Strategic Classification With Externalities

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.08032v1
• Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 15:28:04 GMT
• Title: Strategic Classification With Externalities
• Authors: Yiling Chen, Safwan Hossain, Evi Micha, Ariel Procaccia,
• Abstract summary: We propose a new variant of the strategic classification problem. Motivated by real-world applications, our model crucially allows the manipulation of one agent to affect another. We show that under certain assumptions, the pure Nash Equilibrium of this agent manipulation game is unique and can be efficiently computed.
• Score: 11.36782598786846
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We propose a new variant of the strategic classification problem: a principal reveals a classifier, and $n$ agents report their (possibly manipulated) features to be classified. Motivated by real-world applications, our model crucially allows the manipulation of one agent to affect another; that is, it explicitly captures inter-agent externalities. The principal-agent interactions are formally modeled as a Stackelberg game, with the resulting agent manipulation dynamics captured as a simultaneous game. We show that under certain assumptions, the pure Nash Equilibrium of this agent manipulation game is unique and can be efficiently computed. Leveraging this result, PAC learning guarantees are established for the learner: informally, we show that it is possible to learn classifiers that minimize loss on the distribution, even when a random number of agents are manipulating their way to a pure Nash Equilibrium. We also comment on the optimization of such classifiers through gradient-based approaches. This work sets the theoretical foundations for a more realistic analysis of classifiers that are robust against multiple strategic actors interacting in a common environment.

Related papers

• Bayesian Strategic Classification [11.439576371711711]
  We study the study of partial information release by the learner in strategic classification. We show how such partial information release can, counter-intuitively, benefit the learner's accuracy, despite increasing agents' abilities to manipulate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T19:51:49Z)
• Learning and Calibrating Heterogeneous Bounded Rational Market Behaviour with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [4.40301653518681]
  Agent-based models (ABMs) have shown promise for modelling various real world phenomena incompatible with traditional equilibrium analysis. Recent developments in multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) offer a way to address this issue from a rationality perspective. We propose a novel technique for representing heterogeneous processing-constrained agents within a MARL framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T17:21:45Z)
• MERMAIDE: Learning to Align Learners using Model-Based Meta-Learning [62.065503126104126]
  We study how a principal can efficiently and effectively intervene on the rewards of a previously unseen learning agent in order to induce desirable outcomes. This is relevant to many real-world settings like auctions or taxation, where the principal may not know the learning behavior nor the rewards of real people. We introduce MERMAIDE, a model-based meta-learning framework to train a principal that can quickly adapt to out-of-distribution agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-10T15:44:50Z)
• Homomorphism Autoencoder -- Learning Group Structured Representations from Observed Transitions [51.71245032890532]
  We propose methods enabling an agent acting upon the world to learn internal representations of sensory information consistent with actions that modify it. In contrast to existing work, our approach does not require prior knowledge of the group and does not restrict the set of actions the agent can perform.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-25T11:22:48Z)
• Decentralized scheduling through an adaptive, trading-based multi-agent system [1.7403133838762448]
  In multi-agent reinforcement learning systems, the actions of one agent can have a negative impact on the rewards of other agents. This work applies a trading approach to a simulated scheduling environment, where the agents are responsible for the assignment of incoming jobs to compute cores. The agents can trade the usage right of computational cores to process high-priority, high-reward jobs faster than low-priority, low-reward jobs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-05T13:50:18Z)
• Efficient Model-based Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning via Optimistic Equilibrium Computation [93.52573037053449]
  H-MARL (Hallucinated Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning) learns successful equilibrium policies after a few interactions with the environment. We demonstrate our approach experimentally on an autonomous driving simulation benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-14T17:24:03Z)
• Contrastive Learning for Fair Representations [50.95604482330149]
  Trained classification models can unintentionally lead to biased representations and predictions. Existing debiasing methods for classification models, such as adversarial training, are often expensive to train and difficult to optimise. We propose a method for mitigating bias by incorporating contrastive learning, in which instances sharing the same class label are encouraged to have similar representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-22T10:47:51Z)
• Deep Interactive Bayesian Reinforcement Learning via Meta-Learning [63.96201773395921]
  The optimal adaptive behaviour under uncertainty over the other agents' strategies can be computed using the Interactive Bayesian Reinforcement Learning framework. We propose to meta-learn approximate belief inference and Bayes-optimal behaviour for a given prior. We show empirically that our approach outperforms existing methods that use a model-free approach, sample from the approximate posterior, maintain memory-free models of others, or do not fully utilise the known structure of the environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-11T13:25:13Z)
• Randomized Entity-wise Factorization for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [59.62721526353915]
  Multi-agent settings in the real world often involve tasks with varying types and quantities of agents and non-agent entities. Our method aims to leverage these commonalities by asking the question: What is the expected utility of each agent when only considering a randomly selected sub-group of its observed entities?''
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-07T18:28:41Z)
• Learning to Model Opponent Learning [11.61673411387596]
  Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) considers settings in which a set of coexisting agents interact with one another and their environment. This poses a great challenge for value function-based algorithms whose convergence usually relies on the assumption of a stationary environment. We develop a novel approach to modelling an opponent's learning dynamics which we term Learning to Model Opponent Learning (LeMOL)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-06T17:19:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.