Enhancing AI Assisted Writing with One-Shot Implicit Negative Feedback

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.11009v1
• Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 18:50:28 GMT
• Title: Enhancing AI Assisted Writing with One-Shot Implicit Negative Feedback
• Authors: Benjamin Towle, Ke Zhou,
• Abstract summary: Nifty is an approach that uses classifier guidance to controllably integrate implicit user feedback into the text generation process. We find up to 34% improvement in Rouge-L, 89% improvement in generating the correct intent, and an 86% win-rate according to human evaluators.
• Score: 6.175028561101999
• License:
• Abstract: AI-mediated communication enables users to communicate more quickly and efficiently. Various systems have been proposed such as smart reply and AI-assisted writing. Yet, the heterogeneity of the forms of inputs and architectures often renders it challenging to combine insights from user behaviour in one system to improve performance in another. In this work, we consider the case where the user does not select any of the suggested replies from a smart reply system, and how this can be used as one-shot implicit negative feedback to enhance the accuracy of an AI writing model. We introduce Nifty, an approach that uses classifier guidance to controllably integrate implicit user feedback into the text generation process. Empirically, we find up to 34% improvement in Rouge-L, 89% improvement in generating the correct intent, and an 86% win-rate according to human evaluators compared to a vanilla AI writing system on the MultiWOZ and Schema-Guided Dialog datasets.

Related papers

• Improved Contextual Recognition In Automatic Speech Recognition Systems By Semantic Lattice Rescoring [4.819085609772069]
  We propose a novel approach for enhancing contextual recognition within ASR systems via semantic lattice processing. Our solution consists of using Hidden Markov Models and Gaussian Mixture Models (HMM-GMM) along with Deep Neural Networks (DNN) models for better accuracy. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed framework on the LibriSpeech dataset with empirical analyses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-14T23:16:05Z)
• UltraFeedback: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI Feedback [99.4633351133207]
  We present textscUltraFeedback, a large-scale, high-quality, and diversified AI feedback dataset. Our work validates the effectiveness of scaled AI feedback data in constructing strong open-source chat language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T17:40:01Z)
• PICK: Polished & Informed Candidate Scoring for Knowledge-Grounded Dialogue Systems [59.1250765143521]
  Current knowledge-grounded dialogue systems often fail to align the generated responses with human-preferred qualities. We propose Polished & Informed Candidate Scoring (PICK), a generation re-scoring framework. We demonstrate the effectiveness of PICK in generating responses that are more faithful while keeping them relevant to the dialogue history.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-19T08:27:09Z)
• System-Level Natural Language Feedback [83.24259100437965]
  We show how to use feedback to formalize system-level design decisions in a human-in-the-loop-process. We conduct two case studies of this approach for improving search query and dialog response generation. We show the combination of system-level and instance-level feedback brings further gains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-23T16:21:40Z)
• Self-Aware Feedback-Based Self-Learning in Large-Scale Conversational AI [8.638846754482467]
  Self-learning paradigms in large-scale conversational AI agents tend to leverage user feedback in bridging between what they say and what they mean. We show that our self-aware model improves the overall PR-AUC by 27.45%, achieves a relative defect reduction of up to 31.22%, and is able to adapt quicker to changes in global preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-29T18:18:40Z)
• What is wrong with you?: Leveraging User Sentiment for Automatic Dialog Evaluation [73.03318027164605]
  We propose to use information that can be automatically extracted from the next user utterance as a proxy to measure the quality of the previous system response. Our model generalizes across both spoken and written open-domain dialog corpora collected from real and paid users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-25T22:09:52Z)
• User Response and Sentiment Prediction for Automatic Dialogue Evaluation [69.11124655437902]
  We propose to use the sentiment of the next user utterance for turn or dialog level evaluation. Experiments show our model outperforming existing automatic evaluation metrics on both written and spoken open-domain dialogue datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-16T22:19:17Z)
• Actionable Conversational Quality Indicators for Improving Task-Oriented Dialog Systems [2.6094079735487994]
  This paper introduces and explains the use of Actionable Conversational Quality Indicators (ACQIs) ACQIs are used both to recognize parts of dialogs that can be improved, and to recommend how to improve them. We demonstrate the effectiveness of using ACQIs on LivePerson internal dialog systems used in commercial customer service applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-22T22:41:42Z)
• Personalized Query Rewriting in Conversational AI Agents [7.086654234990377]
  We propose a query rewriting approach by leveraging users' historically successful interactions as a form of memory. We present a neural retrieval model and a pointer-generator network with hierarchical attention and show that they perform significantly better at the query rewriting task with the aforementioned user memories than without.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-09T20:45:39Z)
• Partial Bandit and Semi-Bandit: Making the Most Out of Scarce Users' Feedback [62.997667081978825]
  We present a novel approach for considering user feedback and evaluate it using three distinct strategies. Despite a limited number of feedbacks returned by users (as low as 20% of the total), our approach obtains similar results to those of state of the art approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-16T07:32:51Z)
• Large-scale Hybrid Approach for Predicting User Satisfaction with Conversational Agents [28.668681892786264]
  Measuring user satisfaction level is a challenging task, and a critical component in developing large-scale conversational agent systems. Human annotation based approaches are easier to control, but hard to scale. A novel alternative approach is to collect user's direct feedback via a feedback elicitation system embedded to the conversational agent system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-29T16:29:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.