Related papers: Tesla's Autopilot: Ethics and Tragedy

Tesla's Autopilot: Ethics and Tragedy

URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.17380v1
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 21:53:33 GMT
Title: Tesla's Autopilot: Ethics and Tragedy
Authors: Aravinda Jatavallabha,
Abstract summary: Using a seven-step ethical decision-making process, it examines user behavior, system constraints, and regulatory implications. This incident prompts a broader evaluation of ethical challenges in the automotive industry's adoption of autonomous technologies.
Score: 0.0
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Abstract: This case study delves into the ethical ramifications of an incident involving Tesla's Autopilot, emphasizing Tesla Motors' moral responsibility. Using a seven-step ethical decision-making process, it examines user behavior, system constraints, and regulatory implications. This incident prompts a broader evaluation of ethical challenges in the automotive industry's adoption of autonomous technologies, urging a reconsideration of industry norms and legal frameworks. The analysis offers a succinct exploration of ethical considerations in evolving technological landscapes.

Related papers

Automating the Practice of Science -- Opportunities, Challenges, and Implications [48.54225838534946]
This article evaluates the scope of automation within scientific practice and assesses recent approaches. By discussing the motivations behind automated science, analyzing the hurdles encountered, and examining its implications, this article invites researchers, policymakers, and stakeholders to navigate the frontier of automated scientific practice.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-27T15:51:31Z)
Exploring the Causality of End-to-End Autonomous Driving [57.631400236930375]
We propose a comprehensive approach to explore and analyze the causality of end-to-end autonomous driving. Our work is the first to unveil the mystery of end-to-end autonomous driving and turn the black box into a white one.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-09T04:56:11Z)
Exploring and steering the moral compass of Large Language Models [55.2480439325792]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have become central to advancing automation and decision-making across various sectors. This study proposes a comprehensive comparative analysis of the most advanced LLMs to assess their moral profiles.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-27T16:49:22Z)
Work-in-Progress: Crash Course: Can (Under Attack) Autonomous Driving Beat Human Drivers? [60.51287814584477]
This paper evaluates the inherent risks in autonomous driving by examining the current landscape of AVs. We develop specific claims highlighting the delicate balance between the advantages of AVs and potential security challenges in real-world scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-14T09:42:21Z)
Eagle: Ethical Dataset Given from Real Interactions [74.7319697510621]
We create datasets extracted from real interactions between ChatGPT and users that exhibit social biases, toxicity, and immoral problems. Our experiments show that Eagle captures complementary aspects, not covered by existing datasets proposed for evaluation and mitigation of such ethical challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-22T03:46:02Z)
Informed AI Regulation: Comparing the Ethical Frameworks of Leading LLM Chatbots Using an Ethics-Based Audit to Assess Moral Reasoning and Normative Values [0.0]
Ethics-based audits play a pivotal role in the rapidly growing fields of AI safety and regulation. This paper undertakes an ethics-based audit to probe the 8 leading commercial and open-source Large Language Models including GPT-4.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-09T14:57:30Z)
The Ethics of Automating Legal Actors [58.81546227716182]
We argue that automating the role of the judge raises difficult ethical challenges, in particular for common law legal systems. Our argument follows from the social role of the judge in actively shaping the law, rather than merely applying it. Even in the case the models could achieve human-level capabilities, there would still be remaining ethical concerns inherent in the automation of the legal process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-01T13:48:46Z)
Moral Dilemmas for Moral Machines [0.0]
I argue that this is a misapplication of philosophical thought experiments because it fails to appreciate the purpose of moral dilemmas. There are uses of moral dilemmas in machine ethics that are appropriate and the novel situations that arise in a machine-learning context can shed some light on philosophical work in ethics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-11T18:24:39Z)
Future Intelligent Autonomous Robots, Ethical by Design. Learning from Autonomous Cars Ethics [19.911701966878947]
The field of ethics of intelligent autonomous robotic cars is a good example of research with actionable practical value. It could be used as a starting platform for the approaches to the development of intelligent autonomous robots. Drawing from our work on ethics of autonomous intelligent robocars, and the existing literature on ethics of robotics, our contribution consists of a set of values and ethical principles.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-16T21:10:04Z)
Machine Ethics and Automated Vehicles [0.0]
A fully-automated vehicle must continuously decide how to allocate this risk without a human driver's oversight. I introduce the concept of moral behavior for an automated vehicle, argue the need for research in this area through responses to anticipated critiques, and discuss relevant applications from machine ethics and moral modeling research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-29T15:14:47Z)
Away from Trolley Problems and Toward Risk Management [0.0]
I discuss the shortcomings of the trolley problem, and introduce more nuanced examples that involve crash risk and uncertainty. Risk management is introduced as an alternative approach, and its ethical dimensions are discussed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-28T20:27:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.