Pioneering Reliable Assessment in Text-to-Image Knowledge Editing: Leveraging a Fine-Grained Dataset and an Innovative Criterion

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.17928v2
• Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 06:03:00 GMT
• Title: Pioneering Reliable Assessment in Text-to-Image Knowledge Editing: Leveraging a Fine-Grained Dataset and an Innovative Criterion
• Authors: Hengrui Gu, Kaixiong Zhou, Yili Wang, Ruobing Wang, Xin Wang,
• Abstract summary: Text-to-Image (T2I) diffusion models encode factual knowledge into their parameters. Knowledge editing techniques aim to update model knowledge in a targeted way. We design a T2I knowledge editing framework by comprehensively spanning on three phases. We introduce textbfMPE, a simple but effective approach for T2I knowledge editing.
• Score: 21.37254997228105
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: During pre-training, the Text-to-Image (T2I) diffusion models encode factual knowledge into their parameters. These parameterized facts enable realistic image generation, but they may become obsolete over time, thereby misrepresenting the current state of the world. Knowledge editing techniques aim to update model knowledge in a targeted way. However, facing the dual challenges posed by inadequate editing datasets and unreliable evaluation criterion, the development of T2I knowledge editing encounter difficulties in effectively generalizing injected knowledge. In this work, we design a T2I knowledge editing framework by comprehensively spanning on three phases: First, we curate a dataset \textbf{CAKE}, comprising paraphrase and multi-object test, to enable more fine-grained assessment on knowledge generalization. Second, we propose a novel criterion, \textbf{adaptive CLIP threshold}, to effectively filter out false successful images under the current criterion and achieve reliable editing evaluation. Finally, we introduce \textbf{MPE}, a simple but effective approach for T2I knowledge editing. Instead of tuning parameters, MPE precisely recognizes and edits the outdated part of the conditioning text-prompt to accommodate the up-to-date knowledge. A straightforward implementation of MPE (Based on in-context learning) exhibits better overall performance than previous model editors. We hope these efforts can further promote faithful evaluation of T2I knowledge editing methods.

Related papers

• K-Edit: Language Model Editing with Contextual Knowledge Awareness [71.73747181407323]
  Knowledge-based model editing enables precise modifications to the weights of large language models. We present K-Edit, an effective approach to generating contextually consistent knowledge edits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-15T01:35:13Z)
• ReEdit: Multimodal Exemplar-Based Image Editing with Diffusion Models [11.830273909934688]
  Modern Text-to-Image (T2I) Diffusion models have revolutionized image editing by enabling the generation of high-quality images. We propose ReEdit, a modular and efficient end-to-end framework that captures edits in both text and image modalities. Our results demonstrate that ReEdit consistently outperforms contemporary approaches both qualitatively and quantitatively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-06T15:19:24Z)
• Has this Fact been Edited? Detecting Knowledge Edits in Language Models [5.260519479124422]
  Knowledge editing methods (KEs) can update language models' obsolete or inaccurate knowledge learned from pre-training. Knowing whether a generated output is based on edited knowledge or first-hand knowledge from pre-training can increase users' trust in generative models. We propose a novel task: detecting edited knowledge in language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-04T22:02:24Z)
• Robust and Scalable Model Editing for Large Language Models [75.95623066605259]
  We propose EREN (Edit models by REading Notes) to improve the scalability and robustness of LLM editing. Unlike existing techniques, it can integrate knowledge from multiple edits, and correctly respond to syntactically similar but semantically unrelated inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-26T06:57:23Z)
• AKEW: Assessing Knowledge Editing in the Wild [79.96813982502952]
  AKEW (Assessing Knowledge Editing in the Wild) is a new practical benchmark for knowledge editing. It fully covers three editing settings of knowledge updates: structured facts, unstructured texts as facts, and extracted triplets. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate the considerable gap between state-of-the-art knowledge-editing methods and practical scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T07:08:34Z)
• EVEDIT: Event-based Knowledge Editing with Deductive Editing Boundaries [69.72012539060731]
  We introduce a theoretical framework for efficient knowledge editing (KE) in large language models (LLMs) We propose a novel task of event-based knowledge editing that pairs facts with event descriptions. We empirically demonstrate the superiority of event-based editing over the existing setting on resolving uncertainty in edited models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-17T16:34:50Z)
• StyleDiffusion: Prompt-Embedding Inversion for Text-Based Editing [115.49488548588305]
  A significant research effort is focused on exploiting the amazing capacities of pretrained diffusion models for the editing of images. They either finetune the model, or invert the image in the latent space of the pretrained model. They suffer from two problems: Unsatisfying results for selected regions and unexpected changes in non-selected regions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-28T00:16:45Z)
• EditEval: An Instruction-Based Benchmark for Text Improvements [73.5918084416016]
  This work presents EditEval: An instruction-based, benchmark and evaluation suite for automatic evaluation of editing capabilities. We evaluate several pre-trained models, which shows that InstructGPT and PEER perform the best, but that most baselines fall below the supervised SOTA. Our analysis shows that commonly used metrics for editing tasks do not always correlate well, and that optimization for prompts with the highest performance does not necessarily entail the strongest robustness to different models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-27T12:26:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.