Trustworthy AI: Securing Sensitive Data in Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.18222v1
• Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 19:02:33 GMT
• Title: Trustworthy AI: Securing Sensitive Data in Large Language Models
• Authors: Georgios Feretzakis, Vassilios S. Verykios,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed natural language processing (NLP) by enabling robust text generation and understanding. This paper proposes a comprehensive framework for embedding trust mechanisms into LLMs to dynamically control the disclosure of sensitive information.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed natural language processing (NLP) by enabling robust text generation and understanding. However, their deployment in sensitive domains like healthcare, finance, and legal services raises critical concerns about privacy and data security. This paper proposes a comprehensive framework for embedding trust mechanisms into LLMs to dynamically control the disclosure of sensitive information. The framework integrates three core components: User Trust Profiling, Information Sensitivity Detection, and Adaptive Output Control. By leveraging techniques such as Role-Based Access Control (RBAC), Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC), Named Entity Recognition (NER), contextual analysis, and privacy-preserving methods like differential privacy, the system ensures that sensitive information is disclosed appropriately based on the user's trust level. By focusing on balancing data utility and privacy, the proposed solution offers a novel approach to securely deploying LLMs in high-risk environments. Future work will focus on testing this framework across various domains to evaluate its effectiveness in managing sensitive data while maintaining system efficiency.

Related papers

• Data Obfuscation through Latent Space Projection (LSP) for Privacy-Preserving AI Governance: Case Studies in Medical Diagnosis and Finance Fraud Detection [0.0]
  This paper introduces Data Obfuscation through Latent Space Projection (LSP), a novel technique aimed at enhancing AI governance and ensuring Responsible AI compliance. LSP uses machine learning to project sensitive data into a latent space, effectively obfuscating it while preserving essential features for model training and inference. We validate LSP's effectiveness through experiments on benchmark datasets and two real-world case studies: healthcare cancer diagnosis and financial fraud analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T22:31:03Z)
• Adaptive Guardrails For Large Language Models via Trust Modeling and In-Context Learning [9.719986610417441]
  Guardrails have become an integral part of Large language models (LLMs) This study introduces an adaptive guardrail mechanism, supported by trust modeling and enhanced with in-context learning. By leveraging a combination of direct interaction trust and authority-verified trust, the system precisely tailors the strictness of content moderation to align with the user's credibility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-16T18:07:48Z)
• Complete Security and Privacy for AI Inference in Decentralized Systems [14.526663289437584]
  Large models are crucial for tasks like diagnosing diseases but tend to be delicate and not very scalable. Nesa solves these challenges with a comprehensive framework using multiple techniques to protect data and model outputs. Nesa's state-of-the-art proofs and principles demonstrate the framework's effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-28T05:09:17Z)
• Robust Utility-Preserving Text Anonymization Based on Large Language Models [80.5266278002083]
  Text anonymization is crucial for sharing sensitive data while maintaining privacy. Existing techniques face the emerging challenges of re-identification attack ability of Large Language Models. This paper proposes a framework composed of three LLM-based components -- a privacy evaluator, a utility evaluator, and an optimization component.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T14:28:56Z)
• Mind the Privacy Unit! User-Level Differential Privacy for Language Model Fine-Tuning [62.224804688233]
  differential privacy (DP) offers a promising solution by ensuring models are 'almost indistinguishable' with or without any particular privacy unit. We study user-level DP motivated by applications where it necessary to ensure uniform privacy protection across users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T13:54:32Z)
• Data Collaboration Analysis Over Matrix Manifolds [0.0]
  Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning (PPML) addresses this challenge by safeguarding sensitive information. NRI-DC framework emerges as an innovative approach, potentially resolving the 'data island' issue among institutions. This study establishes a rigorous theoretical foundation for these collaboration functions and introduces new formulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T08:52:16Z)
• State-of-the-Art Approaches to Enhancing Privacy Preservation of Machine Learning Datasets: A Survey [0.0]
  This paper examines the evolving landscape of machine learning (ML) and its profound impact across various sectors. It focuses on the emerging field of Privacy-preserving Machine Learning (PPML) As ML applications become increasingly integral to industries like telecommunications, financial technology, and surveillance, they raise significant privacy concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-25T17:31:06Z)
• Decentralized Stochastic Optimization with Inherent Privacy Protection [103.62463469366557]
  Decentralized optimization is the basic building block of modern collaborative machine learning, distributed estimation and control, and large-scale sensing. Since involved data, privacy protection has become an increasingly pressing need in the implementation of decentralized optimization algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-08T14:38:23Z)
• Distributed Machine Learning and the Semblance of Trust [66.1227776348216]
  Federated Learning (FL) allows the data owner to maintain data governance and perform model training locally without having to share their data. FL and related techniques are often described as privacy-preserving. We explain why this term is not appropriate and outline the risks associated with over-reliance on protocols that were not designed with formal definitions of privacy in mind.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-21T08:44:05Z)
• Trustworthy AI [75.99046162669997]
  Brittleness to minor adversarial changes in the input data, ability to explain the decisions, address the bias in their training data, are some of the most prominent limitations. We propose the tutorial on Trustworthy AI to address six critical issues in enhancing user and public trust in AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-02T20:04:18Z)
• CryptoSPN: Privacy-preserving Sum-Product Network Inference [84.88362774693914]
  We present a framework for privacy-preserving inference of sum-product networks (SPNs) CryptoSPN achieves highly efficient and accurate inference in the order of seconds for medium-sized SPNs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-03T14:49:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.