Related papers: Why AI Is WEIRD and Should Not Be This Way: Towards AI For Everyone, With Everyone, By Everyone

Why AI Is WEIRD and Should Not Be This Way: Towards AI For Everyone, With Everyone, By Everyone

URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.16315v1
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2024 10:44:26 GMT
Title: Why AI Is WEIRD and Should Not Be This Way: Towards AI For Everyone, With Everyone, By Everyone
Authors: Rada Mihalcea, Oana Ignat, Longju Bai, Angana Borah, Luis Chiruzzo, Zhijing Jin, Claude Kwizera, Joan Nwatu, Soujanya Poria, Thamar Solorio,
Abstract summary: This paper presents a vision for creating AI systems that are inclusive at every stage of development. We address key limitations in the current AI pipeline and its WEIRD representation.
Score: 47.19142377073831
License:
Abstract: This paper presents a vision for creating AI systems that are inclusive at every stage of development, from data collection to model design and evaluation. We address key limitations in the current AI pipeline and its WEIRD representation, such as lack of data diversity, biases in model performance, and narrow evaluation metrics. We also focus on the need for diverse representation among the developers of these systems, as well as incentives that are not skewed toward certain groups. We highlight opportunities to develop AI systems that are for everyone (with diverse stakeholders in mind), with everyone (inclusive of diverse data and annotators), and by everyone (designed and developed by a globally diverse workforce).

Related papers

Bridging Gaps, Building Futures: Advancing Software Developer Diversity and Inclusion Through Future-Oriented Research [50.545824691484796]
We present insights from SE researchers and practitioners on challenges and solutions regarding diversity and inclusion in SE. We share potential utopian and dystopian visions of the future and provide future research directions and implications for academia and industry.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-10T16:18:11Z)
A Vision for Operationalising Diversity and Inclusion in AI [5.4897262701261225]
This study seeks to envision the operationalization of the ethical imperatives of diversity and inclusion (D&I) within AI ecosystems. A significant challenge in AI development is the effective operationalization of D&I principles. This paper proposes a vision of a framework for developing a tool utilizing persona-based simulation by Generative AI (GenAI)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-11T02:44:39Z)
AI for All: Operationalising Diversity and Inclusion Requirements for AI Systems [4.884533605897174]
This research aims to address the lack of research and practice on how to elicit and capture D&I requirements for AI systems. We have proposed a tailored user story template to capture D&I requirements and conducted focus group exercises to use the themes and user story template in writing D&I requirements for two example AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-07T23:15:03Z)
Data-centric Artificial Intelligence: A Survey [47.24049907785989]
Recently, the role of data in AI has been significantly magnified, giving rise to the emerging concept of data-centric AI. In this survey, we discuss the necessity of data-centric AI, followed by a holistic view of three general data-centric goals. We believe this is the first comprehensive survey that provides a global view of a spectrum of tasks across various stages of the data lifecycle.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-17T17:44:56Z)
Human-Centric Multimodal Machine Learning: Recent Advances and Testbed on AI-based Recruitment [66.91538273487379]
There is a certain consensus about the need to develop AI applications with a Human-Centric approach. Human-Centric Machine Learning needs to be developed based on four main requirements: (i) utility and social good; (ii) privacy and data ownership; (iii) transparency and accountability; and (iv) fairness in AI-driven decision-making processes. We study how current multimodal algorithms based on heterogeneous sources of information are affected by sensitive elements and inner biases in the data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-13T16:44:44Z)
Data-centric AI: Perspectives and Challenges [51.70828802140165]
Data-centric AI (DCAI) advocates a fundamental shift from model advancements to ensuring data quality and reliability. We bring together three general missions: training data development, inference data development, and data maintenance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-12T05:28:59Z)
A Seven-Layer Model for Standardising AI Fairness Assessment [0.5076419064097732]
We elaborate that the AI system is prone to biases at every stage of its lifecycle, from inception to its usage. We propose a novel seven-layer model, inspired by the Open System Interconnection (OSI) model, to standardise AI fairness handling.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-21T17:28:07Z)
Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices [44.67324097900778]
Many current AI systems were found vulnerable to imperceptible attacks, biased against underrepresented groups, lacking in user privacy protection, etc. In this review, we strive to provide AI practitioners a comprehensive guide towards building trustworthy AI systems. To unify the current fragmented approaches towards trustworthy AI, we propose a systematic approach that considers the entire lifecycle of AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-04T03:20:39Z)
Distributed and Democratized Learning: Philosophy and Research Challenges [80.39805582015133]
We propose a novel design philosophy called democratized learning (Dem-AI) Inspired by the societal groups of humans, the specialized groups of learning agents in the proposed Dem-AI system are self-organized in a hierarchical structure to collectively perform learning tasks more efficiently. We present a reference design as a guideline to realize future Dem-AI systems, inspired by various interdisciplinary fields.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-18T08:45:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.