the maximum velocity in uncertain environments, while solutions that walk faster are also more prone to falling over. As this is a trade-off, neither one of these two solutions is "better" than the other. Thus, algorithms cannot intrinsically select one solution over the other, but can only enforce given preferences over these two contradictory objectives. In this paper, we formalise this problem as the performance-reproducibility trade-off for uncertain QD. We propose four new a-priori QD algorithms that find optimal solutions for given preferences over the trade-offs. We also propose an a-posteriori QD algorithm for when these preferences cannot be defined in advance. Our results show that our approaches successfully find solutions that satisfy given preferences. Importantly, by simply accounting for this trade-off, our approaches perform better than existing uncertain QD methods. This suggests that considering the performance-reproducibility trade-off unlocks important stepping stones that are usually missed when only performance is optimised.

Related papers

• Quality-Diversity Algorithms Can Provably Be Helpful for Optimization [24.694984679399315]
  Quality-Diversity (QD) algorithms aim to find a set of high-performing, yet diverse solutions. This paper tries to shed some light on the optimization ability of QD algorithms via rigorous running time analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-19T07:40:24Z)
• Benchmark tasks for Quality-Diversity applied to Uncertain domains [1.5469452301122175]
  We introduce a set of 8 easy-to-implement and lightweight tasks, split into 3 main categories. We identify the key uncertainty properties to easily define UQD benchmark tasks. All our tasks build on the Redundant Arm: a common QD environment that is lightweight and easily replicable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-24T21:23:26Z)
• Efficient Quality-Diversity Optimization through Diverse Quality Species [3.428706362109921]
  We show that a diverse population of solutions can be found without the limitation of needing an archive or defining the range of behaviors in advance. We propose Diverse Quality Species (DQS) as an alternative to archive-based Quality-Diversity (QD) algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-14T23:15:51Z)
• Don't Bet on Luck Alone: Enhancing Behavioral Reproducibility of Quality-Diversity Solutions in Uncertain Domains [2.639902239625779]
  We introduce Archive Reproducibility Improvement Algorithm (ARIA) ARIA is a plug-and-play approach that improves the quality of solutions present in an archive. We show that our algorithm enhances the quality and descriptor space coverage of any given archive by at least 50%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-07T14:45:14Z)
• Learning Proximal Operators to Discover Multiple Optima [66.98045013486794]
  We present an end-to-end method to learn the proximal operator across non-family problems. We show that for weakly-ized objectives and under mild conditions, the method converges globally.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-28T05:53:28Z)
• Few-shot Quality-Diversity Optimization [50.337225556491774]
  Quality-Diversity (QD) optimization has been shown to be effective tools in dealing with deceptive minima and sparse rewards in Reinforcement Learning. We show that, given examples from a task distribution, information about the paths taken by optimization in parameter space can be leveraged to build a prior population, which when used to initialize QD methods in unseen environments, allows for few-shot adaptation. Experiments carried in both sparse and dense reward settings using robotic manipulation and navigation benchmarks show that it considerably reduces the number of generations that are required for QD optimization in these environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-14T17:12:20Z)
• A Mutual Information Maximization Approach for the Spurious Solution Problem in Weakly Supervised Question Answering [60.768146126094955]
  Weakly supervised question answering usually has only the final answers as supervision signals. There may exist many spurious solutions that coincidentally derive the correct answer, but training on such solutions can hurt model performance. We propose to explicitly exploit such semantic correlations by maximizing the mutual information between question-answer pairs and predicted solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-14T05:47:41Z)
• Modeling the Second Player in Distributionally Robust Optimization [90.25995710696425]
  We argue for the use of neural generative models to characterize the worst-case distribution. This approach poses a number of implementation and optimization challenges. We find that the proposed approach yields models that are more robust than comparable baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-18T14:26:26Z)
• Global Optimization of Objective Functions Represented by ReLU Networks [77.55969359556032]
  Neural networks can learn complex, non- adversarial functions, and it is challenging to guarantee their correct behavior in safety-critical contexts. Many approaches exist to find failures in networks (e.g., adversarial examples), but these cannot guarantee the absence of failures. We propose an approach that integrates the optimization process into the verification procedure, achieving better performance than the naive approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-07T08:19:48Z)
• Combining Deep Learning and Optimization for Security-Constrained Optimal Power Flow [94.24763814458686]
  Security-constrained optimal power flow (SCOPF) is fundamental in power systems. Modeling of APR within the SCOPF problem results in complex large-scale mixed-integer programs. This paper proposes a novel approach that combines deep learning and robust optimization techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-14T12:38:21Z)
• Fast and stable MAP-Elites in noisy domains using deep grids [1.827510863075184]
  Deep-Grid MAP-Elites is a variant of the MAP-Elites algorithm that uses an archive of similar previously encountered solutions to approximate the performance of a solution. We show that this simple approach is significantly more resilient to noise on the behavioural descriptors, while achieving competitive performances in terms of fitness optimisation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-25T08:47:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.