SciGisPy: a Novel Metric for Biomedical Text Simplification via Gist Inference Score

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.09632v1
• Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:53:56 GMT
• Title: SciGisPy: a Novel Metric for Biomedical Text Simplification via Gist Inference Score
• Authors: Chen Lyu, Gabriele Pergola,
• Abstract summary: We introduce SciGisPy, a novel evaluation metric inspired by Gist Inference Score (GIS) from Fuzzy-Trace Theory (FTT) SciGisPy measures how well a simplified text facilitates the formation of abstract inferences (gist) necessary for comprehension. Our experimental evaluation on the Cochrane biomedical text simplification dataset demonstrates that SciGisPy outperforms the original GIS formulation.
• Score: 7.4751114996742
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Biomedical literature is often written in highly specialized language, posing significant comprehension challenges for non-experts. Automatic text simplification (ATS) offers a solution by making such texts more accessible while preserving critical information. However, evaluating ATS for biomedical texts is still challenging due to the limitations of existing evaluation metrics. General-domain metrics like SARI, BLEU, and ROUGE focus on surface-level text features, and readability metrics like FKGL and ARI fail to account for domain-specific terminology or assess how well the simplified text conveys core meanings (gist). To address this, we introduce SciGisPy, a novel evaluation metric inspired by Gist Inference Score (GIS) from Fuzzy-Trace Theory (FTT). SciGisPy measures how well a simplified text facilitates the formation of abstract inferences (gist) necessary for comprehension, especially in the biomedical domain. We revise GIS for this purpose by introducing domain-specific enhancements, including semantic chunking, Information Content (IC) theory, and specialized embeddings, while removing unsuitable indexes. Our experimental evaluation on the Cochrane biomedical text simplification dataset demonstrates that SciGisPy outperforms the original GIS formulation, with a significant increase in correctly identified simplified texts (84% versus 44.8%). The results and a thorough ablation study confirm that SciGisPy better captures the essential meaning of biomedical content, outperforming existing approaches.

Related papers

• Attribute Structuring Improves LLM-Based Evaluation of Clinical Text Summaries [62.32403630651586]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown the potential to generate accurate clinical text summaries, but still struggle with issues regarding grounding and evaluation. Here, we explore a general mitigation framework using Attribute Structuring (AS), which structures the summary evaluation process. AS consistently improves the correspondence between human annotations and automated metrics in clinical text summarization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-01T21:59:03Z)
• Self-Verification Improves Few-Shot Clinical Information Extraction [73.6905567014859]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown the potential to accelerate clinical curation via few-shot in-context learning. They still struggle with issues regarding accuracy and interpretability, especially in mission-critical domains such as health. Here, we explore a general mitigation framework using self-verification, which leverages the LLM to provide provenance for its own extraction and check its own outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-30T22:05:11Z)
• DNA-GPT: Divergent N-Gram Analysis for Training-Free Detection of GPT-Generated Text [82.5469544192645]
  We propose a novel training-free detection strategy called Divergent N-Gram Analysis (DNA-GPT) By analyzing the differences between the original and new remaining parts through N-gram analysis, we unveil significant discrepancies between the distribution of machine-generated text and human-written text. Results show that our zero-shot approach exhibits state-of-the-art performance in distinguishing between human and GPT-generated text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-27T03:58:29Z)
• Readability Controllable Biomedical Document Summarization [17.166794984161964]
  We introduce a new task of readability controllable summarization for biomedical documents. It aims to recognise users' readability demands and generate summaries that better suit their needs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-10T14:03:20Z)
• Hierarchical Heterogeneous Graph Representation Learning for Short Text Classification [60.233529926965836]
  We propose a new method called SHINE, which is based on graph neural network (GNN) for short text classification. First, we model the short text dataset as a hierarchical heterogeneous graph consisting of word-level component graphs. Then, we dynamically learn a short document graph that facilitates effective label propagation among similar short texts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-30T05:33:05Z)
• Fine-tuning Pretrained Language Models with Label Attention for Explainable Biomedical Text Classification [1.066048003460524]
  We develop an improved label attention-based architecture to inject semantic label description into the fine-tuning process of PTMs. Results on two public medical datasets show that the proposed fine-tuning scheme outperforms the conventionally fine-tuned PTMs and prior state-of-the-art models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-26T14:23:06Z)
• Paragraph-level Simplification of Medical Texts [35.650619024498425]
  Manual simplification does not scale to the rapidly growing body of biomedical literature. We introduce a new corpus of parallel texts in English comprising technical and lay summaries of all published evidence pertaining to different clinical topics. We propose a new metric based on likelihood scores from a masked language model pretrained on scientific texts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-12T18:56:05Z)
• An Interpretable End-to-end Fine-tuning Approach for Long Clinical Text [72.62848911347466]
  Unstructured clinical text in EHRs contains crucial information for applications including decision support, trial matching, and retrospective research. Recent work has applied BERT-based models to clinical information extraction and text classification, given these models' state-of-the-art performance in other NLP domains. In this work, we propose a novel fine-tuning approach called SnipBERT. Instead of using entire notes, SnipBERT identifies crucial snippets and feeds them into a truncated BERT-based model in a hierarchical manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-12T17:14:32Z)
• Be More with Less: Hypergraph Attention Networks for Inductive Text Classification [56.98218530073927]
  Graph neural networks (GNNs) have received increasing attention in the research community and demonstrated their promising results on this canonical task. Despite the success, their performance could be largely jeopardized in practice since they are unable to capture high-order interaction between words. We propose a principled model -- hypergraph attention networks (HyperGAT) which can obtain more expressive power with less computational consumption for text representation learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-01T00:21:59Z)
• Data Mining in Clinical Trial Text: Transformers for Classification and Question Answering Tasks [2.127049691404299]
  This research applies advances in natural language processing to evidence synthesis based on medical texts. The main focus is on information characterized via the Population, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcome (PICO) framework. Recent neural network architectures based on transformers show capacities for transfer learning and increased performance on downstream natural language processing tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-30T11:45:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.