Q-Bench-Video: Benchmarking the Video Quality Understanding of LMMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.20063v1
• Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 08:05:00 GMT
• Title: Q-Bench-Video: Benchmarking the Video Quality Understanding of LMMs
• Authors: Zicheng Zhang, Ziheng Jia, Haoning Wu, Chunyi Li, Zijian Chen, Yingjie Zhou, Wei Sun, Xiaohong Liu, Xiongkuo Min, Weisi Lin, Guangtao Zhai,
• Abstract summary: We introduce Q-Bench-Video, a new benchmark specifically designed to evaluate LMMs' proficiency in discerning video quality. We collect a total of 2,378 question-answer pairs and test them on 12 open-source & 5 proprietary LMMs. Our findings indicate that while LMMs have a foundational understanding of video quality, their performance remains incomplete and imprecise, with a notable discrepancy compared to human performance.
• Score: 76.15356325947731
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: With the rising interest in research on Large Multi-modal Models (LMMs) for video understanding, many studies have emphasized general video comprehension capabilities, neglecting the systematic exploration into video quality understanding. To address this oversight, we introduce Q-Bench-Video in this paper, a new benchmark specifically designed to evaluate LMMs' proficiency in discerning video quality. a) To ensure video source diversity, Q-Bench-Video encompasses videos from natural scenes, AI-generated Content (AIGC), and Computer Graphics (CG). b) Building on the traditional multiple-choice questions format with the Yes-or-No and What-How categories, we include Open-ended questions to better evaluate complex scenarios. Additionally, we incorporate the video pair quality comparison question to enhance comprehensiveness. c) Beyond the traditional Technical, Aesthetic, and Temporal distortions, we have expanded our evaluation aspects to include the dimension of AIGC distortions, which addresses the increasing demand for video generation. Finally, we collect a total of 2,378 question-answer pairs and test them on 12 open-source & 5 proprietary LMMs. Our findings indicate that while LMMs have a foundational understanding of video quality, their performance remains incomplete and imprecise, with a notable discrepancy compared to human performance. Through Q-Bench-Video, we seek to catalyze community interest, stimulate further research, and unlock the untapped potential of LMMs to close the gap in video quality understanding.

Related papers

• VQA$^2$: Visual Question Answering for Video Quality Assessment [76.81110038738699]
  Video Quality Assessment (VQA) is a classic field in low-level visual perception. Recent studies in the image domain have demonstrated that Visual Question Answering (VQA) can enhance markedly low-level visual quality evaluation. We introduce the VQA2 Instruction dataset - the first visual question answering instruction dataset that focuses on video quality assessment. The VQA2 series models interleave visual and motion tokens to enhance the perception of spatial-temporal quality details in videos.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-06T09:39:52Z)
• LMM-VQA: Advancing Video Quality Assessment with Large Multimodal Models [53.64461404882853]
  Video quality assessment (VQA) algorithms are needed to monitor and optimize the quality of streaming videos. Here, we propose the first Large Multi-Modal Video Quality Assessment (LMM-VQA) model, which introduces a novel visual modeling strategy for quality-aware feature extraction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-26T04:29:52Z)
• MMBench-Video: A Long-Form Multi-Shot Benchmark for Holistic Video Understanding [67.56182262082729]
  We introduce MMBench-Video, a quantitative benchmark to rigorously evaluate large vision-language models (LVLMs) in video understanding. MMBench-Video incorporates lengthy videos from YouTube and employs free-form questions, mirroring practical use cases. The benchmark is meticulously crafted to probe the models' temporal reasoning skills, with all questions human-annotated according to a carefully constructed ability taxonomy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T17:26:01Z)
• VideoVista: A Versatile Benchmark for Video Understanding and Reasoning [46.838692817107116]
  We present VideoVista, a video QA benchmark that integrates challenges across diverse content categories, durations, and abilities. VideoVista comprises 25,000 questions derived from 3,400 videos spanning 14 categories (e.g., Howto, Film, and Entertainment) with durations ranging from a few seconds to over 10 minutes. It encompasses 19 types of understanding tasks (e.g., anomaly detection, interaction understanding) and 8 reasoning tasks (e.g., logical reasoning, causal reasoning)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T08:09:00Z)
• Needle In A Video Haystack: A Scalable Synthetic Evaluator for Video MLLMs [20.168429351519055]
  Video understanding is a crucial next step for multimodal large language models (LMLMs) We propose VideoNIAH (Video Needle In A Haystack), a benchmark construction framework through synthetic video generation. We conduct a comprehensive evaluation of both proprietary and open-source models, uncovering significant differences in their video understanding capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T17:50:05Z)
• How Good is my Video LMM? Complex Video Reasoning and Robustness Evaluation Suite for Video-LMMs [98.37571997794072]
  We present the Complex Video Reasoning and Robustness Evaluation Suite (CVRR-ES) CVRR-ES comprehensively assesses the performance of Video-LMMs across 11 diverse real-world video dimensions. Our findings provide valuable insights for building the next generation of human-centric AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-06T17:59:45Z)
• MoVQA: A Benchmark of Versatile Question-Answering for Long-Form Movie Understanding [69.04413943858584]
  We introduce MoVQA, a long-form movie question-answering dataset. We also benchmark to assess the diverse cognitive capabilities of multimodal systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-08T03:33:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.