An Empirical Study of Refactoring Engine Bugs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.14610v1
• Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 22:09:39 GMT
• Title: An Empirical Study of Refactoring Engine Bugs
• Authors: Haibo Wang, Zhuolin Xu, Huaien Zhang, Nikolaos Tsantalis, Shin Hwei Tan,
• Abstract summary: We present the first systematic study of engine bugs by analyzing bugs in Eclipse, IntelliJ IDEA, and Netbeans. We analyzed these bugs according to their types, symptoms, root causes, and triggering conditions. Our transferability study revealed 130 new bugs in the latest version of those engines.
• Score: 7.412890903261693
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Refactoring is a critical process in software development, aiming at improving the internal structure of code while preserving its external behavior. Refactoring engines are integral components of modern Integrated Development Environments (IDEs) and can automate or semi-automate this process to enhance code readability, reduce complexity, and improve the maintainability of software products. Like traditional software systems, refactoring engines can generate incorrect refactored programs, resulting in unexpected behaviors or even crashes. In this paper, we present the first systematic study of refactoring engine bugs by analyzing bugs arising in three popular refactoring engines (i.e., Eclipse, IntelliJ IDEA, and Netbeans). We analyzed these bugs according to their refactoring types, symptoms, root causes, and triggering conditions. We obtained 12 findings and provided a series of valuable guidelines for future work on refactoring bug detection and debugging. Furthermore, our transferability study revealed 130 new bugs in the latest version of those refactoring engines. Among the 21 bugs we submitted, 10 bugs are confirmed by their developers, and seven of them have already been fixed.

Related papers

• Build Code Needs Maintenance Too: A Study on Refactoring and Technical Debt in Build Systems [2.189169499230464]
  In modern software engineering, build systems play the crucial role of facilitating the conversion of source code into software artifacts. Recent research has explored high-level causes of build failures, but has largely overlooked the structural properties of build files.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-02T17:07:38Z)
• Refactoring Detection in C++ Programs with RefactoringMiner++ [45.045206894182776]
  We present RefactoringMiner++, a detection tool based on the current state of the art: RefactoringMiner 3. While the latter focuses exclusively on Java, our tool is seeded -- to the best of our knowledge -- the first publicly available detection tool for C++ projects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-24T23:17:35Z)
• Testing Refactoring Engine via Historical Bug Report driven LLM [6.852749659993347]
  Refactoring is the process of restructuring existing code without changing its external behavior. We propose RETESTER, a framework for automated engine testing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-16T23:31:49Z)
• Understanding Code Understandability Improvements in Code Reviews [79.16476505761582]
  We analyzed 2,401 code review comments from Java open-source projects on GitHub. 83.9% of suggestions for improvement were accepted and integrated, with fewer than 1% later reverted.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-29T12:21:23Z)
• Investigating the Transferability of Code Repair for Low-Resource Programming Languages [57.62712191540067]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performance on code generation tasks. Recent works augment the code repair process by integrating modern techniques such as chain-of-thought reasoning or distillation. We investigate the benefits of distilling code repair for both high and low resource languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-21T05:05:39Z)
• Insights into Deep Learning Refactoring: Bridging the Gap Between Practices and Expectations [13.084553746852382]
  Deep learning software has become progressively complex as the software evolves. The insight of code in the context of deep learning is still unclear. Research and the development of related tools are crucial for improving project maintainability and code quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-08T07:35:14Z)
• ReGAL: Refactoring Programs to Discover Generalizable Abstractions [59.05769810380928]
  Generalizable Abstraction Learning (ReGAL) is a method for learning a library of reusable functions via codeization. We find that the shared function libraries discovered by ReGAL make programs easier to predict across diverse domains. For CodeLlama-13B, ReGAL results in absolute accuracy increases of 11.5% on LOGO, 26.1% on date understanding, and 8.1% on TextCraft, outperforming GPT-3.5 in two of three domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T18:45:30Z)
• Automating Source Code Refactoring in the Classroom [15.194527511076725]
  This paper discusses the results of an experiment in the that involved carrying out various classroom activities for the purpose of removing antipatterns using Jodorant, an Eclipse plugin that supports antipatterns detection and correction. The results of the quantitative and qualitative analysis with 171 students show that students tend to appreciate the idea of learning, and are satisfied with various aspects of the JDeodorant plugin's operation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-05T18:46:00Z)
• Empirical Evaluation of a Live Environment for Extract Method Refactoring [0.0]
  We developed a Live Refactoring Environment that visually identifies, recommends, and applies Extract Methods. Our results were significantly different and better than the ones from the code manually without further help.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-20T16:36:02Z)
• Predicting the Impact of Batch Refactoring Code Smells on Application Resource Consumption [3.5557219875516646]
  This paper determines the relationship between software code smell batch, and resource consumption. Next, it aims to design algorithms to predict the impact of code smell on resource consumption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-27T19:28:05Z)
• RefBERT: A Two-Stage Pre-trained Framework for Automatic Rename Refactoring [57.8069006460087]
  We study automatic rename on variable names, which is considered more challenging than other rename activities. We propose RefBERT, a two-stage pre-trained framework for rename on variable names. We show that the generated variable names of RefBERT are more accurate and meaningful than those produced by the existing method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-28T12:29:39Z)
• Do code refactorings influence the merge effort? [80.1936417993664]
  Multiple contributors frequently change the source code in parallel to implement new features, fix bugs, existing code, and make other changes. These simultaneous changes need to be merged into the same version of the source code. Studies show that 10 to 20 percent of all merge attempts result in conflicts, which require the manual developer's intervention to complete the process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-10T13:24:59Z)
• BigIssue: A Realistic Bug Localization Benchmark [89.8240118116093]
  BigIssue is a benchmark for realistic bug localization. We provide a general benchmark with a diversity of real and synthetic Java bugs. We hope to advance the state of the art in bug localization, in turn improving APR performance and increasing its applicability to the modern development cycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-21T20:17:53Z)
• How We Refactor and How We Document it? On the Use of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms to Classify Refactoring Documentation [25.626914797750487]
  Refactoring is the art of improving the design of a system without altering its external behavior. This study categorizes commits into 3 categories, namely, Internal QA, External QA, and Code Smell Resolution, along with the traditional BugFix and Functional categories. To better understand our classification results, we analyzed commit messages to extract patterns that developers regularly use to describe their smells.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-26T20:33:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.