A Multi-Task Text Classification Pipeline with Natural Language Explanations: A User-Centric Evaluation in Sentiment Analysis and Offensive Language Identification in Greek Tweets

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.10290v1
• Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 08:41:31 GMT
• Title: A Multi-Task Text Classification Pipeline with Natural Language Explanations: A User-Centric Evaluation in Sentiment Analysis and Offensive Language Identification in Greek Tweets
• Authors: Nikolaos Mylonas, Nikolaos Stylianou, Theodora Tsikrika, Stefanos Vrochidis, Ioannis Kompatsiaris,
• Abstract summary: This work introduces an early concept for a novel pipeline that can be used in text classification tasks. It comprises of two models: a classifier for labelling the text and an explanation generator which provides the explanation. Experiments are centred around the tasks of sentiment analysis and offensive language identification in Greek tweets.
• Score: 8.846643533783205
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Interpretability is a topic that has been in the spotlight for the past few years. Most existing interpretability techniques produce interpretations in the form of rules or feature importance. These interpretations, while informative, may be harder to understand for non-expert users and therefore, cannot always be considered as adequate explanations. To that end, explanations in natural language are often preferred, as they are easier to comprehend and also more presentable to end-users. This work introduces an early concept for a novel pipeline that can be used in text classification tasks, offering predictions and explanations in natural language. It comprises of two models: a classifier for labelling the text and an explanation generator which provides the explanation. The proposed pipeline can be adopted by any text classification task, given that ground truth rationales are available to train the explanation generator. Our experiments are centred around the tasks of sentiment analysis and offensive language identification in Greek tweets, using a Greek Large Language Model (LLM) to obtain the necessary explanations that can act as rationales. The experimental evaluation was performed through a user study based on three different metrics and achieved promising results for both datasets.

Related papers

• Parallel Sentence-Level Explanation Generation for Real-World Low-Resource Scenarios [18.5713713816771]
  This paper is the first to explore the problem smoothly from weak-supervised learning to unsupervised learning. We propose a non-autoregressive interpretable model to facilitate parallel explanation generation and simultaneous prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-21T14:52:21Z)
• Explanation Selection Using Unlabeled Data for Chain-of-Thought Prompting [80.9896041501715]
  Explanations that have not been "tuned" for a task, such as off-the-shelf explanations written by nonexperts, may lead to mediocre performance. This paper tackles the problem of how to optimize explanation-infused prompts in a blackbox fashion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-09T18:02:34Z)
• Saliency Map Verbalization: Comparing Feature Importance Representations from Model-free and Instruction-based Methods [6.018950511093273]
  Saliency maps can explain a neural model's predictions by identifying important input features. We formalize the underexplored task of translating saliency maps into natural language. We compare two novel methods (search-based and instruction-based verbalizations) against conventional feature importance representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-13T17:48:15Z)
• The Unreliability of Explanations in Few-Shot In-Context Learning [50.77996380021221]
  We focus on two NLP tasks that involve reasoning over text, namely question answering and natural language inference. We show that explanations judged as good by humans--those that are logically consistent with the input--usually indicate more accurate predictions. We present a framework for calibrating model predictions based on the reliability of the explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-06T17:57:58Z)
• Human Interpretation of Saliency-based Explanation Over Text [65.29015910991261]
  We study saliency-based explanations over textual data. We find that people often mis-interpret the explanations. We propose a method to adjust saliencies based on model estimates of over- and under-perception.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-27T15:20:32Z)
• Curious Case of Language Generation Evaluation Metrics: A Cautionary Tale [52.663117551150954]
  A few popular metrics remain as the de facto metrics to evaluate tasks such as image captioning and machine translation. This is partly due to ease of use, and partly because researchers expect to see them and know how to interpret them. In this paper, we urge the community for more careful consideration of how they automatically evaluate their models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-26T13:57:20Z)
• Towards Interpretable Natural Language Understanding with Explanations as Latent Variables [146.83882632854485]
  We develop a framework for interpretable natural language understanding that requires only a small set of human annotated explanations for training. Our framework treats natural language explanations as latent variables that model the underlying reasoning process of a neural model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-24T02:05:56Z)
• Information-Theoretic Probing for Linguistic Structure [74.04862204427944]
  We propose an information-theoretic operationalization of probing as estimating mutual information. We evaluate on a set of ten typologically diverse languages often underrepresented in NLP research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-07T01:06:36Z)
• Generating Hierarchical Explanations on Text Classification via Feature Interaction Detection [21.02924712220406]
  We build hierarchical explanations by detecting feature interactions. Such explanations visualize how words and phrases are combined at different levels of the hierarchy. Experiments show the effectiveness of the proposed method in providing explanations both faithful to models and interpretable to humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-04T20:56:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.